Adam Smith Research Paper

Improved Essays
I hope this letter finds you well, and you are doing okay. I got your message about wanting to know about the relationship between the market, and the state. I am happy to tell you that I have researched it, and I can now discuss this topic for you. While doing my research for this topic, I came across articles by Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes. In short I have learned that the state should have some form of intervention in the markets. I will first begin with the philosophy of Adam Smith. Adam Smith has a different view from me on the market, and the state. Smith believes that we should look at both the pre-capitalist societies, and the capitalist societies, and look at them as a way to progress a nation towards capitalism. Also, Smith explains that in a free market economy consumption and production would be based on pursuing self-interest. Smith believed that if everyone was simply just looking out for themselves and their self-interest it would lead to constant improvements of production, and services. Also, Smith discusses about division of labor. Division of labor would result in different specializations, but only as the market demands it. Finally, in a free market the factors of production (labor, capital, and land.) would increase production. Adam believed that the market to act as an “invisible hand.” This means that the free market would fuel the selfish motives of individuals, and brew a more successful economy in the process, and also promote good welfare of the society. In a market such as the one that Adam Smith believes in, the state would have limited or no roles in the market. The state would only be tasked with the public works (not related to the market), the national defense of the nation, and finally justice. These are the views of Adam Smith on whether or not the state should be …show more content…
Unlike Adam Smith, Marx doesn’t come right out to discuss if he believes that the market should remain free, or government controlled. Marx believes that each type of production from different era is unique in its own way. He doesn’t believe in the progression of capitalism, because as I stated before each type of production is unique, and this includes capitalism. Marx’s believes that the act of consumption, and production are both social acts. This is true, because the cooperation of everybody in a society is required to make the economy successful. All societies have to become one in order to make the environment livable for all. Also, very different from Adam’s view is Marx’s view that nature does not transform its self or make itself better. Only human labor can transform nature, and natural resources into useable goods and services. Marx also believes that in every capitalist society there are four different classes. These classes are: the capitalists, small shopkeepers and professional people, poverty stricken class, and the working class. These four classes need each other to make the economy work as one, which is what Marx was trying to explain earlier one. Marx believed that the state should have some say in what goes on in the market. The state should be able to enforce property rights to the rightful owners of the property rights, and also act as an authority figure, or a judge between the rivalries against capitalists. These are the characteristics of a socialism

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Smith and Marx created the industrial revolution and they have some similar ideas and have different ideas of our economy. Smith and Marx only in common was the creation of the industrial revolution. These two economies guys do not have much common, in fact that they have the opposite ideas from another. Smith ideas is the Laisser-faire where the economy is not to have the government be involved with it and he think the economy will fix itself that is the visible hand.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx’s view of private property is significantly differently than what we view as private property today. He believed that private property was ownership of productive property. This is property that is producing a profit for the owner. Marx felt that government should control property and that all should share in the work and reward of the property. Whereas men like John Locke and Thomas Jefferson believed that ownership of property was for important for a good government.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx believed that a violent overthrow of capitalism would lead to international socialism based on common ownership of land and capital. This would transform into an ideal state of communism, which is a worker-governed society based on the guiding concept “from each according to ability, and to each according to need” (Bolotta, Hawkes, Mahoney, Piper, 2002, pg. 58). This theory influenced many revolutions that would take place in the world. For example, the Russian Revolution in 1917, led by Lenin who said he has the philosophical heir to Marx (Schaff, 2009). Both Marx and Lenin are considered to be the two most important figures in the development of communism in the Soviet Union.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles Darwin’s way of thinking expanded far beyond his area of expertise, it expended all the way to psychology, physics, literature and even politics and economics. If you asked him “How much of his work would impact other fields?” personally I do not think he would have known. Darwinian thinking is now deeply engraved in areas such as economics and even business administration. Through this paper I will attempt to see how Darwin interacted with economists of his time such as Karl Marx, how much Adam Smith influenced Darwin, and how the Victorian economy affected how people acted.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He divided the population into two groups: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie was the ruling class; they own the means of production and, because of this, control the people. The proletariat operates the means of production, and is controlled by the bourgeoisie. Marx claimed that everyone fit into one of these groups. Marx’s two social classes are very apparent in Fahrenheit 451’s society.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith was an economist from the mid-late 1700’s and he was able to explain the knowledge of Capitalism; elaborating on how to make money from the free markets that was influential to survival at that time. He wrote a book, An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, which describes the origins of Capitalism in great details with petty examples of this logic set in motion. On the other side of the spectrum, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels both produce a collaborative piece called The Communist Manifesto which heavily criticizes the bourgeoisie, and pushes for a lifestyle in which all property is government owned; eliminating the class system and having all people of the nation work for the same salary. There is a stark…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, Mill does not believe it is in the nature of people of backward society or in the nature of children to be free because these are the types of people who needs to be educated first before they have the opportunity and chance to be free or else it will be futile for them to improve and progress at this stage as humans. Marx on the other hand, believes that the Socialist revolution can only happen in industrialized country. It is not that the nature of the people in the country are of a better natures than others, but because the country themselves has the capital necessary to sustain the people. This is refuting Marx’s optimistic belief on human nature and his claim that people are inherently good to maintain and sustain a society through their moral and work ethics that they do not need the government’s help to maintain their communities. Marx probably view that by taking down the bourgeoisie and capitalists, the ruling class now will be the working class in which the society can still sustain itself because the government still can support the people through the capital the government has an the industries and commerce that are still producing goods to sell.…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke Economist In modern time, economies that are alive and well today are based off of the teachings of centuries of different countries methods and a handful of philosophers. John Locke is one of those philosophers, another one of those famous philosophers was Adam Smith. Both Adam Smith and John Locke were great economists during their times. John Locke focused more on natural rights for citizens and having a government to serve the people.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In every society there must be a ruling class and the oppressed classes, who obviously would have conflicting interests. Marx believed that there were three primary classes the aristocracy, the bourgeoisie,…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1) The two sides of Adam Smith is that he was a economist and a philosopher of ethics. He created a book called “Theory of Moral Sentiments” which is a develop comprehensive and version of moral sentimentalism. When he was a economist he had created a book called “The Wealth of Nations”. 2.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Outline On Adam Smith

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jack McCabe Composition 12 Mr. Benson 24 October 2016 Adam Smith’s Significant Life I. Thesis and Overview Out of the many historically significant people from the 1700’s, Adam Smith should be considered as one of the most significant from that time. He was born in 1723 in Scotland, in the fishing town of Kirkcaldy. He lived with his cousins and mother because his father had passed away before he was born.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution aimed to create a communist society in the USSR based on Marxism, however due to several reasons, the society (and state) they formed was different from the one envisioned by Marx. Marxism, in essence, is Karl Marx’s political ideology whereas communism is a society (and a political system) based on that ideology. The research paper explores this thesis by a comparative analysis of Marxist doctrines and its application as carried out by Lenin and his successors in the ‘Socialist’ USSR. In the above context, central questions that would be addressed would revolve around whether the communists were able to establish a classless society in the Soviet Union? Was the formation of a communist society…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith Research Paper

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Adam Smith was a Scottish moral philosopher and an innovator of political economy and contemporary capitalist economic system, who lived during the early 18th century. Many of Smith’s ideas and theories are still used in modern economics, several including the effect of self-interest, self-love and selfishness affected. Because Smith’s theories and ideas were the most methodical and comprehensive study of economics up until that time, his economic thinking became the foundation for classical economics. And because several of his ideas have outlasted those of any other economist, such as select ideas from writings such as "Theory of Moral Sentiments" and "The Wealth of Nations" he was considered to be an innovator of political economy. The following…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the eighteenth century, Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations said that the individuals right to pursue his own interests are the driving force within a healthy market that would allow for the spread of abundance to all. He postulated that it was the desire to accumulate stock and then increase that stock that caused men to pay others for their labor (Wealth of Nations 14). Man’s self-interest directed towards the multiplication of this own stock and thus his own wealth. Therefore, men must own the stock they risk. Liberty in the market is derived from owning property.…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith describes a modern and efficient economy as one in which citizens have specialized skills that they are able to exchange for goods and services from others. Smith’s writings on this topic contributed to his title as the “Father of Modern Economics”, however, in addition to economics, Smith also wrote extensively about morality. The Theory of Moral Sentiments begins with a description of sympathy and how it contributes to a morally just society. It is evident from these two works that Smith aimed for society to have relatively unified moral and economic visions. However, modern society has not lived up to the standards put forth by Smith, largely because his ideas were questioned and then pushed aside through…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays