Absolute Monarchy In Ivan The Terrible

Improved Essays
With a name like Ivan the Terrible, it is hard to deny the possibility of Ivan IV reigning as the supreme absolute monarch. Despite his numerous bouts of psychosis and general instability, he was a ruthless ruler who would achieve what he desired by any means necessary, with absolute devotion to his state and his faith.

One of the essential qualities of an absolute monarch is obtaining and maintaining full control of the lowly peasantry. Such a task may seem so simple, but without strict control of the lower classes, any monarchy can be overthrown due to the large numbers and sheer determination of said peasants. Ivan the Terrible accomplished this vital task early on in his reign and kept this control throughout, enforcing it strictly and even expounding upon previous laws later in his life. For example, in 1581, Ivan issued an official order that prevented peasants in certain areas from even leaving their land, effectively locking them in and forbidding any movement. The overall quality of life for peasants worsened significantly throughout the duration of Ivan's reign, although, their lives were not exactly simple and joyous before his rule.
…show more content…
Ivan went about this matter by effectively requiring forced military conscription. In 1556, Ivan required the boyars and princes in Muscovy who still held private lands to serve in the state calvary, along with any of their personal slave soldiers. This military service requirement removed the collective independence from the Russian nobility class, rendering them dependent on their ruler. Ivan's control of the nobility also doubled to control the peasantry, as many of them previously worked for the nobility on their lands. Seeing as their lands were no longer their lands and now belonged to the Russian government, control of the peasants was easier than ever

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For hundreds of years, civilizations have depended on rulers to manage the people and prevent anarchy from erupting. While some leaders execute these actions with ease, others fail to do so and often lose their states to opposing rulers or forces. Niccoló Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher who lived from 1469 to 1527, describes in his book, The Prince, the characteristics he deems necessary in a strong ruler. Throughout the book, Machiavelli uses leaders of his time, like Cesare Borgia and King Louis XII, as examples of what a person should or should not do in order to maintain or improve his state. However, a more recent leader who exemplifies the qualities outlined by Machiavelli is King Louis XIV of France, as he was content with being…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In class, we defined autocracy as a system of government with a single ruler, for example, the Tsar. Autocracy can be beneficial in some instances, such as when decisions need to be made quickly without consulting with a large group of people. Autocracy sometime requires strong leader in order to get things accomplished quickly and efficiently. Autocracy in Russia can be seen as a progressive as: Peter the Great attempts to establish Russia as a great nation through reforms, Catherine the Great’s education reform, and her believe that autocracy is the most suitable for Russia due to its size.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was Louis XIV Successful? The Great Louis XIV reigned as a successful king in France from 1643 through 1715. Louis was considered the embodiment of an “absolute” monarch, because of his need for sole power and ruling. As Louis started his reign, many things needed to be changed, from being a disconnected age, to a integrate procedure. He commenced this process by taking full power over France and converting to only one religion.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Russia, Peter the Great ruled from 1689-1725. He embodied absolutism because he both strengthened the central government and reduced the power of the nobility. He reorganized the government and created a Senate to administer the state. He divided Russia into different provinces to make administration more effective. He forced all landholders to serve in the military or another civil service position.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This quote, “It is my great desire to reform my subjects, and yet I am ashamed to confess that I am unable to reform myself,” from Peter the Great, shows the sophistication he possessed, and also reflects the attention that he gave to Russia in order to reform it into a better society. Obviously, since he was called Peter “the Great,” he must have influenced history. This is shown through the fact that he was mainly successful in completely overhauling Russia and its economy, government, and society and left a lasting impression that the world would forever feel. Before discussing the breakthroughs that Peter brought, it is also important to note how he rose to power. He was born in Moscow in 1672, with the name of Pyotr Alekseyevic.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An absolute monarchy could only be successful under the leadership of an extraordinary ruler who had complete power over his people. An absolute monarch should be able to overachieve the abundance of obstacles placed in front of him. King Louis XIV was able to obtain much of his prodigious power by creating a new, modernized army. Louis was an exceptional mastermind at trade and he had dramatically increased France’s revenue. These actions allowed him to have the unique ability to create such a powerful army.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Catherine The Great Dbq

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Despite ruling amongst other monarchs during the time, Catherine the Great deserves to be crowned the absolutist of them all based off of her control of the nobility and peasantry, taxes and government spending, and the Russian military, throughout Russia’s Golden Age. During her rule, Catherine II gave more power and rights to the nobility and allowed for the continuation of serfdom to maintain her rule as Russia’s monarch. In addition, she brought reform to the Russian society by introducing a more affordable education and become a patron of arts. She appointed military experts to lead the military into gaining parts of Poland and lands around the Black Sea, that allowed for an increased in Russia’s trade with other empires of the time.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Autocracy In Russia Essay

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A crisis of modernization was one of the many reasons that caused the collapse of the autocracy in Russia, and the first step to allowing Lenin and the Bolshevik party to eventually gain control of the state. In the 19th century, Russia was one of the largest and most backward states on the European continent. The peasants of the country remained serfs until the mid-1800s, and even when they gained their freedom, they were enslaved to debt and redemption payments to their landlords that they would never be able to pay back. When they gained their freedom and were given small plots of land, the legal ties peasants did have to the states were weakened as nobles enhanced their own rights. This left peasants feeling even more detached from their…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russian Peasants

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How far do you agree that life for peasants was uniformly bleak during the period from 1855 to 1956? By 1956, the Russian peasantry had finally been liberated by Khrushchev as he had introduced passports and finally given them identification. This was a massive step from what peasant life was like in the 1850’s – where serfdom was the most dominant form of relation between the peasants and the nobility, meaning that peasants in Russia were bound under the rules and regulations of the higher classes and their freedom of movement was restricted. It is clear, however, that for the majority of this period, living conditions for an average Russian peasant did remain somewhat austere regardless of how important Peasants were seen to be. The peasants…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This much power was a lot for one man to possess. With this sole form of government there is no check or balance on the king’s power; he answers to himself alone. It is for these reasons that a monarchy is not always the best form…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Downfall

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Because of his role in the war as the Supreme Commander, his people began to blame him for the military defeats and also the economic conflicts. This intensified the political disillusionment about Tsar Nicholas’s rule over Russia. Thus, Tsar Nicholas’s poor…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Frederick the Great became king of Prussia in 1740, his reign as absolute monarch was unique and unlike no other. An absolute monarch is a king or queen whose actions are restricted neither by written law nor by custom. The goals of an absolute monarch are to create a successful army, improve the economy, centralize government, and pacify nobility. These are all important because they make the country stronger and more successful because they can protect themselves, make money, and have a strong and successful ruler. Although there are many great absolute monarchs, Frederick the Great of Prussia is the greatest absolute monarch, because he was a military genius, he listened to his people, he changed Prussia’s justice system, and he worked to…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A quote from a peasant woman in the reign of Alexander II illustrates how the peasants were heavily taxed “O, wretched is our life, little our land, great are our taxes, and we do not know what to do”. The raised taxation made many peasants destitute, along with the poll tax which, according to Kotsonis, “remained the largest single direct tax, and by now it fell exclusively on peasants”. Alexander efficaciously made the peasants situation worse than when they were under serfdom. Leontovitsch deeply supports this suggesting that peasants had financial burdens after the emancipation as “Immediately after the emancipation, taxes and redemption payments were higher than the income that could be derived from the allotment land”. This can be viewed as superficial, Alexander II sought change, in his coronation Manifesto he planned reform, Karesh and Hurvitz state “Many poor people in Russia benefited: back taxes were cancelled, tax exemptions granted, better distribution of poll tax announced”.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many definitions to define what an absolute ruler is. An absolute ruler is someone that has complete authority over the government and the lives of the people that they govern. Absolute rulers should have a strong control over their land and people without having too many negative effects from their actions. Out of the absolute rulers that were studied, I think that Akbar the Great was the strongest absolute ruler. Even though Akbar the Great was illiterate, he was still a strong ruler through his political views, his economic reforms and tolerance of other religions.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Peasant Revolution In Russia

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    At this time the peasants were rising up against their feudal overlords protesting the growing economic oppression under the nobles and clergy. In 1861 the serfs were freed and issued with small amounts of land, but in return they had to pay back a sum to the government, and the result ended in a mass of small farms deeply in debt. Their life was a sharp contrast to the rich landowners, who held 20% of the land in large estates. Until 1861 they belonged to their masters, who could buy and sell them like cattle. They demanded the abolishment of serfdom and feudal dues.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays