EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Plaintiff, ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC. dba ABERCROMBIE KIDS, Defendant, 2013, p. 4 line 2). The Look Policy requires employees to model Abercrombie-style clothes and keep their style in line with the “East Coast Collegiate style” that the company makes clothes for (U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Plaintiff, ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC. dba ABERCROMBIE KIDS, Defendant., 2013, p. 3 line 16). By wearing these types of clothes, the employees themselves become marketing for the company, and it is essential to the marketing strategy for employees to adhere to this (U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Plaintiff, ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC. dba ABERCROMBIE KIDS, Defendant., 2013, p. 4 line 2) However, Abercrombie has made several exceptions to the Look Policy, on a case-by-case basis (U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Plaintiff, ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC. dba ABERCROMBIE KIDS, Defendant., 2013, p. 4 line 25). As long as the employee is willing to largely wear the right type of clothes, Abercrombie has accommodated several religious needs, including accommodations for religious hijabs in some cases (U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Plaintiff, ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC. dba ABERCROMBIE KIDS, Defendant., 2013, p. 4 line 25). Though there was an opportunity for Ms. Banafa to wear a headscarf in compliance with Abercrombie’s core colors in their Look Policy, this option was not explored, and instead, Ms. Banafa was passed over for the job because she did not suit the “Abercrombie look” (U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Plaintiff, ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC. dba ABERCROMBIE KIDS, Defendant., 2013, p. 6 line 13). Since there are many ways to accommodate Ms. Banafa’s hijab without violating the marketing strategy, this does not qualify as a Bona-Fide Occupational
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Plaintiff, ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC. dba ABERCROMBIE KIDS, Defendant, 2013, p. 4 line 2). The Look Policy requires employees to model Abercrombie-style clothes and keep their style in line with the “East Coast Collegiate style” that the company makes clothes for (U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Plaintiff, ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC. dba ABERCROMBIE KIDS, Defendant., 2013, p. 3 line 16). By wearing these types of clothes, the employees themselves become marketing for the company, and it is essential to the marketing strategy for employees to adhere to this (U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Plaintiff, ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC. dba ABERCROMBIE KIDS, Defendant., 2013, p. 4 line 2) However, Abercrombie has made several exceptions to the Look Policy, on a case-by-case basis (U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Plaintiff, ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC. dba ABERCROMBIE KIDS, Defendant., 2013, p. 4 line 25). As long as the employee is willing to largely wear the right type of clothes, Abercrombie has accommodated several religious needs, including accommodations for religious hijabs in some cases (U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Plaintiff, ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC. dba ABERCROMBIE KIDS, Defendant., 2013, p. 4 line 25). Though there was an opportunity for Ms. Banafa to wear a headscarf in compliance with Abercrombie’s core colors in their Look Policy, this option was not explored, and instead, Ms. Banafa was passed over for the job because she did not suit the “Abercrombie look” (U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Plaintiff, ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC. dba ABERCROMBIE KIDS, Defendant., 2013, p. 6 line 13). Since there are many ways to accommodate Ms. Banafa’s hijab without violating the marketing strategy, this does not qualify as a Bona-Fide Occupational