John Rawls Theory Of Justice Essay

Superior Essays
John Rawls was born in 1921, he was recognized as a huge leading proponent of liberalism, which is belief in the value of social and political change in order to achieve progress. (Johnson Encyclopedia). It is to believed that there are two important life events that shaped Rawls’s philosophical work. He lost two younger brothers, one to diphtheria and the other to pneumonia. He also serves as in soldier in the pacific during the last two years of World War II. “These experiences also most likely influenced the development of his vison of justice…” (Johnson Encyclopedia). Rawls used these important events in his life to shape his ideas and they help create the perspective he gives us in his writings. These two experiences helped developed the vision of justice Rawls had for those who were less fortunate than others. In 1971, Rawls published his first major piece of work “A Theory of Justice”. “…Arguing that choices of principle concerning the basic structure of society should …show more content…
The question is, is fairness the same a justice or do we have to decide whether fairness or justice is more important to have a better society? Rawls wants everything to be fair, but if it takes away money from those who make a higher income, then is it really justice? When I hear the word justice, I think of the law; it is something that is the same for everyone and does not change. It can be good in some ways, but can also be a very negative thing. Laws are made to make sure everyone follows the same rules, but there are some rules that are inevitably broken by some people, and it is unfair that they get in trouble because of that law. The problem with fairness is just because something is fair to one person may not seem fair to another. People tend to see what others have and want it instead of what they have even though they have their fair

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    An act that John Rawls would disagree with is the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was passed 2001 and it allows the government to wire tape and surveillance people who are suspected of terrorist related activities linked to terrorist groups. John Rawls would find this act unjust, because it violates individuals right to privacy and allows the government is profile “suspected” individuals. This act also opens to the door to allow the government to abuse their power, by spying on citizens. I would partially agree with Rawls for finding this act unjust however I think the patriot act is in the best interest for everyone.…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that a person's liberty is what is most important and should be a priority. The second principle is called the “Difference Principle” which requires social and economic inequalities to be modified so that they can produce an outcome that is fair and equal to all. Rawls’ notion of justice as fairness demands that distribution of the goods of society should be consciously structured in order to provide a fair distribution. His last argument ensures that no one is advantaged or disadvantaged in society, this is called the social contract theory. The “original position” is the main component on Rawls’ social contract account of justice, it allows us to figure out what principle of justice people in society would agree to if we lived in a society of total freedom.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mass incarceration also creates a social hierarchy with Blacks being at the bottom because of being labeled a drug addict/user and a criminal, which in Rawls’ perspective is an injustice because its placing certain individuals higher than others. Rawls would view the situation the same as he viewed distribution of wealth and income, except the moral inquiry would now be the distribution of a negative good which would be punishment among individuals pertaining particularly to certain racial groups. Therefore, if Rawls proposed a solution, it would be that although there would still be some type of punishment institution to house those who are a severe threat to the community in order to protect society, we would choose arrangements that would respect the humanity of each individual. Also he would also examine the “social division of responsibility” between society and individuals. For example when we are about to arrest or convict an individual for possessing or deal drugs, one must also consider everything to ensure that each individual continues to face a decent opportunity for a good life.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If ancient Athenian society followed the conception of justice idolized by Rawls, would Socrates find himself in the predicament that he faced in Crito? The answer to that question, is absolutely not, because of how those principles are set. The first principle of Rawls states “Each person is to have an equal right . . . similar liberty for others.”…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his work, Theory of Justice, John Rawls describes two principles in which he describes his theory for distributive justice. Rawls interprets the goods described in distributive justice as the power and wealth that stem from institutional positions. The first principle asserts that, “each individual has an equal right to the most extensive liberty compatible with like liberty for all”. (503)…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am here to discuss the reasons why the individual would choose to pick life without possibility of parole in the case of a robber killing a store owner and being charged with 2nd degree murder. With the case of the individual jury person one of the things about him is that one of his children is in law enforcement, this little amount of evidence shows why he would choose life without parole is because he respects the law and the punishment of the judicial system, defendant shown as a threat to society and he had a weapon. After the veil of ignorance the position is still the same because we believe that the defendant will be a danger to society and needs to be locked up from the public.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Charles Mills Democracy

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This, he writes, is a hypothetical situation where political decision makers are rational, do not care about the affairs of their peers, have a sense of justice and what is good, and operate under a veil of ignorance. It is this same hypothetical veil of ignorance which is both the most important element to this theory working, but also what breaks it. Under a veil of ignorance, those making decisions on behalf of society will not know who they are going to be in said society. This, Rawls states, leads them to make moral decisions which, if anything, work to the advantage of the least fortunate. Unfortunately, as effective as this may actually be in addressing the issues with democracy today, there is no real way to carry this out in the real world.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As I stated above, Rawls indicated that everyone be given equal rights no matter the circumstances. He also implied, that the disadvantage should be given a chance to improve, and I couldn’t agree more. If people aren’t given a chance how are they supposed to improve in…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls in his book Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (2001) characterizes how idealized reasoners, reason in order to validate the two “principles of justice” (42) in a “basic structure” (10) leading to a “well-ordered society” (8). The idealized reasoners do some kind of calculation. With the “original position” (14) and the “veil of ignorance” (15) idealized reasoners can understand the “difference principle” (61). This is an important element of creating a well-ordered society. Mills finds issue with how Rawls uses this ideal as something we should follow.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Before Rawls’s conception of justice and the difference principle, the utilitarian principle was often used in politics justifying inequalities if they made all of us better off. Rawls twist on this is that it is not enough that it should make all of us better off it must make the worst off as well off as possible. Rawls believed in justice…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The theory of justice purposed by Rawls may be mainly egalitarian, however, it allows for inequalities which he views as essential to promote the advancement of economically productive capabilities. These purposed inequalities are consistent with justice since they fulfill the difference principle, by maximally advancing the position of the worst off group within society (Rawls, 1971). These inequalities can only be essential and justified if the group of talented people are incapable of developing their skills without them. An example of this would be those people who experience stressful education need more expensive forms of leisure in order to be competent of completing such task. Cohen indicates that it's the talented group themselves that make these inequalities possible, therefore it is necessary to give them these incentives or they could protest to increase their economic productivity without them.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, fairness is promoting the freedom of thought and putting equality among all. Rousseau’s ideal society is fair only if the general will of the people is aligned with promoting the equal basic liberties. If not, the ideal society will not be fair under Rawls’ lens because they are not promoting those basic liberties important to Rawls. Nevertheless, this society would be fair under Rawls because the “general will” drives it. Rawls believes that fairness comes from the consensus of the society saying what is fair.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls theory of social justice developed over time with the publishing of various books he wrote, such as A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism. In A Theory of Justice, he determines the “Circumstances of Justice.” These circumstances assume justice applies to a “definite geographical territory and that the subjects of justice are “roughly similar in…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Rawls Thought Model

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay, I will detail the thought experiment of John Rawls known as “the original position,” the two principles of justice he believes this thought experiment results in, and, lastly, consider one objection to his claims. I argue that Rawls’ thought experiment offers a decent starting point to consider matters of justice and/or good and bad in society, but becomes compromised when we are asked to presume members behind the “veil of ignorance” do not know their conceptions of good. In A Theory of Justice, John Rawls considers the role of justice in society and posits a simple conception of just society. In Rawls’ view, justice depends upon a “scheme of cooperation” that enables all in society to achieve an agreeable existence, or the…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout the piece, “justice as fairness” serves as the basis for the liberal approach to citizenship: Justice as fairness is intended as a political conception of justice. While a political conception of justice is, of course a moral conception… justice as fairness framed to apply to what I have called the ‘basic structure’ of a modern constitutional democracy. By this structure I mean such a society’s main political, social, and economic institutions, and how they fit together into one unified system of social cooperation. In other words, Rawls believes that a democracy will most efficiently function when each citizen develops their own moral conception of justice and go on to agreeably pursue these conceptions through diverse plans of action.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays