• Home Page
  • Analysis Of Judith Jarvis Thomson's A Defense Of Abortion

Analysis Of Judith Jarvis Thomson's A Defense Of Abortion

Improved Essays
Show More
-Judith Jarvis Thomson is a moral philosopher, who wrote A Defense of Abortion in1971. This piece of writing is still causing uproar even in the present time over the continuous argument of abortion. She is for abortion in the right circumstances, and in order to fight the people against her, she wrote this piece of writing. In this text, she states that a fetus is not a person and does not have the right to life, but in order to fight against objections towards her she agrees that a fetus is a person, only for the sake of this argument.She is saying that the usual argument against abortion is “all persons have a right to life, a fetus is a person, therefore they have right to life, therefore abortion is wrong.”. She says yes they are a life …show more content…
One objection is that no matter the circumstance you are pulling the trigger on a life. It doesn't matter the time you are stopping a life and preventing its right to life. Now that you are pregnant it is your responsibility to cherish this life and take care of it. You cannot end this life and say it is justified. Just like pulling the trigger of a gun you are not first-hand killing a person, but you are making the choice that ends in a person's death or harm.If you are okay with abortion you are okay with all murder. Another argument is that even if you don't want this child some other family could adopt this child and make the family complete. This abbey has right to happiness even if with another family. Abortion is not the answer, there is adoption. My last objection towards Thomson is that it is the woman's fault that they are pregnant they need to accept the consequences.Even with contraception, there is a small chance that you accept. By having sex you are agreeing to take the risk. Now because that risk came up doesn't mean you have the right to have an abortion. You agreed to risk now this is your

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Right Balance Of The Fetus Case Study
    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Right Balance Of The Fetus Case Study

    First we must decide if the fetus is indeed a person or not. Munson states, “The claim of the fetus as a person must be given weight and respect in deliberating about any action that would terminate its life” (Munson, p. 456). If we rule that a fetus is a person, then abortion would be a case of unjust killing (Munson, p.456). So, if a fetus is a person it, like all human beings, has the right to life and one without harm. This relates back to cases like that of Tabita Bricci.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Judith Jarvis Thomson's Comparison: Abortion And Personhood Belomson
    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Judith Jarvis Thomson's Comparison: Abortion And Personhood Belomson

    There is often a large dispute over abortion and when personhood begins. Some believe it is at fertilization, some think that it is a vague concept, and some believe that it is when the child is born. The common argument against abortion is the claim that the fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life. A philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thomson, believes that even if personhood begins at the stage of being a fetus, there are still times when it is moral to abort the fetus. She believes that personhood begins at a vague time, however she wants to prove even if the fetus is a person, she can provide times when it is still morally permissible to have an abortion.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Noonan's Argument From Probabilities
    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Noonan's Argument From Probabilities

    1. What is Noonan 's "Argument from Probabilities?" How does this argument work, and what does he think it implies about the morality or immorality of abortion? The argument from probabilities is not aimed at establishing an objective discontinuity which may be taken into account in moral disclosure.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of A Defense Of Abortion By Thomson
    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary Of A Defense Of Abortion By Thomson

    In ‘A Defense of Abortion’, Thomson argues for the fact that there are certain cases where abortion is permissible and certain cases where abortion is impermissible. Thomson starts her argument by explaining that people contemplate their views on abortion by trying to determine a specific time period of when a fetus is considered a human being – some believe this is at contraception and others believe this is at birth. Whatever the case, Thomson uses an analogy of an acorn to demonstrate a pro-choice view. She relates that the development of an acorn into an oak tree does in fact not mean that acorns are oak trees. Much like how we cannot say that a recently fertilized egg is a human being.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Don Marquis's 'Why Abortion Is Immoral'
    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis Of Don Marquis's 'Why Abortion Is Immoral'

    Marquis argues in favor of this assumption because he believes that it is wrong to kill a fetus because it has a future of value like ours and depriving it of that future makes the vast of abortions immoral. On the other hand, Thomson’s argument rejects this assumption because she insists that under some circumstances abortion is permissible and moral. As mentioned above, she argues that the right to life of a fetus does not outweigh the right to use one’s body. So after analyzing Thomson’s argument, the answer to this question is that the vast majority of abortions are not immoral because in both the extreme and typical case, the woman has the choice of assuming responsibility for the fetus. So the morality of abortion according to Thomson depends on whether the killing is unjust and not the moral status of the fetus.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Response To Marquis On Abortion
    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Response To Marquis On Abortion

    Marquis argues that killing a fetus deprives it of a valuable future/future like ours, and concludes by saying abortion is not morally permissible. I agree with Marquis’ argument that it is wrong to kill a fetus through abortion because I believe that they have a valuable future as all humans do. While I agree with Marquis that majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral, I do believe that in some cases it is permissible. For instance, choosing to have an abortion after being sexually assaulted or due to life threatening circumstances would be acceptable reasons for having an abortion. Being that the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses that can occur, I strongly concur with Marquis’s argument.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis's Argument That Abortion Is Wrong?
    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Don Marquis's Argument That Abortion Is Wrong?

    Don Marquis argues in his article An Argument that Abortion is Wrong that abortion, except in specific rare instances is seriously wrong. He bases this claim off of the principle that killing any innocent human being is wrong. While the central point of most pro-choice individuals is that women should have the right to control their body, Marquis argues that the right of the unborn fetus outweighs the right for a woman to control her body. Before supporting his thesis Marquis lays out one of the main problems in the abortion debate. People in favor of abortion often have a very narrow view on what constitutes a person and this is problematic because it leaves out infants, severely retarded and mentally ill individuals.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Mary Elizabeth Williams's So What If Abortion Ends Life
    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mary Elizabeth Williams's So What If Abortion Ends Life

    When a woman becomes cognizant of their pregnancy, there are two choices available to her; keeping the fetus or aborting the fetus. I think the latter option is absurd. Why hurt yourself physically, mentally, and emotionally to get rid of a life inside of you? It makes no sense. Also, have you seen an abortion performed?…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Judith Jarvis Thomson's A Defense Of Abortion: Comparison
    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judith Jarvis Thomson's A Defense Of Abortion: Comparison

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Mary George's View Of Abortion Analysis
    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mary George's View Of Abortion Analysis

    Mr. George, however, makes a careless statement, “Frequently, people who are not religious, or who are only weakly so, begin to have doubts about the moral defensibility of deliberate feticide.” (187) Too me he is saying that just because a person isn’t religious they are more frequent to get an abortion than someone who is? Mary Gordon, on the other hand, believes that abortion should be legalized or that it shouldn’t be restricted. Gordon states, “It is essential that we remember that an abortion is performed on a living woman who has a life in which a terminated pregnancy is only a small part.” (188) I think that is a great point.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    On The Wrong Of Abortion Patrick Lee Analysis
    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On The Wrong Of Abortion Patrick Lee Analysis

    In Patrick Lee’s and Robert P. George’s, On The Wrong of Abortion, it is argued that abortions are objectively immoral. To support this conclusion, Lee and George state that, the fetus is a complete person in an immature phase of development, that the fetus has the potential to develop into a “person” and that abortions are intentional killings. Pro-Choice defenders argue that a human fetus is not a human being because it cannot live on its own, that they are not ‘people’, and that the mother has the executive decision of not wanting the child in her uterus. According to Patrick Lee in another one of his works, The Pro-Life Argument from Substantial Identity: A Defence. Bioethics , He claims that “What makes it wrong to kill you or me now would…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion Right To Life Analysis
    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Abortion Right To Life Analysis

    In one of his points he mentions the innocent-human-life perspective which states the syllogism “1. All innocent human beings have the right to life, 2. All human fetuses are innocent human beings, 3. Therefore, all human fetuses have the right to life.”. Another one of his points when arguing with singer Mary Anne Warren who stated “being a person in terms of the traits of consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity, the capacity to communicate, and the presence of self-concepts, nothing, too, that her characterization of personhood” a person must have these at least some of these in order to be consider a person and therefore fetus’s lack the right to life because they don’t have these traits.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Brilliant Essays

    Judith Thomson's A Defense Of Abortion By Judith Thomson
    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    Judith Thomson's A Defense Of Abortion By Judith Thomson

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophical Critique On Abortion
    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Philosophical Critique On Abortion

    Philosophical critique on the traditional argument against abortion Robert Bertram - UBC ID: 24675373 Phil 333 (001) - Biomedical Ethics The University of British Columbia The concept of morality in relation to abortion is a significant cause of conflict. These moral ambiguities are put into question by Pope John Paul II’s excerpts on the “unspeakable crime of abortion” with regards to the validity, committed fallacies, and the fetus’s content to the right to life (Paul II, 1995, pg. 1). Paul II's Evangelium Vitae (1995), states that aborting a fetus is the "deliberate and direct killing...of a human being in the initial phase of his or her existence". In the paragraphs to follow, this essay will reconstruct the argument, and analyze Thomson's, and Warren's objection to Paul II's statement.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    In Defense Of Abortion Essay
    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Defense Of Abortion Essay

    In today’s societies around the world, there is currently two factions of the highly controversial topic of abortion and whether it should be allowed or outlawed. These two factions on opposite sides are pro-choice and pro-life. Pro-choice supporters in essence believes a woman has the right to an abortion if she decides to do so. On the other hand, pro-life supporters believe the fetus is its own human being and has the right to live, thus an abortion cannot be performed on the woman. Judith Jarvis Thomson, a philosophy professor supports the right to an abortion in her paper, “A defense of Abortion” (186).…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings