1975 Milgram Experiment

Great Essays
In 1975 Milgram directed an experiment to study whether the Nazi killings in world war II carried out by the Germans, was due to the fact that the Germans were obedient to authority figures as this was the most common justification. Milgram devised the experiment to answer the question "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?
The acts committed of the genocide at World War II were scrutinised and studied. How far were people willing to take orders and carry them out even if it involved harming another person and how easily were they influenced? This was the foundation of his interest.
Therefore, Milgram conducted a study in which he recruited male participants through advertising in a newspaper which took place at Yale University. The participant was paired with another person to find out who would be the ‘learner’ and who would be the ‘teacher’. However, the draw was fixed so that the participant was always the teacher, and the learner was a confederate (pretending to be a real participant).
They both received a list of word pairs; however the learner was attached to an electric chair in another room and was tested on the word pairs by the confederate. Each time the learner got an answer wrong, a shock
…show more content…
Here we shun our responsibility and we no longer consider our own behaviour. He believed that the participants were 'just following orders' and did not reflect or hold themselves responsible for what they were doing. It is the psychological state the obedient subject is in, when he or she is obeying authority. In this essay, evidence will be used to discuss whether individuals enter the agentic state when the individuals are submissive from different

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    On the animation or slideshow, there were three main participants which were the authority,the teacher and student. The authority encouraged the teacher to conduct the acts of the experiment as to the student is responsible for memorizing the words. If the student fails, he is then shocked with a progression of high volts. This experiment can be discussed as both ethical and unethical . The people volunteered and were advised of the process which would make the experiment ethical.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s Obedience Study Milgram’s original motive for executing this ethics breaking experiment was to learn why the German people allowed the murder of millions of Jewish people during the Holocaust. Stanley Milgram wanted to learn as to how people can listen to authority and break their personal morals to follow someone that they believe to be control. During the Holocaust, Nazis led a massacre of millions of Jewish people without letting personal values, such as compassion, stop them from committing this crime. In a general perspective, Milgram wanted to understand the effect of authority and how far people would go to obey authority under extremely conflicting circumstances. If I were placed in this experiment under the teacher position,…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Holocaust, which was the systematic persecution and murder of over six million Jews during World War II, is often cited as one of the worst atrocities committed in the history of human civilization. People speak of it in hushed, mournful voices as they wonder at how the German Nazis could be so malevolent as to annihilate a whole generation of Jews. Hundreds of eminent scholars have eloquently explained the horrific nature of the Holocaust and its effects on the modern world (Gerstenfeld). Yet, it can be said that emphasis should be placed on understanding why Adolf Hitler decided to exterminate so many Jews. Only by looking through the perspective of the Nazis can one begin to understand that the Nazi Party and its leader, Hitler, brutally…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An experiment should not cause any harm to its participants, even if it is not physical, but mental. In the defense of Milgram, however, the debrief of the participants afterwards usually ensured a decrease in their stress level due to the knowledge that the learner was safe from harm. Therefore, the effects of tension were only short-term, and the debriefing usually solved their problems. The participants were assured that their behavior was common and that they were not sadistic or horrible people. About 83.7% of people stated that they were happy to be involved in the experiment, and only 1.3% wished that they hadn't gone through the experiment.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason many individuals become fascinated with the topic of the Holocaust is due to the question, how could a well-educated nation allow the mass extermination of innocent civilians. Christopher Browning is one of many historians who has tried to understand how the Holocaust could occur. In the book Ordinary Men, Browning focuses on Reserve Police Battalion 101, who were question about their role in the 1940s. After analyzing the information found in the investigation, Browning comes to the conclusion that individuals without any military background such as, Reserve Police Battalion 101, could kill innocent civilians because of their duty to follow orders not for blood lust. Reserve Police Battalion 101 consisted of men who came from different classes of within Nazi Germany.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ordinary Men Book Review

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Abby Mangefrida History 339 April 2, 2017 Ordinary Men Christopher Browning’s Ordinary Men follows the tasks of Police Battalion 101, a division of the Nazi paramilitary Order Police, which operated as a mass execution squad from 1941 to 1942. The battalion consisted of primarily working class middle aged men of German descent. The majority of the men were neither Nazi party members nor people with military or police experience. Their selection for the Order Police was largely due to their age, deemed too old to fight in the German army.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram proposed that people operate on two levels. First, they operate as autonomous individuals, where they act according to their own values and beliefs. Second, they act on an agentic level where they see themselves as agents, acting on behalf of somebody else and not responsible for their own actions. He asserted that it is possible to move from an autonomous state into an agentic state; this is referred to as an agentic shift (Milgram, 1963). A consequence of this shift is that an individual no longer feels responsible for their actions.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority is one of the best known studies in social psychology. It was repeated several times in different variations. These replications extended our knowledge about the phenomenon of complying to authorities’ orders. One of them was the experiment conducted by Hofling et al. This essay will outline the similarities and differences between these two studies.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Obedience to authority is a huge impact on a person’s morality. To further extend this idea the question on why do people with strong values, principles, ethics challenge and go against their morals when faced with an authority figure needs to be asked.. Many ideas are produced when asked this question; the focus will be on the internal forces that push someone to do something they normally would not do. Fear, conformality, and other internal experiences such as responsibility among others fuel the obedience to authority and change the way a person behaves. Michael Shermer and Saul Mcleod both provide extensive information on the stimulus of the obedience.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baurind Experiment Analysis

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    The chief differentiation between his experiment and the Holocaust, she says, is the participants in the experiment displayed some form of sympathy toward the victims. However, Baumrind does not display any support to her claims; her statement would hold more validity if she would include more details and, possibly, examples of how the experiment and the Holocaust differ. Similarly, Parker refers to author Daniel Goldhagen who wrote Hitler’s Willing Executioners. In his book, Goldhagen discusses “how the crimes of the Holocaust were carried out by people obeying their own consciences, not blindly or fearfully obeying orders” (237). Parker also illustrates a theory as to why Milgram compared his experiment to the Holocaust.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiments created great controversy. They showed how vulnerable humans were to the will bending power of authority. This idea especially stuck around the time the experiment took place, the early 1960’s. America was still somewhat fresh off of World War II, and Americans were shocked to see that they were just as capable of being pushed to do things that went against their morals as Germans were under Nazi authorities. Milgram was thorough in his studies by including multiple permutations of the original where he tested subjects responses to different forms of authority.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This group of well-educated individuals included psychiatrists, middle class adults, and faculty members in the human behavioral sciences (1). They held a general consensus: Only one or two of the forty men would likely administer at least 300 volts to the learner, and none of the men (or “only a pathological fringe of about one in a thousand,” as Milgram wrote in his article, “The Perils of Obedience”) would pull the last switches labeled “XXX” (1). These assumptions could not have been further from the truth. Twenty-five of the 40 men continued the experiment to the very end, even after listening to the learner’s shouts of protest, agonized screaming, and, ultimately, ominous silence…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She argues that the experiment was affecting the participant even after they were done and had been de-briefed of what the study was actually about, as well as seeing and talking to the ”learner” (the guy who they thought they were electrocuting). Baumrind was also arguing the fact the the experiment had little ecological validity as subjects are more prone to abide in such environments, she also states that participants experienced long-term, negative psychological consequences as a result of their participation in Milgram’s experiment. Milgram had counterpoints for all of her statements, explaining himself and his thought process and why it was necessary towards the experiment. Baumrind says that Milgram 's experimental situations are not sufficiently accurate models of real-life experience, his sampling techniques are seldom of a scope which would justify the meaning with which he would like to endow his result, as well as result are hard to reproduce. These combined is considered unethical, as this experiment would never have been accepted by any institutions today.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays