12 Angry Men

Decent Essays
Newhall 1
When the movie 12 Angry Men begins, the trial of the 18 year old Puerto Rican boy who was accused of killing his father had ended. The judge gives direction to the 12 jury members, “You’ve listened to the testimony...It’s now your duty to sit down and separate the facts from the fancy. One man is dead, another mans life is at stake. If there is a reasonable doubt in your minds... then you bring me a verdict of not guilty. If, however, there’s no reasonable doubt, then you must...find the accused guilty...”. Once the 12 jurors start to discuss the guilt of the accused youth, they take their first vote; eleven to one in favor of guilty. Juror 8 was the only one to vote for a non- guilty verdict. Juror 8 thinks that there needs to be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Certainty vs. Doubt In “Twelve Angry Men”, 12 jurors are given the tough task to determine if an 18 year old boy is guilty or innocent of murdering his father. A variety of personalities are present at the table as the men discuss the boy’s future. After the jurors cast their vote, it is evident that one juror, juror #8, is the only one who voted not guilty.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis Twelve Angry Men (1957), is the gripping, penetrating, and engrossing examination of a diverse group of twelve jurors. They retire to a jury room to do their civic duty and serve up a just verdict for the indigent minority defendant whose life is in the balance. The film is a powerful indictment, denouncement and expose of the trial by jury system. Many of the jurors had stereotypes about kids who grow up in run down neighborhoods and who belong to certain minority groups. Not only did these stereotypes influence the jurors’ tend to form internal attributions for the boy’s behavior, but these stereotypes also led to biased interpretations of the evidence.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He states that the women do not have much of a choice. Due to this, we see that not much tangible evidence is used in the courts in Salem. On the other hand, 12 Angry Men is set in a time period where words have to be proven to be true in order for someone to be convicted of a crime. Reginald Rose emphasizes the following scene, “(NO. 8 takes the diagram and sets it up on a chair so that all can see it. NO. 8 looks it over.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A significant number of individuals in the world feel great comfort in the truthfulness within life, which means that the truth will always shine through and justice will be served. In 12 Angry Men, the play by Reginald Rose, one character could help that truth shine in front of the rest. In this play, a teenager is accused of killing his father. This play takes place in a New York City jury room, which contains twelve angry jurors trying to unanimously agree on whether the boy is guilty. But Juror Eight rises and pleads that the boy is not guilty and starts to convince each juror one by one to say not guilty.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the drama, 12 Angry Men, the playwright, Reginald Rose, does not believe in the jury system, He explains the jury system in this book and helps readers understand the flaws in the judicial system. Rose also explains the definition of “reasonable doubt” and helps readers have a better understanding and connection to the phrase. Some quotes and specific details from the book that help connect meaning to the phrase “reasonable doubt” is on page 61, where the protagonist, Juror #8 says, “I think it’s logical to say that she was not wearing her glasses in bed, and I don't think she’d put them on to glance casually out the window.she testified that the murder took place the instant she looked out, and that the lights went out a split second later.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Bias

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The trial is about a nine-teen year old boy who is going to get the death penalty if found guilty of brutally murdering his father. The twelve angry men represent the jurors. Jurors have to make a decision if the boy is guilty or not. Juror 10 tends to make biased remarks about the boy and judges him without realizing it. Juror 10 wanted to send the boy to death row since he had wrongfully stereotyped the boy.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rufus Scott is a jazz drummer who begins a relationship with Leona, a Southern white woman, and has a small social circle in which he shares to them about Leona. Their relationship becomes more serious, and Rufus eventually turns “habitually physically abusive” to Leona, causing her to be admitted to a psych ward, resulting in a depressed Rufus who eventually commits suicide (“Another Country (novel)”). His friends and family develop closer relationships, although they are strained throughout the course of the novel. Baldwin’s Another Country explores the complex themes of racism, sexism, and homophobia.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The film also explores the wanton destruction of life that the jury room presents, as well as how easy it is to accuse someone erroneously. Thus,12 Angry Men critiques the legal system by exposing the shortcomings of the jurors themselves. During the course of the film, 12 Angry Men presents the common use of stereotyping and racism. Having a jury of 12 white, middle aged men meant that a broader…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A fundamental aspect of the American justice system is the right of every person accused of a crime, to a trial by jury. The defendant, presumed ‘innocent until proven guilty’, has the right to be judged by a group of his or her peers based on the evidence presented, the assumption being that the defendant will be judged in a fair and impartial manner. However, human beings are fallible and can be subject to faulty reasoning, alongside irrational and biased thinking. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose is set in a mid twentieth century American jury room. Twelve strangers, all male, are brought together to deliberate the facts of a seemingly straightforward case, a young man accused of murdering his father; their decision, which must be unanimous, will either take, or save a young mans life.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men is a compelling and profound film produced in 1957 directed by Sidney Lumet. This film set in a single room with just twelve cast member, these twelve play a jury called together to judge a murder case involving a young boy who is accused of murdering his father. The jury is charged with coming to a unanimous decision because the punishment is death penalty. Throughout the movie the cast is never referred to by name, rather by their jury numbers offering the viewer an air of mystery and intrigue. The film further shows its artistic talent by offering not only a story to challenge the mind but also the audience’s ethical beliefs.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These twelve men of the jury will have to discuss and go over evidence to decide the boy 's fate. When the men sit down in the room it is very obvious that, most of the men do not want to be here. Also majority of the men think the boy is guilty, even without discussing the case. So they all take a vote on what the boys fate will be. Eleven of the jurors say death, but juror number eight votes not guilty.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set in New York, 12 Angry Men follows twelve jurors as they decide whether or not a young 18-year-old Hispanic boy is guilty for stabbing his father in the chest. In a rather small room, the jurors must reach a unanimous decision, and if there is ‘reasonable doubt,’ the young boy will be freed. In one of the initial scenes, a vote is facilitated where 11 jurors find him guilty, and one juror, juror 8 votes that he is not guilty. He expresses to the group that a discussion needs to be made prior to sending a young boy to the death penalty. There is a lack of evidence which supports why the young 18-year-old boy stabbed his father and in turn leaves some of the minds of the jurors in a place where they are unable to convict within moral certainty.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guilty or not guilty is a life threatening question for an eighteen-year-old boy in the film 12 Angry Men who has been tried for a first-degree murder. The eighteen-year-old boy has been accused of stabbing his own father and the case has been left in the hands of a twelve-man jury in which a guilty verdict mean the automatic death of the boy. Throughout the film, we are able to recognize various communication skills that the twelve individuals display. Leadership There are two types of leaders shown in this film. Since the beginning of the film juror number eight demonstrated to be an emergent leader by not being a follower even though he was the only one who pleaded not guilty and was willing to stand alone against the rest of the jury who pleaded guilty.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The movie, 12 Angry Men is about twelve white men deciding the jail sentence of an 18-year old boy who has allegedly committed murder by killing his father. If the men do decide the boy is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt then the boy will be sent to an electric chair for a death sentence. In the very few scenes of the movie all the jurors are summoned into one room and standing towards the door. Juror number 1, also known as the foreman is the leader of the deliberation. He tells everyone to gather around a table and explains that the goal of the day’s deliberation is to vote on the sentence of the boy’s guiltiness and innocence.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics