Why We Will Soon Miss The Cold War Analysis

Improved Essays
“Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.”1 This statement was made by Robert Oppenheimer after the first successful atomic bomb test at Los Alamos, New Mexico. At approximately 08:15 AM on 6 August 1945, the way in which states viewed conflict was forever changed in a dramatic fashion. On that day a US B-29 bomber dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, killing around 80,000 people instantly. Only three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, causing the deaths of 40,000 more. To date, these attacks remain as the only nuclear attacks carried out in history. The devastating effects of these attacks were ultimately enough to put an end to World War II and discourage the use of nuclear weapons in future conflicts. In War, Peace, and International Relations, written by Colin Gray, he examines five different ways in which nuclear weapons have changed the international system. The first being that nuclear weapons made a decisive victory between nuclear powers impossible. The second change that nuclear weapons brought was that because of their power, a state would be unable to use war to achieve political ends with other major …show more content…
Much the same as Colin Gray, he asserts that if nuclear powers properly secure their weapons from attack, neither side can employ nuclear weapons to gain a military advantage. Even if nuclear weapons are preemptively employed, the defender would almost always have the advantage because they would have the support of the international community and possibly other powers. For instance if Russia were to launch a nuclear attack on the US, they would have to be concerned about a counter nuclear attack from both the US and their allies who also have a nuclear capability (UK, France, and possibly Pakistan or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The author argues that these changes have increased the threat of nuclear weapons as Russia has lowered the threshold for using them. Schlosser then brings up an example of NATO in the cold war. NATO used a strategy to disperse tactical weapons to the frontline to deter a Soviet invasion. Schlosser then states that the authorization for firing the weapons was deregulated and thus the threat of the weapons being fired accidently rose substantially.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945, in response to World War II and Japan’s vicious attacks on the U.S., the United States launched the atomic bomb “Little Boy” on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. 80,000 people died, and sixty percent of the city was destroyed. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, in which killed 70,000 people instantaneously and many more in the following weeks. These atomic bombs resulted in pure destruction and chaos for Japan and its people. Although the atomic bombs destroyed part of Japan and took many lives with them, the dropping of the atomic bombs were justified because the U.S. aimed for the complete and utter destruction of Japan and Japan remained a major threat that needed to be eliminated.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jon Wiener’s How We Forgot the Cold War is an engaging tour of American monuments dedicated to the failed remembrance of the Cold War. Through a five-part study guiding the reader through different eras of remembrance, Wiener gives detailed accounts of monuments, memorials, and museums dedicated to the official memory of the Cold War. Conservative thought dominated for much of the book. Through the decades, conservative politicians fought to disseminate their belief of the conflict as a triumph of good over evil and the equation of the defeat of totalitarianism with the defeat of fascism in World War II. Wiener’s travels on the surface are simply a road trip through time and space visiting different sites which remember the conflict in varying…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gaddis focuses on the early-1980s when Reagan 's was re-supplying with guns, missiles, etc and repeated attention-getting talk to the 'Evil Empire ' which caused Moscow to believe that America had advanced plans for a nuclear strike this way the need to prepare would be in that same way. Gaddis also focuses on Dwight Eisenhower 's skillful efforts to avoid a nuclear conflict. For example, Gaddis provides a…

    • 1061 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “The Development of atomic power will provide the nations with new means of destruction. The atomic bombs…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Affirmative Statement The current interventionist foreign policy that has driven the U.S. to accept an overwhelming amount of responsibility for maintaining the global order -- a commitment of such great magnitude that it should not be the burden of a single state, even a superpower such as the U.S. that “dominate[s] the world militarily, economically, and politically” (Posen 117). Emboldened by assumptions of American geopolitical strengths, the U.S. has pursued nation-building operations that serve as a detriment to both the federal budget and their international reputation. Instead, a return to the pre-WWII foreign policy of offshore balancing would reallocate resources from futile nation-building exercises towards preserving American dominance…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    INTRODUCTION Considering the position of America as both the global authoritative superpower and a centrally involved participant in world affairs, any action taken to adjust the current grand strategy will have vast ramifications on all actors in the international system. Ultimately, the decision will fall upon the shoulders of our future president; whether Donald Trump will continue the political status quo of deep engagement or follow through on his “Make America Great Again” campaign remains to be seen, and could depend on the influence of various actors pursuing their domestic and global interests.…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the U.S. dropped nuclear bombs on Japan the Soviet Union felt that they need to create their own nuclear weapon to ensure that the U.S. would not use one on them. Then in 1949 the Soviet Union set off their first nuclear weapon. The Soviet Union’s nuclear bomb test scared America because now the U.S. was not the only one with a nuclear weapon and now it felt threatened. As a result of the Soviet’s test the U.S. started to produce more nuclear weapons under the idea of deterrence. “The stockpile of both the United States and the Soviet Union increased in a nuclear arms race as each sought to develop a deterrent to the other, involving a second-strike capability” (Carlisle).…

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Abhorrent but Necessary On August 6, 1945, the city of Hiroshima, Japan went up in smoke when “Little Boy,” an atomic bomb developed in the secretive Manhattan Project, was dropped. Three days later, the atomic bomb dubbed “Fat Man” obliterated another Japanese city, Nagasaki. The bombing itself and its effect on survivors’ health was devastating, and President Truman’s decision to drop the bombs remains highly controversial 71 years later. In fact, Naji Dahi, Ph.D., insists that the bombings were unnecessary, unjustified, and ineffective.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One thing this paper discusses is how war between states with nuclear weapons is discouraged because of the weapons. Atomic bombs are extremely difficult to manage and always have imperfections because they are manmade and humans are the ones controlling them so there is always a chance that something will go wrong. Since the United States was the first state to develop nuclear weapons they have it perfected the most, many other states have weapon designs that are much less safe. Not only are the weapons that other countries have less safe but the leadership that many other countries have is not at the same caliber as the United States which could lead to disaster. Iran was one of the countries to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and if they were to get an atomic bomb they would violate that treaty and invite other countries to violate that…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Book Review Author: Robert J. McMahon Title: The Cold War: A Very Short Introduction Publisher: Oxford University Press Place and Date of Publication: New York, 2003 Topic and Scope: In The Cold War: A Very Short Introduction, Robert J. McMahon discusses a general account of the Cold War, spanning the period from 1945 to the finale of the Soviet-American confrontation in 1990. McMahon discusses key events, trends, and themes that that highlighted key players, such as Stalin, de Gaulle, and Reagan. He also devotes much attention to the Cold War 's domestic as well as international effects.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This boils down from the belief that with the possession of these weapons, they can easily avert an attack against them. The Cold War heavily demonstrates this kind of nuclear deterrence technique. In one case, the United States of America (US) and Russia, both involved in the Cold War, were having a nuclear arms race as an attempt to maintain parity with each other’s stockpiles. No country was stronger than the other that would be able to take the other down (The Eleanor Roosevelt Papers Project, n.d.). Both recognized that if one makes a wrong move against another, annihilation would most probably occur.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is said that the better a country can defend itself from enemies, and then most likely the country wouldn’t undergo any harm. Another advantage you get from nuclear weapons is power. Countries that use nuclear weapons have more power and are harder to defeat in war. It is suggested that if a country has the least amount of nuclear weapons, other countries would be afraid to attack. With the help from nuclear weapons, small countries can beat larger…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roughly seventy years ago marked the explosion of the nuclear bombs dropped over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The merciless bombs were dropped on August 6, 1945, by an American officer in the U.S Air Force by the name of Charles W. Sweeney, on a Booing B-29 Superfortress bomber plane during the final stages of World War II (1939-1945). The mid nineteen forty 's was without a doubt a staggering time for the Japanese nation; this was a period loaded with resentment and anger as they glimpsed a massive nuclear bomb headed straight to them as a B-29 bomber fled the scene after destroying almost their entire city. According to an online historical article provided by the history channel titled “Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki”, the impact wiped out nearly 90 percent of the city and killed over 80,000 people instantly before the bomb had even hit the ground; a few thousand later then died because of the immense amount of radiation after affect the bomb…

    • 1322 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays