Why The Average Man Does Not Want To Be Free

Improved Essays
H.L Mencken (1880 - 1956), an American essayist and social critic once wrote, “The average man does not want to be free. He simply wants to be safe.” In other words, Mencken claimed that humans prioritize safety over freedom. That means a man will gladly give up anything, including his rights and liberties, to acquire the protection he desires. This quote contradicts with the belief that America had been built upon. Here in the United States, people voluntarily accept consequences in return for freedom. This can clearly be seen through the citizen’s reaction to the recent laws passed by Congress.
In 2008, Congress passed a law called The FISA Amendment Act which allowed the government to track any international electronic communication between the people without a warrant. Congress claimed that this law would safeguard people from future terrorist attacks. Instead of accepting The FISA Amendment Act, many people protested against it. They believed the government possessed no rights to interfere with citizens’ private lives and especially with the lives of people who live in foreign countries. The government should never use
…show more content…
The number of protesters increases daily throughout the United States as people continue to fight for the abolition of unjust laws passed by Congress. Currently, there are more people who are combating for additional privileges from the government compared to people who are demanding extra protection. A recent poll by Pew Research in 2014 showed that 74% of Americans declared they should not abandon their freedom and privacy for the sake of safety. This poll proves how people consider liberty far more important than security. They agree to put their lives at a greater risk in return for an increase of personal

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment states that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Friedman and Kerr). However, the USA PATRIOT Act amends several parts of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) and Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (Title III) in such a manner that violates the civil liberties granted by the Fourth Amendment (Rackow 1657). FISA, specifically Section 702, permits United States intelligence officials to examine the “communications of foreigners outside the U.S. without a warrant” (Schallhorn), while Title III “established that governmental interception of an individual’s telephone conversation, conducted without the target’s consent, constitutes a search and seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment (Rackow 1658). Specifically, Section 218 of the USA PATRIOT Act alters FISA § 1804(a)(7)(B) such that a federal officer is no longer required to show that the sole purpose of surveillance is to achieve information of foreign intelligence, but…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In H.L. Mencken’s writing, he explains how “the average man does not want to be free, but wants to be safe.” BUt freedom is not only more important, but necessary for safety of the individual and the society. THroughout history there are many example of societies and even nations that attempted the idea of “public safety” over individual freedom. In ideology, it sounds as if it would work, but if you take the deffinition of that idea, it is communism, which has shown to fail. The biggest example of this is the SOviet Union.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some of the scandals that have shown that executive powers in the fight against terrorism can be abused include secret prisons abroad, communication interception and detainee abuse. Public mistrust that the fight against terrorism may be costing their civil liberties is justifiable when the government eavesdrops on their private conversations. The fourth amendment of the constitution clearly stipulates explicitly that persons have the right to be secure in their persons, papers and effects, and their rights against unreasonable searches and seizures must not be violated. Any official surveillance of international calls or emails of Americans within the U.S required an approval from FISC (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court), but there have been reports of government eavesdropping despite the presence of legal…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the founding of the United States to the present, the idea of freedom has been the staple of America’s appeal. The roots of freedom were planted in the Declaration of Independence, where Thomas Jefferson defined freedom as “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” The statement held an attractive promise, as it seemingly applied to all Americans. In reality, the promising statement was intended solely for white men, and these restricting ideals were rooted deep into the soil of the rapidly growing America. It is clear that modern American freedom does not equate to that of the Founding, but the degree to which it…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The terrorist threat to our country will not expire. You saw different perspectives related to restricting civil liberties in times of war or threat. What other events could lead to greater restrictions of civil liberties? What types of restrictions are valuable to the public good in these situations? Consider the issue in relation to a threat that is not man-made, such as a natural…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being A Patriot Act Essay

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. The U.S.A. Patriot Act is an antiterrorism policy set forth immediately following the attacks of 9/11, in which various federal agencies are given increased power in determining the reach of domestic surveillance, interagency data sharing, law enforcement, immigration, individual privacy, civil liberties, and overall authority. The consequences of such an extensive act include endangerment of privacy, discouragement of free speech, potential abuses of civil liberties, an imbalanced and unchecked government authority, and increases in discrimination and profiling against Muslims, Arabs, and people who appear related to those two previous labels. Guantanamo Bay is an off shore military prison that holds people whom the U.S. consider to be suspected terrorists. Technically prisoners of the Bay are supposed to be guaranteed “humane treatment, free exercise of religion and medical treatment”(Civil Liberties).…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Spying In 1984

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Any government has absolutely no right to spy on their own citizens. Whether is the United States, or the totalitarian government of 1984, Spying on innocent citizens should not be permitted. the act of spying is limited by law, threatens democracy, and illegally obtained evidence can be used to incriminate someone unfairly. It has been 230 years since the United States constitution was signed, yet the government still follows the law of the land.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American essayist and social critic H.L Mencken wrote, “The average man does not want to be free. He simply wants to be safe. This means that people are innately born wanting to be safe and that freedom is not a concern as long as they are safe. However I disagree with H.l Mencken. Not all believe that they should give up their freedom just so they can be safe.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) epitomizes contemporary conflict in our judicial system. Background of Social Conflict FISC was originally established by Congress as a special court in 1978, and then revolutionized in 2001, however, it only recently became relevant to the general public after “whistleblowing” Edward Snowden exposed the seemingly underground system to American Society in 2015. Even then it, arguably, has not yet received the recognition it well deserves. The provisions of FISC were established through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1783. FISA “ required the government, before it commenced certain kinds of intelligence gathering operations within…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    11, there has been a steady assault on many fundamental liberties in the name of fighting terrorism but in ways that have nothing at all to do with catching terrorists.” (Jost, 2003, p.894). According to the study which has been named the “Civil Liberties Survey” over half of people preferred to protect their civil liberties instead of trading them off for a more secure nation. On the other hand, over half of those same people said that they were okay with allowing the government to require national ID cards in order to offer security. This shows that people want a safe nation, but they also want their constitutional guaranteed rights (Davis, Silver,…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Patriot Act

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Federal prosecutors insisted that they used the “terrorist” label only to insure that the accused would receive tough sentences. But if that was the only concern, there would have been no need to apply the Patriot Act retroactively,” (Olson). The only question is whether or not the American people believe that the act is necessary or not. The question is formed by the people and that is ‘Freedom or Authority?” This idea is crucial because the U.S. government has two jobs; To preserve the freedom of the American people, and to protect the American people in order to preserve the freedom of them.…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New technologies are putting more pressure on the boundaries of privacy. New ways are emerging that aid in tracking private information on individuals. No matter what new technology emerges, individual privacy rights should be respected at all levels. Americans are concerned of how to maintain an equilibrium between their personal privacy rights and the need for government to track potential terrorist threats since Edward Snowden leaked National Security Agency's (NSA) documents which included collections of information regarding data from cellphone and internet of millions of Americans. Freedom, privacy and safety are the rights of Americans and should not be compromised to confirm safety from terrorism.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Patriot Act

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Patriot Act was passed after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. This act allows the government and or federal officials to track and intercept our communications with one another. It also makes new crimes, punishments, and new procedures that we use for terrorists. The history of the Patriot Act, the abuse of our civil liberties, and the current issues with the act lead Americans to feel like they cannot trust their government.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Wiretapping Is Bad

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Safety from external danger is the most powerful director of national conduct. Even the ardent love of liberty will, after a time, give way to its dictates… To be more safe, they at length become willing to run the risk of being less free.” was once said by Alexander Hamilton. Being safe from threats is what wiretapping will bring to innocent people, even if that does mean having the slight chance of losing privacy and freedom.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Freedom Vs Security

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    First of all “freedom” and “security” are both vague concepts that are both equally important and therefore there is a trade off between them. They are both interconnected and neglecting one in the pursuit of the other can cause a problem in that society. This essay aims to highlight both the advantages and disadvantages of freedom and security at an individual and societal level. It will also incorporate use of significant examples in different countries relating to these concepts focusing on the Uk and America. Finally it will introduce the concepts of Liberalism and totalitarianism and how they apply to freedom and security.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays