What Is The Death Penalty Morally Wrong

Improved Essays
The death penalty has always been a very controversial and hotly debated topic. Killing someone is a very heinous act that cannot be tolerated, especially when premeditated and committed in the first degree. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but it is conspicuous that capital punishment is the only way to cope with these terrible acts. Capital punishment is additionally a way to reduce the amount of murders committed in the first degree. Premeditated murder cases are also very infrequent. In result, the death penalty would only be used in extreme cases with top-notch lawyers to defend the convicted felon. Many people on the opposing side of this argument propose that the death penalty is morally wrong, but the crime that is committed is worse for a myriad of reasons. On April 15, 2013 two bombs went off near the finish line of the Boston marathon, killing three and injuring hundreds. The culprit was a man named Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. Two years later he was sentenced to death. This was the only suitable punishment for his egregious actions. This man intentionally killed 3 people and intended to kill more. Any other penalization would not serve this felon right. No one should be able to put themselves above the law and get away with life without parole. The governor of Texas, Rick Perry is pro capital punishment and has previously stated “The state of Texas has a very thoughtful, a very clear process in place of which — when someone commits the most heinous of crimes against our citizens, they get a fair hearing, they go through an appellate process, they go up to the Supreme Court of the United States, if that’s required. But in the state of Texas, if you come into our state and you kill one of our children, you kill a police officer, you’re involved with another crime and you kill one of our citizens, you will face the ultimate justice in the state of Texas, and that is, you will be executed.” (Rizzo, Kevin) In short, Governor Perry's quote means that depending on the extent of your crime you will be punished accordingly. Generally speaking, premeditated murder cases are very infrequent and the death penalty would only be used in extreme cases, such as first degree murder. The number of executions from 1976 to present day is 1,392. Considering our population is 321.42 million people that is nowhere near a large amount. (Harden, Seth.) Many government officials and states lean towards the death penalty because crimes as terrible as these do not happen every day. They believe that since capital punishment will only be used against the most sinister of criminals it should be allowed. Since first degree murders and other crimes that result in capital punishment aren't common, tax payers would only have to spend the money to execute people on rare occasions. Capital punishment is not only infrequent, …show more content…
The death penalty is more effective than long term jail time or life in prison. The idea of being put to death is much scarier than the idea of being put in a cell. Gordon Tullock was a well-respected knowledgeable man who once stated, “Think of a criminal pointing a gun at a potential victim with the policeman standing behind the criminal. The policeman says, “You can shoot him, but if you do then I’ll shoot you.” In this circumstance, the threat of death certainly would deter most or all potential murderers. We than can think of actual system as reducing the probability and speed of execution. With each reduction, the level of deterrence also is reduced because fewer potential murderers will be deterred as the probability and speed of execution is reduced.” (50 pro) More than half of our country has the death penalty and stands behind Tullocks theory. New Hampshire is one of the many states that believes in the death penalty. In 2015 statics proved that the murder rate was 1.1%. Maryland is about the same size and recently abolished the death penalty. In 2015 statistics were also taken and found that the murder rate was 8.6%. That is a 7.5% difference. When Maryland had the death penalty in 2012 the murder rate was 6.3% that is also a large change considering it is within the same state. (murder rates

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What people (including potential criminals) fear more will have a greater deterrent effect on them. People (including potential criminals) fear death more than they do any other humane punishment. The death penalty is a humane punishment. Therefore, people (including criminals) will be deterred more by the death penalty than by any other humane punishment. The death penalty will save innocent lives.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Whilst some think that the death penalty is a fair sanction, it is an inequitable penance because many convicts on death row suffered from prejudiced trials, were mentally-ill, or were wrongfully accused. There have been hundreds of unjustified deaths from the death penalty. In conclusion, the death sentence is an unnecessary form of punishment that advocates the obliteration of human life. There is no proof whatsoever that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, the severity of the death penalty will make criminals want to avoid it. However, the statistics tell a different story. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the rates of murder, one of the most common violent crimes in the U.S., are higher in states using capital punishment than the ones that aren’t (Deterrence). While the general trend of murder rates has been a downwards one, there’s still a significant percentage difference in the statistics (peak difference was 46% in 2005). This evidence shows that the idea that capital punishment is a deterrent is false.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty In Texas

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty does not act as a deterrent any better than other punishments. If it did, death penalty states would have lower rates of murder than non-death penalty states. This is not the case. The death penalty is hugely expensive.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals are afraid of dying, but not everyone is afraid of prison. The usage of the death penalty decreases the crime rate, provides safety to society, and provides closure to the families involved. The first key element to look at is deterrence. The death penalty defers individuals from committing acts of violence that are punishable by death.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty does not deter crime. It is viewed as inhumane and barbaric. Some argue that all human life is sacred. Some argue that the death penalty goes against every organized…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is viewed as a heavy subject with many moral issues tide to it but in reality the death penalty is one of the easiest law out there even with the shackles of moral impute. In the end the punishment should fit the crime no matter the moral ideology. People should not be arguing that the death penalty is below the society that has been created through brutal acts. The death penalty in all forms is made for the protection of others.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    David Mullhausen, an expert on criminal justice programs in The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis, wrote this article to inform the country about the effectiveness the death penalty has in deterring murder. Using investigations performed by Duke University and other institutions, including his own research, Muhlhausen determined that Capital Punishment effectively deters murder, ultimately saving lives. This source is important to the over-all thesis of my paper. The article uses credible research of states that adopt laws allowing death penalties and murder rates.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is not effective in reducing the crime rate, which initially was one of its goals. Thus, if viewing this issue from a rational choice theory perspective, it is absolutely not necessary to use something that is not effective in the fight against crime…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    General deterrence is the idea that convincing potential criminals that the costs associated with criminal activity far outweigh the benefits will control crime. If this is the case a deterrent such as the death penalty in America should discourage individuals from committing crime. The effectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent has been investigated by a number of criminologists. Logan & Sellin (1981) initially found no such deterrent effect. Most studies, even those done in recent times have used time series data that are missing the post moratorium evidence.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Obviously the best way to prove killing is wrong is with more killing, right? Of course not, it's this level of hypocrisy that attempts to justify murder regardless of the context. The death penalty is barbaric and the fact that it's still in use today is utterly surprising. There are numerous reasons as to why it's wrong, it has no effect on crime rates, it's hypocritical, and there's a chance that innocent people can be wrongly executed. Numerous studies have been conducted on whether the death penalty has an effect on crime rates.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty: Politically Correct or Morally Wrong? If you ask 10 different countries if the death penalty should be banned as a form of punishment, in a nutshell the chances are you will get an equal split vote. There is a lot of scrutiny surrounding the local and national government’s choice of using capital punishment, known commonly as the death penalty, as a way of convicting criminals who have committed the most heinous and horrendous crimes in the country. Those crimes usually consist of murder cases and other serious crimes such as rape and/or terrorism.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Dark Ages, criminals were sentenced to death. Did I say Dark Ages? I meant during the current technology age. I believe that capital punishment is wrong for many reasons. Before I divulge in those reasons, though, it is important to acknowledge why this debate is not that simple.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a judge yelled “Guilty, for a crime you didn’t commit!.” , that would be extremely shocking right? Killing anyone for any reason is terrible by all means, especially if the person being killed is possibly innocent. The death penalty should be illegal because it is morally wrong, someone could be falsely accused, and killing someone should be considered "cruel" under the Constitution.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Today, most if not all societies rebuke the killing of another person, however, many of these same places condone the death penalty for those criminals who have committed horrendous acts. Although it seems to be universally true that murder is wrong, there are societies that view the death penalty as being an acceptable form of murder. The question then arises whether killing in certain cases can be justified. Those in favor of the death penalty commonly turn to anger as being a justifiable reason to the death penalty while those opposed to capital punishment hold strong to the belief that killing, no matter who is doing it or why is always wrong. Murder, in all cases, is morally wrong because it robs the victim of their human dignity which is universally viewed as being a right for…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics