Unjust Law

Improved Essays
Offering sanctuary to women and children seeking protection from despatch to Nauru would break the law. That is a fact. The important question is whether it would be right to break the law. In healthy democracies this question is frequently raised. Bearded protestor at #LetThemStay rally in BrisbaneIn any society it is common for people to break the law and disobey lawful instructions. People fail to move on when instructed by police, evade tax, drive too fast, keep silent about abuse in churches, speak out about abuse in detention centres, trespass on military facilities, and drive when drunk. All break the law and, if caught, face sanction. Many people assert that it is never right to break a law duly enacted by the government. From this principle it follows that anyone offering sanctuary to people who seek protection in Australia is acting wrongly. This blanket condemnation of law breaking, however, runs against our inherited moral tradition. We honour many people who disobeyed the laws of their country. They may include Christian martyrs who disobeyed Roman law compelling them to worship the Emperor, Hans and Sophie Scholl who distributed anti-war leaflets in Nazi Germany, and the many in occupied Holland who harboured Jewish families. These people appealed to a higher law that trumped laws enacted by their rulers. Because the laws were unjust they believed it was right to break them. And we salute them. The argument for disobedience to unjust laws was made even more strongly at the Nuremberg trials following the Second World War. Nazi officials were condemned for crimes against humanity, despite pleading that they were obeying the law and lawful instructions. The tribunal decisions declared disobedience to Nazi laws not only legitimate but obligatory. The implicit conclusion to be drawn from these examples is that we must obey just laws, but that we may, and sometimes must, disobey unjust laws. To say that a law is duly enacted is not enough to command our obedience. The law must also be just. So when considering the case of offering sanctuary to people who seek protection we must ask first whether the law prohibiting …show more content…
From this it follows that laws passed to criminalise harbouring people who seek protection are also unjust, and may legitimately be broken for sufficiently serious reasons. These may include the urgency of the need to rescue people from the harm inflicted on them by unjust laws, or to proclaim publicly the injustice of the policy. The main argument against breaking even an unjust law is that it will bring the law into disrepute. It certainly commits those who break unjust laws to respect law. But respect for law means more than obeying laws. It means respecting the rule of law in society, which is built on the understanding that all people stand equally under the protection of the law. The law and its administration must serve the common good and not sectional interests. The responsibility for upholding the rule of law lies both with individual citizens and with governments. Above all, the laws that governments pass must be just. Unjust laws, above all, bring law into disrepute and foster law breaking. To respect the rule of law while law breaking is a delicate matter. It involves being fastidious in focusing action on the law that is unjust, and not acting indiscriminately outside the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The book Ordinary Injustice How America Holds Court is a novel written by attorney and journalist Amy Bach about the American legal system, and how it was become flawed. In four chapters, she discusses many different cases where injustice and corruption has occurred in the United States legal system all over the country. I chose to focus on a chapter titled “A Troy Champion” which is the second chapter in the novel written about a beloved city council president, and former judge, named Henry R. Bauer from the city of Troy who is not as just as everyone has come to believe. Bach begins the chapter by discussing how popular Bauer had become. “To walk the streets with Bauer was to accompany a celebrity” (Bach, 77) she says.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You can break the law in many ways, even when you do not recognize that you are doing it. Frank Trippett, in his passage “A Red Light for Scofflaws” claims that Americans believe that law-and-order is threatened by things such as violent and major crimes, he believes that the foundations of social order is shaken when citizens do not take the law seriously. Trippet supports his argument by first describing the actions that citizens take to not pay enough attention to the law. He gives evidence of the crimes that people commit in order to make people aware of how easily the law is broken, and how it does not register in their minds. The author creates a serious, factual tone and presents it to the people that do not recognize the things that they do to break the law.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tv Host: Good Afternoon this is Laura from... We have all heard that the Nauruan government intends to process the refugee claims of 600 asylum seekers within a week. Furthermore, the Australian Government Policy is trying to stop the boat people from entering into Australia by sending asylum seekers to places like Nauru. This is a current issue that has been generating a lot of debates amongst Australians. Today we will be talking to Anika Tukara an Asylum seeker advocate who works with Asylum seeker resource centre. Please give a round of applause and welcome Anika Tukara *Applause* Tv host: hi how are you Anika?…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Midterm 1. Decide as an appellate judge based on the law that you have learned whether the police had a legitimate exigency based on the 4th Amendment and whether the trial judge should have suppressed the marijuana cigarette as evidence. In King v. State the trial judge should NOT suppressed the marijuana blunt as evidence. In this situation the police had "probable cause," meaning there was reasonable basis for the officers to believe that a crime may have been committed when they heard "Some movement inside the apartment.”…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Poor Procedural Justice

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tom Tyler has led the way in researching procedural justice of counter terrorism among Muslims Tyler et al.(2010). There seems to be research lacking with procedural justice and police legitimacy for regular law enforcement among Arab-Americans. It may or may not be the same predictors that support cooperation of Arab-Americans to cooperate with traditional crime fighting and counter terrorism. Many immigrants from Arab countries like Lebanese in Australia are Muslim(Cherny and Murphy, 2013). The media have focused on relating Arab speaking people, especially Lebanese and Sudanese to Islamic terrorist groups (Al, 2007).…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fair Sentencing Case Study

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States NY Federal drug sentencing guidelines compel disproportionately harsh sentences with a primary focus on racial disparity among poor communities. Drug crimes account for 51% of the offenses in federal prison and of the 195,933 federal inmates 69.7% of those individuals are African Americans and Hispanics. That is nearly three quarters of the total prison population. This exhibits the racial disparity within the prison system. Studies from Rehavi of the University of British Columbia and professor at The University of Michigan explains that the racial gap and discrimination of African Americans to White Americans are due to mandatory minimum filings by the prosecutor; black males are twice as likely to be affected by these…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the history of the United States, from the time period of 1857 until 1896, the Supreme Court, a national branch of government designed to interpret the Constitution to decide what is and what isn't constitutional, denied civil rights to Blacks to a great extent. With this denial of civil liberties, life for Blacks became filled with injustice in society, unequal treatment, and poor living conditions. Throughout our history, Blacks have been treated unjustly, and from 1857-1896, the Supreme Court had the power to correct these errors; however, they instead contributed to them. A tremendous amount of cases of indicating civil injustice towards Blacks had been brought up before the Supreme Court. However, two significant cases that made a tremendous…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Procedural Justice

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Many studies have been done on legitimacy surveys asking questions about confidence and trust of the police and the public's willingness to follow the police orders. Tyler and Muo(2002) conducted a study to access these types of questions to learn people's sense of accepting police decisions. they found that people who viewed the police as legitimate were more likely to accept their orders. When police act fairly and used procedural justice they were more accepting of the police actions.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of these being ‘all these boats’ the truth is that in 2008 to 2009 Australia allowed a total of 2,497 onshore protection and humanitarian visas, which is fewer than half arriving by boat. There is no such thing as boats arriving and threatening the borders, and there never has been. Another myth being ‘they’re a security threat’ each and every one of the ‘illegal’ refugees who come to Australia are required to undergo a rigorous Australian Government security check, as a result of this the only reason being is because they are fleeing from persecution and any threats in their country (A Just Australia). All asylum seekers and refugees undergo security checks to ensure that no one who is trying to enter the country is at risk of any crime to the rest of the community. The phrase ‘illegal refugee’ is extremely misleading, as the (Asylum Seeker Resource Centre) quotes that ‘great care must be taken to avoid describing people who arrived on boat without visa in terms that are likely to be inaccurate or unfair, by using the terms such as ‘illegal’ or ‘illegal immigrants.’…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Injustice Vs Incarceration

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In most cases of injustice, individuals that do not directly experience unjust acts can generally overlook the fact that the acts occur at all. However, listening to our peers and treating the downtrodden with the same respect we give ourselves can change ignorance into progressive change. Some of the grave injustices of the late twenty first century can be seen when free individuals listen to their currently or previously incarcerated peers. The majority of policies and practices affecting incarcerated people, such as shackling, poor medical attention, and extreme sentencing, successfully serve to restrict bodily rights, despite the existence of a few policies that strive to expand said rights, like fair chance hiring and Farmer Vs. Brennan…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rachel Pipitone March 18, 2016 Topic #2 Our court system is suppose to be both fair and impartial, a patron of equal justice in American constitutional democracy. A full jury is provided during court and both sides of a case are always heard, in order to keep the court from being unfair.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The prompt for King’s letter goal is to compare and contrast Letter from a Birmingham Jail and Handbook of Epictetus. One section of King’s letter dealt with the issue of just and unjust laws and how direct action would effect the outcome. King and Epictetus had two different ways of dealing with unjust laws and the effect of them on an individual person. Their thoughts are similar but not similar enough that one could come to the conclusion that they would both agree. Even though they would not be able to agree, both of their solutions can be used together to form a peaceful solution.…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As a consequence, we have a duty to obey the law but it can be overridden when we have a more pressing moral obligation . Furthermore, to reinforce my point of view I will rely on what Finnis advocated concerning that matter. He was also conscious that saying an unjust law is not a law is a contradiction, when he talked about the peripheral sense of law. Indeed, he explained that law has two senses. On the one hand, law has a focal meaning, “it describes rules which secure the common good by co-ordinating the different goods of individuals” .…

    • 2196 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Judicial Review

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The aim of rule of law is to ensure that public officials and authorities exercise the powers conferred on them in accordance with the law, without exceeding the constitutional limits of such powers put in place by Parliament. Two of the most central means by which the rule of law is enforced are through judicial review and human rights law. Both act as agents of the rule of law by controlling the power of the state and protecting the rights and freedoms of its citizens. Over the course of this I essay I will first establish the procedures and principles of judicial review. I will then argue that the current procedures and principles in place are not entirely effective or sufficient for the benefit of the individual and therefore in need of being reformed.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    As political philosopher Montesquieu puts it “the spirit of the law is justice. The letter must be broken at some points to achieve it.” Justice is defined in the dictionary as being consistent with what is morally right. Unfortunately, what is considered as legal is not always consistent with what is morally right. For sure, a huge amount of laws are made to ensure that people have their fundamental human rights, safety, equality and freedom.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics