Chamberlin, on the other hand thought he could reach world peace by offering The Munich Agreement which let Hitler to take control of Sudetenland but he had to promise to stop taking over any other land after that. First, this just showed Hitler that he had what he wanted, power, because people gave him what he wanted in fear of what might happen if they didn’t. Making a promise with Hitler was absolutely pointless because he even said it himself, “make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it and eventually they will believe it”, he had no problem with lying. Churchill strongly disagreed with Chamberlin’s decision to appease Hitler and described it by saying, “an appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last” which is exactly what Great Britain was trying to do at the time. Chamberlin’s appeasement was exactly what Hitler wanted, fear from other nations to show how powerful he was, and it even gave Germany more land. Today appeasement won’t work any better than it did before WWII because you can’t bargain with people like Hitler or ISIS, in today’s world. The enemy will always win because appeasement means you want peace but the enemy doesn’t so you will have to make an agreement where you give more than you get. Groups or people like ISIS don’t need your approval to invade countries and kill innocent people in the process so an in order to convince them to stop you would need to give them what they want so there really is no point because the enemy comes out on top. Appeasement isn’t a good
Chamberlin, on the other hand thought he could reach world peace by offering The Munich Agreement which let Hitler to take control of Sudetenland but he had to promise to stop taking over any other land after that. First, this just showed Hitler that he had what he wanted, power, because people gave him what he wanted in fear of what might happen if they didn’t. Making a promise with Hitler was absolutely pointless because he even said it himself, “make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it and eventually they will believe it”, he had no problem with lying. Churchill strongly disagreed with Chamberlin’s decision to appease Hitler and described it by saying, “an appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last” which is exactly what Great Britain was trying to do at the time. Chamberlin’s appeasement was exactly what Hitler wanted, fear from other nations to show how powerful he was, and it even gave Germany more land. Today appeasement won’t work any better than it did before WWII because you can’t bargain with people like Hitler or ISIS, in today’s world. The enemy will always win because appeasement means you want peace but the enemy doesn’t so you will have to make an agreement where you give more than you get. Groups or people like ISIS don’t need your approval to invade countries and kill innocent people in the process so an in order to convince them to stop you would need to give them what they want so there really is no point because the enemy comes out on top. Appeasement isn’t a good