Holbach's Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
The True Puppeteer What is free will? Is it a false belief or an idea of human actions? Paul Halbach believes that human beings do not have ‘free will’, because he is a determinist. A determinist believes that all human choices, events, actions, and reactions are all already determined. Holbach argues that ,us, human beings as physical objects, that only obey the un-mutable laws of nature, and that the environment we live in, influences our cognitive thinking that fuels our actions, the way we perceive things, that in turn drives our motives, beliefs, desires, and our will to act. He would also argue that having choices does not prove freedom, and the absence of restraint is not absence of necessity, and that it we build up an illusion of …show more content…
In his article, he made an example where person B threw himself out of a window, to prove a point to person A (determinist), that we have freedom of choice. But ironically, person B’s action proved person A’s, and Holbach’s argument to be correct: That our desires, beliefs, controls our sense of will to act. Person B was controlled by his motivation, his desire, his belief, to prove that we do have freedom. Holbach 's states in relation to our desires controlling our will, “whether this obstacle or motive be with his own machine or exterior of his person: he is not master of the thought presented to his mind, which determines his will; this thought is excited by some cause independent of himself” (441). Meaning that we do not control our will, it is our motives, beliefs that works the human body machine and forces it to move, not the other way around. Holbach believes that humans are not a free agent. Because we do not create our own desires, or motivations, (etc.), we are only influenced by the environment such as external objects that stimulates our perception. Which relates back to person B responds to its external object, person A’s views, which made him jump out of a window because he wanted to prove that we do have free

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Holbach’s View on Free Will Paul Holbach was a French philosopher who is a hard determinist meaning that he believes determinism is true, and if determinism is true then you cannot have free will, therefore free will does not exist. In Paul Holbach 's “The Illusion of Free Will,” he argues that people don’t have any free will and that nature determines every human’s actions and will. Free will is the ability for one to perform an action without any outside force influencing them and to be able to be morally responsible for that action. Determinism is the belief where people’s actions and wills are caused by an external force rather their own will meaning no one can be held morally responsible for the outcome for that action. The dilemma of…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human behaviors, actions, desires and memories are all subjects that are discussed in everyday philosophy. Philosophy is defined as the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence. Philosophy has a lot to do with the future. When it comes to philosophy the future is already set and no one knows what will happen until the time comes and that is called hard determinism. Hard determinism is a theory that human behavior and actions are determined by external factors, and therefore humans do not have genuine free will or ethical accountability.…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Hobbes, man’s life in the state of nature was one of fear and selfishness. He believes man natural liberty must be limited because, “all mankind [has] a perpetuall and restlesse desire of Power after power, that ceaseth onely in Death”. Under Hobbes philosophies, a social contract focuses man to surrender all their rights and freedoms to an authority. This authority will then protect the lives and properties of the people. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen establishes Hobbes often discussed “natural rights of man [which] are the sole causes of the miseries of the world”.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stace's Compatibilism

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    His application where he points out that if someone were to be predicted to lie based on previous causes leading up to a moment, and they did actually lie, they are still freely making that decision to lie because it is based on their personal desires which if they were different would alter the choice. This rationale to separate the idea of freedom of choice by pointing out the difference between power to make a decision and to recognize a decision is powerful and does serve to strengthen his position. He points out that free will and predictability are compatible with an example of expecting an honourable man to act honourably and how common sense would still dictate the man is choosing to act with honour. The idea of a separation between types of freedoms of choice is a recurring theme in the three schools of thought all of which generally accept the kind of freedom which Stace refers to as free will but is generally called the freedom of “self-realisation” or the knowledge of an ability to make a choice. The other kind of freedom is what philosophers would call free will traditionally and is the power to actually carry out either choice in a situation regardless of circumstance.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Paul Holbach, his full name Paul Henri Thiry, Baron d’Holbach, was a French author, philosopher, encyclopedist, and atheist who lived from 1723 to 1789 and a famous figure from the French enlightenment. In Holbach's most famous book called System of Nature, he lays out his views on the topic of free will and determinism in a section titled “The Illusion of Free Will”. In it Holbach writes, “[Man] is connected to universal nature, and submitted to the necessary and immutable laws that she imposes on all beings she contains…” (Holbach 438). Holbach essentially claims that all physical objects act according to the necessary and immutable laws of nature. Those “necessary and immutable laws of nature” he mentions are are the natural laws which are impossible to break or change, such as gravity and so forth.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Of the System of Man’s Free Agency” D’Holbach explains his argument that human action is determined by the laws of nature. He proposes that humans are part of the natural world and therefore governed by necessary laws, so they have no free will. On this essay I will argue that D’Holbach’s argument on motive is not a good one; I will explain the argument, present why do I think the argument fails and consider ways to defend the argument from my own attack. D’Holbach’s Argument D’Holbach concedes that “To be undeceived on the system of his free agency, man has simply to recur to the motive by which his will is determined; he will always find this motive is out of his own control. It is said: that in consequence of an idea to which the mind gives birth, man acts freely if he encounters no obstacle”.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is essentially saying that man’s will is nothing more than an action that incites change within the brain that causes it to desire an outcome that is subsequently achieved through actions in the body. For example, a lack of food causes hunger: a change in the brain. Hunger causes man to desire food and subsequently eat: a desire for action, and an action followed through. Holbach also adds that there are, in fact, situations where the brain’s desire can be overridden, and “he does not act according to this impulse” that he previously experienced (439). The reason, Holbach explains, is simple: “it is because there comes some new cause, some new motive, some new idea, which modifies his brain in a different matter, gives him a new impulse, determines his will in another way, by which the action of the former impulse is suspended,” (439).…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter nine in Problems from Philosophy by James Rachels and Stuart Rachels titled “The Debate Over Free Will” is about the three arguments over free will. They are Determinism, Libertarianism, and Compatibilism. The Determinism argument is, as Rachels states, that our actions are manipulated by forces we cannot control. The second argument Rachels presents is Libertarianism which states that some actions we freely choose and that we are also not made to do so. The last argument is Compatibilism and according to Rachels, it states that actions are both free and determined.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another article I found for about free will come from Psychology today. Psychologist Seth Schwartz talks about weather or not we have free will, one of the first points he states is that “ Our choices feel free, don’t they? (Seth Schwartz). He states facts on what psychologists like Freud and Skinner thought about free will. Freud talked about unconscious conflict as causes of behavior and skinner talked about environmental contingencies, but either way we look it at what they thought on…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The state of nature ties to his view regarding one’s vulnerability to be subject to harmful actions. One cannot fulfill the security of the first rule without a second derivative law. He writes, “…there can be no security to any man, how strong or wise soever he be…” (560 Landau). Given the nature of men, Hobbes argues that, any one man can’t live in peace in a state of nature (what is sometimes eluded to when he discusses relevant members being at war). An individual may maintain an advantage over another.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article “Evil and Omnipotence,” J.L. Mackie explores the various adequate and fallacious solutions to the “problem of evil,” a problem in which “God is omnipotent; God is wholly good; and yet evil exists” (p. 119). While Mackie discusses, analyzes, and criticizes many solutions, including “good cannot exist without evil” (p. 120) and “evil is necessary as a means to good” (p. 122), my paper will solely focus on Mackie’s response to the fallacious solution that “evil is due to human free will” (p. 123), which begins “first I must query” on p. 124. This paper will formally extract, justify, critically evaluate, and engage with Mackie’s argument that existence of evil due to free will is erroneous. Mackie describes the free will…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sometimes, a lot of people want the same exact thing. Unfortunately, we can’t all have the same thing. So, according to Hobbes, appetite, scarcity, and power are key features of the state of nature. He views the state of nature as full of violence and fear, but also full of people only looking out for…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life in the State of Nature was describes by Hobbes as being ‘solitary’, ‘poor’, ‘nasty’, ‘brutish’, and ‘short’. Hobbes also believed humans have a natural desire for security and order. And in order to secure self-protection and to avoid misery and pain, societies began entering into contracts. These ideas of self-defense are inherent to human nature and in order to achieve this people would voluntarily surrender their rights and freedoms to a Leviathan via contract who would command obedience. This led…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosopher John Locke discusses this in his book An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. He states that the ability to suspend the fulfillment of one’s desires shows that we are have free will. As we would have desires, for example, maybe we are angry at the person who just cut us off on the highway and have a desire to ram our car into theirs. The fact that we have the ability to suppress our desire and not ram the other persons car shows that we have free will, and we freely choose do the opposite, as we don’t want to endure the punishment that we would receive from our morally responsible society.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There has been many different theories about the topic of Free will. For instance, does free will even truly exist, is it defined by our own religious beliefs or is it simply brought on by cause and effect. Free will is nothing more than our own personal freedom to make choices in our lives. It can be brought on by an urge or naturally carefree feeling, to be able to choose with out the interference or opinions of others. A free course of action driven by our own means of self gratification for the betterment of oneself.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics