The Stanford Prison Experiment was a research developed by Philip zimbardo. The experimental prison was held at Stanford University in a basement where no sunlight Or contact to the outside world was available. This experiment went down in history as one of the most Best-known psychology experiments ever developed. The Psychologist selected 24 college students to undergo the experiment. 12 students were randomly chosen to be prisoners and the other 12 word guards. The 12 that were prisoners were forced to be confined in a makeshift jail cell. The guards were not allowed to physically harm to prisoners what could otherwise create feelings of fear powerlessness and boredom.This social experiment was able to turn levelheaded college students
…show more content…
As time went on eventually the researchers themselves started to lose sight of the true goal of this experiment. Zimbardo Who was a prison warden overlook the abusive behavior the prison guards were having on the students. It took undergraduate at the time Christina Maslach To point out the errors of this experiment and put it to a stop. the Stanford Prison experiment is an example of how Power can play in a situation with human emotions. Because the guards were Given the control and power of the prison, they All of used their authority and acted in ways that they would normally act. The prisoners were placed at a position where they were powerless, Or stool follow what the guards say without their own free will most prisoners became obedient, passive, and depressed. Throughout the experiment I feel the ethical standard varied. I believe that some of the rules to the experiment varied between the students on somewhere not. For instance 24 students were picked out and half word to be separated from prisoners and guards at random. That part I can agree is fair because every student has an understanding of the situation before getting into …show more content…
The experiment also shows that good people can also be affected by authority. In the experiment, the teachers were given the list of questions to relay to the students behind a wall. The teacher is told that whenever the student gets a wrong answer he is supposed to apply electric voltage shocks to the student. Whenever the student gets a wrong answer higher the voltage Watts is increased. As the voltage got increasingly higher the student start to complain about how painful the electric shocks are getting. Most of the teachers were worried for the safety of the students and asked if they should stop the experiment, but was told to keep continuing by the professor. The teachers were also encouraged by the professor 's to keep continuing by informing them that whatever that happens in the experiment would be fault the professor even though the teachers are the ones that are inflicting the pain. Most of the teachers continued at first but as the voltage got higher and higher Got worried for the safety of the student. More than half of them stop at a certain point, but 65% of the teachers continued to the highest voltage. More than half of the school teachers conformed under the rules and regulations of the authority over them. Which shows how much power can make good people do things that they shouldn
As time went on eventually the researchers themselves started to lose sight of the true goal of this experiment. Zimbardo Who was a prison warden overlook the abusive behavior the prison guards were having on the students. It took undergraduate at the time Christina Maslach To point out the errors of this experiment and put it to a stop. the Stanford Prison experiment is an example of how Power can play in a situation with human emotions. Because the guards were Given the control and power of the prison, they All of used their authority and acted in ways that they would normally act. The prisoners were placed at a position where they were powerless, Or stool follow what the guards say without their own free will most prisoners became obedient, passive, and depressed. Throughout the experiment I feel the ethical standard varied. I believe that some of the rules to the experiment varied between the students on somewhere not. For instance 24 students were picked out and half word to be separated from prisoners and guards at random. That part I can agree is fair because every student has an understanding of the situation before getting into …show more content…
The experiment also shows that good people can also be affected by authority. In the experiment, the teachers were given the list of questions to relay to the students behind a wall. The teacher is told that whenever the student gets a wrong answer he is supposed to apply electric voltage shocks to the student. Whenever the student gets a wrong answer higher the voltage Watts is increased. As the voltage got increasingly higher the student start to complain about how painful the electric shocks are getting. Most of the teachers were worried for the safety of the students and asked if they should stop the experiment, but was told to keep continuing by the professor. The teachers were also encouraged by the professor 's to keep continuing by informing them that whatever that happens in the experiment would be fault the professor even though the teachers are the ones that are inflicting the pain. Most of the teachers continued at first but as the voltage got higher and higher Got worried for the safety of the student. More than half of them stop at a certain point, but 65% of the teachers continued to the highest voltage. More than half of the school teachers conformed under the rules and regulations of the authority over them. Which shows how much power can make good people do things that they shouldn