¨A treaty that sets out the rights such a diverse group, including babies, school children, soldiers, parents, and full-time workers, is ambitious to say the least¨ (Davies 51). These are all people that are affected in international adoption, and the treaty represents what may be put in place to positively shape the operation. The ways that all of these people are impacted by this practice can lead to controversial points. As intercountry adoption is widening it opens up for possible illegal activity. The people who realize the issue and want to fix the troubles against those who just want to close the process once it shows corruption presents opposing sides. The controversy of International adoption leads individuals to come to a personal
…show more content…
It allows children to experience a better living situation then they would in their home country (Whittaker and Finley 1). Their native country may have poor housing, a lack of education, and the overall health and sanitation may be meager. The child should have a right to have a family that loves them with a positive surrounding of love and happiness. Being denied just the chance to have a family of their own is the real abuse when not being placed for adoption. A family could structure the child's life, but blood ties do not mean that is the optimum place for a child (Davies 51-56). International adoption is there as an option for removing children and infants who are orphans in their country of origin and heightening their living standards. This transaction has lead to the occurrence that ¨over 20,000 children are adopted to the United States annually¨ (Whittaker and Finley 1-2). When countries bring international adoption to a close, it shuts down thousands of children's possibilities to have a family welcome them to their home. This happened in Romania when they halted international adoption and left the orphaned and abandoned children with almost zero hope of finding a family. These children are all left up to the country's welfare structures that often are under par with what would have been through international adoption (Yemm
It allows children to experience a better living situation then they would in their home country (Whittaker and Finley 1). Their native country may have poor housing, a lack of education, and the overall health and sanitation may be meager. The child should have a right to have a family that loves them with a positive surrounding of love and happiness. Being denied just the chance to have a family of their own is the real abuse when not being placed for adoption. A family could structure the child's life, but blood ties do not mean that is the optimum place for a child (Davies 51-56). International adoption is there as an option for removing children and infants who are orphans in their country of origin and heightening their living standards. This transaction has lead to the occurrence that ¨over 20,000 children are adopted to the United States annually¨ (Whittaker and Finley 1-2). When countries bring international adoption to a close, it shuts down thousands of children's possibilities to have a family welcome them to their home. This happened in Romania when they halted international adoption and left the orphaned and abandoned children with almost zero hope of finding a family. These children are all left up to the country's welfare structures that often are under par with what would have been through international adoption (Yemm