As the narrator questions deep affection, it can be interpreted that she frowns upon the idea of love. Szymborska strongly believes the prize for love is nonexistent as she claims that it is "for nothing." She has no faith in love; she believes that loving a person is unimportant. Additionally, she proposes the inquiry of "what does the world get from two people who exist in a world of their …show more content…
She questions why the "light" shines "on these two and not others;" however, patience is needed because love occurs when one is least expecting it. Not everybody falls in love at the same time, but few people might find their true love quicker than others; rushing into it may lead to an outcome that is the opposite of what one was dreaming for. Although, even a non-superficial reader can sense that Szymorska 's reasons seem as if they are excuses. The narrator continues to extract her anger on the "unfairness" of love, claiming that it disrupts our principles; however, what she fails to realize is that a distraction will always appear whether it be love or not. As she continues, a change of tone occurs by the