DNR In Health Care

Improved Essays
For the major focal point of this discourse, as explained before, advance directives are used to convey the patient and families’ preference in treatment, including to do or not resuscitate when the patient may suffer from cardiac or respiratory arrest after. The aim of CPR is to save the patient, but the evidence shows that the implementation of CPR does not ensure a high rate of survival to hospital discharge (Enohumah et al., 2006; Landry, Parker, & Phillips, 1992; McNally et al., 2011). Due to this, the policy began to develop to limit the use of CPR and in carrying out the DNR order. In reference to this issue, Quinlan case has increased the concern (Coburn, 1977). The conflict evolved between the physician and patient’s father in determining …show more content…
Apart of that, the term “AND” (allow natural death), is becoming a preferred term to replace DNR to emphasise the order to allow natural consequences of a disease or injury, and to allow the patient to die naturally (Breault, 2011; Venneman, Narnor-Harris, Perish, & Hamilton, 2008). While a variety of terms have been suggested, throughout this discussion the term DNR will be used to refer to the preference of patient or healthcare power of attorney for do not attempt resuscitation. It is likewise significant to remark here that sometimes the term DNR is confusing since the interpretation varies between organisations. Some people may interpret DNR as not performing CPR without intubation, others may interpret DNR as utilising drugs only (Clark et al., 1994), and likewise some people may read it by avoiding all lifesaving intervention such as intubation, chest compression, and drugs (Keffer & Keffer, 1992). For most relevant interpretation, DNR orders might apply only to resuscitation (Burkhardt & Nathaniel, 2008). In other words, in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest, there should be no attempt at resuscitation. Presuming no arrest occur, the patient may recover …show more content…
From the perspective of a pro for DNR order, most of the articles were reviewed as being concern in regards to the patient’s autonomy, which the patient have the right in refusing for CPR and requesting for DNR order (Braddock & Derbenwick, 2014; Fitzgerald, Milzman, & Sulmasy, 1994; Hilberman, Kutner, Parsons, & Murphy, 1997; Layon, 1994; Mullen & Gow, 2010). In several countries such as the UK, US, and Germany, the law allows the competent patient to refuse any form of healthcare treatment (as cited in Saevareid & Balandin, 2011), including CPR and the refusal is morally acceptable if the patient is given an explanation of the consequences of every decision (Mullen & Gow, 2010). From the essence of this ethical principle, healthcare providers including physicians and nurses should respect the patient’s preference in their healthcare decision even it contradict to their beliefs and values. Other than that, the physician is responsible for documenting the patient’s preference either for refusing CPR or requesting DNR in their medical file (Layon,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However the patient must meet a list of requirements and go through a psychological evaluation first. This ensures they are mentally capable of making the decision to medically end their life. Though legalized, “Catholic hospitals have long taken the position that they will not provide medical services that contradict Catholic religious principles” and doctors within religious hospitals have used the term ‘gagged’ to “describe their inability… to share important information with their patients about their rights” (Stewart, 2015). The general culture has evolved to seeing dying with dignity as a respectable act. In contradiction, regardless of state law, the Catholic hospitals will not perform what is culturally unacceptable to them.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death With Dignity: A Commentary Sergej Jagodin Millersville University Medical Aid in Dying: A Commentary The ability to choose when to die is not a topic that is heavily discussed throughout a person’s life. What constitutes dying early and on one’s own terms? Is it moral? Is it right?…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The use of terminology such as DNR, no code, and slow code are all used everyday in the health care setting. They all relate to omitting or delaying life saving measure to be preformed on someone who is dying. Patients and patient’s power of attorneys have the right to making these burdensome decisions. Death and dying is considered a very dirty word in today’s society. Some people are ignorant to what the true definition of what having good quality of life is.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the shortage of organs available for donation, the criteria to consider a body for donation has changed from “brain death” to “circulatory death”, making organs available sooner. This change in practice has caused ethical dilemmas among the healthcare environment. In a “2006 study found that some perioperative nurses did not accept the irreversibility of cardiac death” (37). A nurse is trained to save lives, and this practice goes against that notion. A nurse must set aside her own personal views and help the family exercise their right to the choices that they…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These are all end of life decisions that must be talked about, so that one’s family would know what to do in case of a situation involving any of these. CPR is a procedure used when someone’s heart stops or breathing stops (Understanding Advance Directives, 2006). DNR is a written order signed by a physician to stop healthcare teams from preforming CPR. This is only done by the request of the patient and can be cancelled at any time (Understanding Advance Directives, 2006). DNI, may be asked for along with the DNR, is the placement of tubes through a person’s nose or mouth to enter the windpipe to help them breath.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many wonder if euthanasia is right and moral and if it is not what should be done when being faced with this situation. I think the best way to look at physician-assisted euthanasia is through consequentialism and deontology. It’s important we look at the consequences of physician-assisted suicide because they are literally the difference between life and death. A patient that is gravely ill or in a coma may be diagnosed and given a time limit until death, however, some patients have surprised their doctors.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician-Assisted Death Introduction The ethical dilemma I chose is physician-assisted death. I chose this because it has been in the news and it is a topic which has always interested me as a nurse I very much value life but also believe in one being able to make their own decisions regarding their health care but do not believe this is meant to involve takings one’s own life. Ethical Dilemma Physician-assisted death, is it right or is it wrong? Is it our right to choose when and how we die?…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Every day healthcare workers must make decisions when providing care to their patients. Some of those decisions are clear cut such as providing medicine that will stop nausea or medications that will relieve the pain of a heart attack. Other decisions in healthcare blur the lines of bioethics. One such area is end of life care and whether to assist a terminally ill patient to die. The practice of assisted suicide has been given names such as "death with dignity" or "right to die" to make it more palatable to individuals.…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    End-of-life healthcare decisions are one of the most challenging aspects of medical treatment. In end-of-life healthcare decisions, a decision frequently must be made between advanced medical intervention and allowing the patient to die peacefully. Although everyone involved in a patient’s treatment wants what is best for a patient, the situation can become a challenging ethical dilemma because what is best for a patient is often unclear. If extraordinary medical intervention is attempted and allows the patient to continue living a happy life, that is clearly an awesome outcome.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    From a patient’s perspective that is in suffering, physician-assisted suicide might seem like a god send. The option to be relieved from the pain of a slow death at the cost of immediately ending their life seems grim and pointless, but to the dying, perhaps not. It was found that requests for euthanasia are frequently made by patients to doctors that practice specialties typically revolving around terminal patients. [Meier, D., Emmons, C. A., Wallenstein, S., Quill, T., Morrison, R. S., & Cassel, C. K., 1998]. The reasons patients ask for physicians to take part in ending their life are usually if they are in extreme pain, are a burden upon family members or caregivers, or have no personal dignity left.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It does not include judging that a life that can be preserved is not worth preserving, overriding the opinion of the person whose life it is”. (David N. O’Steen, Ph.D. & Burke J. Balch, JD). Thus, physicians should not empower patients to consider ending their own life as it violates their role of a healer and keeping patients alive. As the availability of physician-assisted suicide increases, elderly, disabled, or depressed patients are likely to suffer from a more pressured phase to end their…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Contrarily, in PAD, the patient him or herself is the instigator of death (2007, p. 127). In the discussion of physician-assisted death, the nurse’s position varies significantly from the physician. As patient advocates, nurses assist in patient’s decisions relative to their end-of-life care. This paper aims to develop an understanding of patient-assisted death and its implications to the nursing profession. Additionally, it will tackle the current Canadian laws, ethical considerations, and the role of the nurse…

    • 1312 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Decision Maker Would you be able to “pull the plug” on a loved one? No one should be alone when making such a massive decision like this as well as when experiencing a death. When we think of children, we do not usually think about death. The article “When Living Is a Fate Worse than Death” by Christine Mitchell argues that doctor’s should have the control over deciding life or death for a patient. The author’s argument is ineffective because the text lacks in facts, is one-sided, and gives a negative tone.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ntroduction The Legal right to die describes in any situation of an adult who is in state of sound mind to decide about his or her treatment to be continued or not, where such voluntary, informed decision is made, should be recognized and respected. According to Lord Goff of Chieveley in 1993, at p. 864, in Airedale NHS Trust versus Bland [1993], the House of Lords held that “The principle of self-determination requires that respect must be given to the wishes of the patient. If an adult patient of sound mind refuses, however unreasonably, to consent to treatment or care by which his life would or might be prolonged, the doctors responsible for his care must give effect to his wishes, even though they do not consider it to be in his best interests to do so. […] To this extent, the principle of the sanctity of human life must yield to the principle of self-determination”.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays