"Once upon a time, it was a man’s world,” states David Brooks firmly. For centuries it has been understood that men rule over the more important dominant and power positions of the world. From great male pharaohs, to an increasingly systematic view of presidency, men have been able to manipulate genetic gender roles in order to instill the notion that it’s truly a world only able to stand with the leadership of men. However, contrary to the beliefs of the gender based roles of conduct in society, that represent males as supreme in intelligence and in physical dominance, we have evolved into an era where woman carry an equivalent and sometimes ever greater capacity to strive for success than ever before over men.
To begin with, no longer …show more content…
Revisiting Brooks ' statement of how "the first days of school, girls out perform boys," he also highlights how the gap doesn 't dissolve as the years progress. "In high school, girls get higher grades in every subject," and also how females are more inclined to take many of the academic opportunities that are in front of them such as enrolling in advanced placement courses and even being involved of many of the extracurricular activities that build rapport and social circles such as student government and yearbook as evident by the DOE. The progress doesn 't stop in college either. Female dominance and leadership excels in college. As Brooks says, "women are more likely to enroll in college and they are more likely to have better applications," illustrating how females are opportunity driven. The female focus leads to 60-40 female- make ratios in colleges and higher female graduate percentage rates. It 's no coincidence that females value the perks that come with a higher education which is higher paying jobs and their dominance is only more supported by Brooks ' claim of how the only disadvantage females will face with such an excelled intelligence is that it 'll be rare to find a male counterpart that suits their
To begin with, no longer …show more content…
Revisiting Brooks ' statement of how "the first days of school, girls out perform boys," he also highlights how the gap doesn 't dissolve as the years progress. "In high school, girls get higher grades in every subject," and also how females are more inclined to take many of the academic opportunities that are in front of them such as enrolling in advanced placement courses and even being involved of many of the extracurricular activities that build rapport and social circles such as student government and yearbook as evident by the DOE. The progress doesn 't stop in college either. Female dominance and leadership excels in college. As Brooks says, "women are more likely to enroll in college and they are more likely to have better applications," illustrating how females are opportunity driven. The female focus leads to 60-40 female- make ratios in colleges and higher female graduate percentage rates. It 's no coincidence that females value the perks that come with a higher education which is higher paying jobs and their dominance is only more supported by Brooks ' claim of how the only disadvantage females will face with such an excelled intelligence is that it 'll be rare to find a male counterpart that suits their