The Ethics Of Natural Law Harris Analysis

Improved Essays
In “The Ethics of Natural Law,” C.E. Harris explains the views of natural-law theorists. First, he states that the moral standard of natural law is that the actions that promote the values that follow the natural inclinations of human beings are right. These values include life, procreation, knowledge, and sociability. Anything, such as murder, birth control, stifling intellectual curiosity, or spreading lies, that opposes these four natural inclinations is wrong. Then, Harris notes that natural-law theory is absolutist, explaining that no values specified by natural inclinations may be violated and values cannot be measured or compared. Along with this, moral judgements must take into account the intentions of the person performing the action. Despite …show more content…
If he causes a close family member to be upset or notices that they are extremely upset for another reason, he might struggle with what he could do to fix it, even if it’s beyond his control. He wants to alleviate pain and stress from his family members so he will occasionally grapple with ways to help them feel better, whether he caused it and has the ability to help or it is completely apart from him and helping may be impossible. His sport, lacrosse, is the only other thing that has ever kept him up at night. If an injury or something frustrating within a practice or game occurs, he may stay up thinking about how it could have gone differently. With injuries, he realizes that it’s not something he can fix, so the more he thinks about it the more frustrated he grows. On the other hand, thinking about a frustrating practice, teammate, or coach can occasionally be productive, allowing him to learn how to improve or maybe confront someone about it. The aspects of his life that are most important to him are what keeps him up at

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I appreciate your points on provision 2 and 3 of the Code of Ethics set forth by the American Nurses Association. Provision 3 states that the nurse acts as an advocate for the patient, protecting their rights health and safety (ANA, 2015). From the onset of nursing school we learn that nurses are the patients advocate. It seems almost cliché after many years in the clinical setting and at times I think nurses advocate for patients in ways they are not even aware. Currently I work in the ambulatory care setting of a busy neurosurgical practice.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The central point that chapter four is asking is whether or not morality depends on religion. The chapter begins with a story about Judge Moore of Alabama and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The ACLU sued Judge Moore "...for displaying the Ten Commandments in his courtroom. " This was a problem according to the ACLU because, it violates the separation of church and state. Judge Moore however, used this incident to become chief justice.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis Abortion

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Also referred to as the law of self-preservation, natural law is based on reason and natural inclination. Natural inclination allows a person to see something as good and desirable, while reason helps us to understand that natural inclination must be pursued only for fundamental desires and not desires that develop under momentary feelings. To better guide the decisions of humans, Natural Law provides five precepts: natural inclination for the good, natural inclination for the preservation of life, natural inclination for the preservation of the species, natural inclination to the known truth, and natural inclination to live in society. Based on the definition of natural law this theory would agree with Don Marquis conclusion of abortion. Overall Marquis concludes that abortion is morally wrong because it forcefully removes the right of a “future like ours” to the fetus.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    when an athlete withdraws from a specific sport due to a newfound lack of interest. It is characterized by “perceptions of emotion and physical exhaustion, reduced accomplishment, and sport devaluation” (“Athlete Social Support, Negative Social Interactions, And Psychological Health Across A Competitive Sport Season” 619). This psychological state has become very common at the collegiate level. According…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though people have this common intuition about morality, people frequently create moral judgements about others based on factors that are not within their control. For example, Driver A and Driver B are both driving down a road. Driver A momentarily takes their eyes off of the road and runs a red light as a child is crossing the street. Driver A slams on the breaks and tries anything to not hit the child;…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eric Lewis Jr Professor David Spiegel Ethics 112 September 24, 2015 Unspeakable Ethics, Unnatural law I've read through Arthur Leff's article, Unspeakable, Ethics, Unnatural law made December of 1979 at Duke University School of Law. I found the article to be very complex and extensive. His questioning and methods to unspeakable ethics, and unnatural laws are somewhat contradictory. In this paper Leff deals with the strain and conflict between what he calls “found law” and “made law.” Leff in this article is talking about how mankind came along, sharing there is no analogue to God.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dark Ghettos Essay

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Natural Law theorists argue that moral standards are based on the objective nature of the world and that legal standards derive their authority from these moral standards. Aquinas argues that law is, “Nothing else than an ordinance of reason for the common good, promulgated by him who has the care of the community.” This is very similar to Austin’s command theory, in which laws are commands by a sovereign to citizens, and commands are orders that are backed up by threats. The difference here is that the sovereign can only give orders to their citizens if they are a good person. Aquinas argues that just laws are consistent with natural law and are thus unbreakable, but unjust laws are inconsistent with natural law and are thus…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Including a Michigan football player who suffered from depression but, did not realize the symptoms until the effects on him were so great that he could no longer handle himself. The new divorce of his parents, a brand new home at college, and the expectation to play college football at a Division 1 school was all too much for Heininger. Over the period of his freshman year Heininger experienced signs of mental health issues, such as eating disorders, anxiety, mood swings, but most apparent depression. Heininger did not feel the need to seek help with his condition, and therefore suffered from these mental health issues for much longer than he should have. In the article “Mind, Body and Sport: How Being Injured Affects Mental Health” Putukian explains how mental health is an issue with athletes in every level.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The interesting aspect of morality is how universally unbiased it is supposed to be, but yet, is still met with a debate towards what is morally correct and morally wrong. While morality is supposed to be objective, there is a subjectivity to whom those morals apply to and to whom they benefit or harm. In Chelsea Schein and Kurt Gray’s "The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm,” they discussed the evolution of morality and how difficult it is to establish a clear answer on what morality is. Schein and Gray wrote, “[one] definition of moral judgment is ‘evaluations (good vs. bad) of the actions or character of a person that are made with respect to a set of virtues held to be obligatory by a culture or subculture’ (Haidt, 2001, p. 817)” (Schein and Gray 35).…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For centuries, philosophers have applied sets of normative principles in effort to distinguish if an action is morally right or wrong. The purpose of normative ethics is to help guide society on how humans ought to act. These theories provide justifiable and reliable outcomes to determine if an action is moral or immoral. Two principles that play a significant role in normative ethics are consequentialism and Kantianism. When faced with a moral dilemma, these theories may agree or conflict with one another.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the end, the behavior one engages in comes down to not only one’s morals, but also their…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Hart-Fuller debate is arguably one of the most interesting and contentious debates in jurisprudence. The debate clearly highlights the divide between two jurisprudential schools of thought: legal positivism and natural law, particularly in the context of Nazi laws. The multitudinous nature of jurisprudential inquiry concerning the relationship between law and morality allows for numerous conflicting interpretations and opinions. Therefore, it is important to limit the scope of this essay.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of ‘law’ has proven itself a tricky one to articulate. Despite its relevance within society, it is hard to condense the idea of law down to its core tenets. In their quest for a concise definition, legal theorists have approached law from different angles, and have tended to divide themselves into two groups – those who believe that any summation of law must include reference to morality, and those who believe that the idea of law either can or must be completely distinguished from any moral considerations. This essay will consider the views of hard and soft legal positivists Joseph Raz and H.L.A. Hart, and natural law theorist Thomas Aquinas, in order to argue that, while all of these theories capture something of the relationship…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are a few differences between natural law and legal positivism. However, before diving into the differences, a definition for both the theories should be provided. Basically, a natural law is a law in which is derived from the validity of morality and reasoning. Natural law is believed to be served on the best interest of the common good as well. For legal positivism, it is viewed in the source of a law has no connection between reasoning and morality.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the law of delict there are five elements that should be considered before someone is held liable for an act that caused damage. These elements include the nature of the act, the wrongfulness/unlawfulness of the act, the damage caused by the act, that causal link and lastly the fault. If the evidence obtained from the act and matched against the element is adequate and proves that the act caused the damage then it can be concluded that the act did indeed cause the act and someone or an organisation will be held liable for the damage caused and will have to face certain consequences. In most case at school the educator is held responsible for the damage the learners suffered but educators cannot be held accountable for everything that happens…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays