Humans kill for justice, giving them the opportunity to know what it’s like to be a real human. For those who dictates, one feel that the only way out of the harsh dictation is to rebel. Rebelling for freedom. In the end man’s inhumanity to man. “So we have created a new arm of the law: The Grammaton Cleric, whose sole task is to seek out and eradicate the true source of man’s inhumanity to man - his ability to feel”(Narrator, 1:15) Man must live by laws that question humanity within the movie. The attempt to avoid war and killing is contradicting the law itself. In order to stop violence, you must use …show more content…
The purpose of existence is to feel and when that purpose is taken away, one can no longer say he’s alive because now he only lives. Life is so precious but one may feel that violence is the key to showing who’s in charge. We are living human beings but we are not perfect and violence has kept mankind existing. No matter how much a society could change, violence will always be a part of that society. For example many Americans want to pursue the “banned guns” law but doing so will not necessarily deter the crime rate within the United States. America is said to be one of the most warlike societies on the face of the planet, having intervened militarily around the world more than 150 times since 1850. Within such a society, not surprisingly, the intellectual traditions that support the view that aggression is more a function of nature than nurture”(Alfie Kohn). Violence is something that can be maintained to a low level but can’t be stop completely. What is responsible for war? Some say that it’s the culture of all living beings or perhaps just simply human nature. In the movie where the leader used violence in order to stop violence making man confused about the inner soul. The violence occurred in the killings of the resistance, enforcers, and father. Even though every life is worthwhile, violence lives on as a way to