• Home Page
  • The Democratic-Republican Interpretation Of The Constitution

The Democratic-Republican Interpretation Of The Constitution

Decent Essays
Show More
During the period of 1801 through 1817, the conflict of the Democratic-Republican views on the constitution were arguing against the ideas of the Federalists. The two parties believed in completely different ideas of how to interpret the constitution. Although the parties knew they must come to some agreement in how the constitution should be interpreted they both had some very good reasons there party was correct. The Democratic-Republicans believed in interpreting the constitution exactly. This means that the Congress or the President should follow the constitution word for word. While the Federalist party held the ideas of general meaning. That said, the Congress or the President has the right to interpret the constitution based on significance. Over all this means that if the constitution doesn’t say it can’t do something then the Federalists believe they have a right to do it. As you can see the two parties show very different ways that they view the constitution as a whole. …show more content…
(Broad constitution is a theory of interpretation of the Constitution that holds that the spirit of the times, the values of the justices, and the needs of the nation may legitimately influence the decisions of a court, particularly the Supreme Court.) During the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, this characterization is only true to a certain extent because despite their opposition against broad construction, they both found the need to follow the Democratic-Republican path when stepping up to power as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Strict Constructionists Dbq Analysis
    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Strict Constructionists Dbq Analysis

    The Democrat-Republicans had to adopt Federalist beliefs to "keep up with the times" defined in laws such as the Embargo Act, and the Louisiana Purchase. Vice versa, the Federalists had to adopt Republican stances to somewhat partially hold their power in the nation, holding conventions and authoring journals that eventually led to their…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Adams Vs. Jefferson: A Turning Point In American History
    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Adams Vs. Jefferson: A Turning Point In American History

    Adams Vs Jefferson is the gripping account of a turning point in American history, a dramatic struggle between two parties with profoundly different visions of how the nation should be governed. The federalists, led by Adams, were conservatives who favored strong government. The Republicans led by Jefferson, were more egalitarian and believed that the federalists had betrayed the Revolution of 1776 and were backsliding toward monarchy. Jefferson and Adams continued to serve the country they helped create for many years. Adam was later the first United States minister to the Court of St James in England and Jefferson served as governor of Virginia and then a US minister to France.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Did Jefferson Defeated President Thomas
    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Did Jefferson Defeated President Thomas

    The election was a government change from the Federalist party to the Democratic- Republican party. I was also brought to the attention to one of the Constitution's flaws, was forcing the winner to be decided by the House of Representatives. When the election was finalized it was resulted in the democratic-republican party had won the election of the politics of 1820. This was the beginning of the end for the federalists party and the start to the 12th amendment. ” The Revolution of 1800” was considered one of the most peaceful changes of an executive party in the United States.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Unifying The Constitution Dbq Analysis
    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Unifying The Constitution Dbq Analysis

    The Federalist for having support for the Constitution followed what happened through the signing of the Constitution. During the Constitutional Convention the Constitution was signed(Document 6). The vote came to be 187 to 168 . It established the national government of America, fundamental laws, and guaranteed rights for citizens. Both political parties were worried about things stated in the Constitution.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Revolution Of 1800 Dbq Analysis
    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Revolution Of 1800 Dbq Analysis

    On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans told about how uncentralized the United States would be if they were under the federal during Adams's presidency. Republicans' agreed that they wanted to expand of the U.S. army and navy, undertake on individual rights in the Alien and Sedition Acts, and new taxes and decrease the spending money used to support many of the federal actions that were being done. The main thing the Federalists wanted was a strong federal authority to prevent the extras of popular majorities, while the Democratic-Republicans wanted to take away majority of the national authority so that the people could rule more through state governments and let it be brought to one as a whole…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Alien Acts Dbq Analysis
    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alien Acts Dbq Analysis

    In 1798 Congress passed four laws attempting to strengthen the federal government called the Alien and Sedition Acts. The acts made it possible for the federalists to revolt against Democratic-Republicans and to gain more power for themselves. The acts didn’t allow anyone to criticize the government at all; and it extended the time allowed to become an American citizen, since the federalists thought most of the new population would become democratic-republicans. The two political parties focused on domestic and foreign policy differences. The two parties had their biggest differences with the passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts because both thought the other party would take all the control by limiting the power of the other party.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hamiltonians In The 1790s
    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hamiltonians In The 1790s

    The people of the Early Republic of the 1790s had very distinct, opposing views of one another on how the government should operate under a new constitution. These disputes stemmed from the adoption of beliefs from Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, who originally were highly opposed to factions. Their ideas were vastly accepted by two different groups: the Hamiltonians and the Jeffersonians. The many issues they disagreed on were nearly opposite one another, and ultimately lead to the creation of the first party system consisting of the Federalists and Republicans. Initially, these two men were very much against factions.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffersonian Republicans Vs Federalists
    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jeffersonian Republicans Vs Federalists

    Despite the lack of political segregation at the birth of the constitution, by conclusion of federalist John Adams’ presidency, two distinct parties emerged: the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. These political parties held opposing views on numerous topics including states’ rights, the power of the federal government, and most importantly, the interpretation of the Constitution. While both political parties signed to the laws written in the Constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. When the national government changed from the hold of the Federalists to the hold of the Jeffersonian Republicans during the Revolution…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Articles Of Confederation Dbq
    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    Dividing the parties almost completely in half were two groups with called the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists were more for a weak central government and more power to individual states, also their biggest argument was for a Bill of Rights. Now on the other hand the Federalists wanted a stronger central government and were against a Bill of Rights because they believed the government would give them rights. The Anti-Federalists main argument for a Bill of Rights was that there were certain rights that were guaranteed to people that the government should not infringe upon.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Compromises Of The Constitutional Convention
    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Compromises Of The Constitutional Convention

    The federalist of the Constitution were the people who supported it. The anti-federalist were those who went against it. Federalist thought that the Constitution was based on federalism. The anti-federalist believed that the Constitution took too much power away from the states and did not insured rights for the people. The federalists even wrote essays to answer the anti-federalist attacks to the Constitution.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Rise Of Political Parties In The 1790s Essay
    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rise Of Political Parties In The 1790s Essay

    The Democratic-Republicans felt that there should be a strict interpretation, which meant that the Constitution should be followed word for word. Both parties also had different views on the government. “Therefore it was that the Constitution restrained them to the necessary means, that is to say, to those means without the grant of the power would be nugatory (useless)” (Document A). Thomas Jefferson’s strict interpretation is demonstrated in this statement.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Similarities And Differences Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists
    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Similarities And Differences Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Strict Interpretation Of The Constitution
    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Strict Interpretation Of The Constitution

    Strict Interpretation of the Constitution Strict interpretation means that the Constitution must explicitly grant a power or privilege in order for that action to be legal. A loose interpretation doesn’t give any safeguards against government intrusion on the people’s liberty. Strict interpretation is better because it is an approach more likely to get to what the original intent of the Founders of America was. Whereas loose interpretationists can make new laws and invalidate old ones based on an understanding of the Constitution.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Strict Interpretation Of The Constitution
    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Strict Interpretation Of The Constitution

    The Republicans sought for limited interpretation of the Constitution, which is known as having a strict construction. The reason they believed in having a strict construction of the Constitution was specifically to make the language clear and unambiguous. Also having a strict adherence was that if it was left open, this would allow for the constitution to be unsecure, which created the danger of the government becoming too powerful and would pose as one of the greatest threats to an individual’s liberties. This is the reason the colonist had fought in not having a national government that would employ their powers leading them back to monarchy. To Republicans, the ideas of unlimited power would restrict them from having the blessings of liberty.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist Vs. Anti-Federalists
    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalist Vs. Anti-Federalists

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings