Summary Of Paley's Argument From Design

Improved Essays
The argument from design, or teleological argument, is an argument that states everything in the world is made just so that we can manage to live in it, and if the world was ever so little different we could not manage to live in it” (Philosophy 57-58). In 1802 William Paley’s introduced his own argument where he compared the complexity of living things to the complexity of a watch. Just as a watch would not be able to exist without a watchmaker, Paley argues living thing would not be able to exist without an intelligent designer. More than a century later Bertand Russell delivered an argument in which he used Darwin’s Natural Selection theory to argue against the argument from design. Russell argued that “living things have adapted to their …show more content…
First, it performs a type of function that an intelligent being would perceive as valuable; the watch is able to perform the function of keeping time which is a job that an intelligent being would see has value. Secondly, the watch would not be able to perform it’s function if the parts were differently sized or arranged; the ability of the watch to keep time depends on numerous factors such as being the precise shape and the arrangement of these parts suggests that the watch was designed by some intelligent designer who designed precisely to perform these tasks. Using the analogy of a watch, Paley argues that the creation of the world happened just like a watch would. Since it can be concluded that the world posses much complexity in relation to its function and all the parts that go into its design, there must be an intelligent designer who created it and this is whom we know as …show more content…
This person would then be able to come to the conclusion to know that it was not possible to have sprung up by chance. Just like the watch, the world is the same way. Russell’s argument does not explain this however. It simply explains why the living organisms are not that of a design. His argument also fails to take into account that it is possible for a design in an object to go unrecognized. There’s a possibly that there was a design present for natural selection to take place among biological species however it was not needed until deemed necessary. Paley would argue like there is in a watch, there many parts that may go unnoticed for a long period of time. Nonetheless this does not mean they are not important and are not apart of the design. We may only begin to see their importance when the time is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will analyze the argument of the “Fine-Tuned Universe”, describe what it means, show how an opponent would argue that intelligent design isn’t the best explanation, and also provide my own view on this argument from my theist view. Have you ever wondered how the universe got here? How everything perfectly fell into place, and how you’re here today? The Fine Tuned Universe argument may help you better understand. This argument is a version of the teleological argument, which is an argument for an intelligent creator, that basically suggests there are many very specific things that make life possible, and if any of these very specific things were to be altered, life as we know it would be highly unlikely to exist.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The addition of natural laws and biological aspects to the natural world provide dissimilarity between the two claims within Paley’s argument. Darwin’s idea of evolution yields an explanation to the apparent order, complexity, and purposefulness in nature that was once unexplainable, and which was the basis of Paley’s natural design…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Teleological Argument for the Existence of God, also known as “Arguments from Design”, states that a designer must exist because the universe and living things exhibit marks of design in their order, consistency, unity, and pattern, and that designer is God. One of the analogies used for this argument is William Paley’s Watch Maker Argument. He gives the scenario: if you were to find a watch in an open field you would automatically assume that it was designed and did not just randomly form out of thin air. Based off this argument, if you agree that the universe and its inhabitants are designed in some way for a purpose, then there must be a designer responsible, which would be God. Believers in the Teleological Argument also argue that scientists and evolutionists are unable to explain how complex organisms such as the eye originated.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He claims that the entire strength of the argument that Paley proposes is based on the strength of his analogy from man-made complex objects to the complexity and purpose of occurrences within nature. It is a large jump to assume that just because we deem a watch as a complex set of parts that work together for a common goal and has a designer, and the universe is similar regarding having parts that work together, that it must have a designer. When we are starting with the watch, and trying to connect those similarities to the universe it isn’t as difficult as starting with the universe and trying to draw similarities to a watch. The watch is very specific and has a finite amount of parts in it, and when Paley is comparing this to the universe, he is comparing something finite into something that is seemingly infinite. Of course, this would seem easy to do because you will eventually always find something to compare a part in a watch to out of the infinite amount and broadness that is within the universe.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Teleological Argument

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages

    He calls this argument the Watchmaker Analogy. Paley's Watchmaker Analogy is making the comparison of the complexity of a watch to the complexity of the human organs, specifically the eye. Because of the complexity of the human organs their must be a supreme designer, namely God, that designed human…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. In the documentary video of Judgement Day: Intelligent Design on Trial, the basic conflict in the town of Dover, PA is that the school board of Dover High school intended to introduce the theory of Intelligence Design to the science class in the ninth grade, trying to break the exclusive mode of setting Darwin’s evolution theory as monopoly. Some residents, mainly the parents of the ninth grade students who insisted their beliefs on Darwin’s theory sued the school board for enforcing the teaching policies of including the intelligence design theory in the science classes. 2. The basic principles and origin of the theory of evolution by natural selection is that species arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Will sponsors in Intelligent Design be able to embrace the promising and innovative solutions outlined in Luke Bawazer’s Tedtalk while rejecting Darwin’s theory? Does the science discussed by Bawazer relate to Bronowski’s belief about science as imaginative and creative? We will find out if this bond between James Bronowski his notion of the nature of scientific reasoning and Luke Bawazer comparing to Edward Wilsons theory of intelligent evolution. Jacob Bronowski (2012) writes about Copernicus’s route to enlightenment as an obscure theorist challenging the common science of his time, his first stage was his mind to raise him from the planet, and put him enthusiastically, theoretically into the sun. This action signifies the start of…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Natural Theology, William Paley uses an example of a self-replicating watch to argue for the existence of a universal creator. He believes that the universe, like the watch, has an innate, intricate design and as such, a designer. Paley argues that if the watch were capable of creating identical copies of itself his argument would not weaken, but actually be supported. For Paley this is because the watch itself is not responsible for its design or purpose, and merely passes these aspects to the successive identical watches. However this concept hinges on the watch not being its own designer, and the designer being responsible for its current and consistent appearance.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coyne states, “Although organisms appear designed to fit their natural environments, the idea of perfect design is an illusion” (Coyne, 2009, pg. 81). Basically, that organisms were man made and not naturally…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zayd Boucaud Professor Sarah Allen Philosophy December 4, 2017 "Cleanthes' Argument from Design" This essay will divulge into the deeper meaning of Cleanthes’ argument from design, with an explanation of not only his views, but the opposition’s as well (with a further understanding about why his argument may be proven invalid.) Cleanthes’ premises (leading to his valid conclusion) will have further, more simple explanations that will show his own reasoning in favor of God’s existence.) Flaws in his argument will be displayed subsequently, which will lead to the conclusion of his argument overall: ample validity but simply lacking soundness.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume objected that there are numerous differences between humans and watches. The large amount of differences make the analogy void. Additionally, David Hume argued that the sample size for William Paley’s argument is too small. David Hume is correct that the argument would benefit from increasing the sample size but it is impossible to provide evidence from every possible universe, let alone one universe. William Paley contends that since there is a watch maker for a watch, there is a universe maker for the universe.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Natural Selection Dbq

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the period from 1860-1900, Darwin developed his theory of natural selection. Natural selection was the idea that a dominant species would overcome all the rest. This sparked many ideas and philosophies, such as a weakening in the church, the rise of Social Darwinism, and a surge of new ideas and thought. The church had always been the lead in the sciences of the day, but when scientists started to challenge the church, their strength began to falter.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cleanthes' argument from design for God's existence is not convincing. He compares two different ideas and thus, wrongly generalizes. He also commits a fallacy, and doesn’t meet the criteria necessary for the type of argument he offers. Although, a few potential strong points are present in his beliefs, like the improbability of chance, and the incomprehensible evidence of God, they are still not strong enough for His justification. Cleanthes through an a posteriori, inductive argument claims that since the presence of small machines (i.e. houses) implies human design, the presence of an even bigger machine (i.e. the universe) implies a human-like intelligence behind it as well as "the adapting of means to ends in natural and human machines…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I felt the argument was needed to question the creationist that, “Did he create to mimic evolution and test our faith thereby?” (Gould, 256). In his last argument, he not only proves the evidence of evolution in an efficient way, by pointing out fossil records and evolved features, but also by questioning the logic to why God would add more revolutionary features to organisms over the…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, the exact moment when that system was formed can be traced back to the evolutionary transition from the reptilian to mammalian jaw. This is, in Miller’s view “unfortunate for intelligent design. ” [6] Another argument commonly used by the creationism opposed philoso- phers, is that there could exist natural, non-intelligent processes that are re- sponsible for the supposedly “irreducibly complex” systems. One such the- orythatiscommonlyusedisStuarKaufmann’stheoryofself-organization. [ 5 ] Behe himself has responded to that criticism by saying that complexity is a quantiative feature (that is, it can be measured), and that the…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays