St. Augustine's Foreknowledge Versus Free Will

Great Essays
Foreknowledge Versus Free Will
The philosophical problem concerning human sin and God’s foreknowledge lies in the principle that if God is omniscient, humans cannot be held responsible for sin. This dilemma deals primarily with determinism and libertarianism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines determinism as “the idea that every event is necessitated by antecedent events and conditions together with the laws of nature” (Hoefer, 1). Libertarianism can be defined by the denial of determinism and the presence of free will. In this paper, I will argue that although God has foreknowledge of our actions, this omniscience is not inconsistent with free will.
Although God is omniscient of future sin, free will ensures that humans are not
…show more content…
St. Augustine defines sin as “…any transgression in deed, or word, or desire, of the eternal law. And the eternal law is the divine order or will of God…” (Augustine, 27). A secular definition would be any action that removes an individual from good standing in a society. Either definition could be used for my argument but in order to avoid confusion, but this paper will use St. Augustine’s definition of sin. According to St. Augustine, humans are responsible for sin. If there is no free will and all of our actions are controlled by God, as a determinist’s position would be, it follows that individuals cannot be held responsible for their actions. However, God’s foreknowledge is just that, knowledge. Having knowledge of a future event does not mean you control the output of that event. If a friend were told that he will be happy tomorrow, when he is happy tomorrow (it must be true in order to be considered knowledge), he is happy of his own free will. Solely having knowledge of his future happiness does not control his ability to be happy. St. Augustine states: “He has foreknowledge of our (will) power. Hence power is not taken away from me due to His foreknowledge – it is thus mine all the more certainly, since He whose foreknowledge does not err foreknew that it would be mine” (Augustine, 79).
Theodicy attempts to reconcile the existence and nature of God with evidence of evil in the world. Without evil, goodness could not exist.
…show more content…
Certainly a determinist would agree that if God is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent, foreknowledge would be a necessary characteristic. Throughout the bible, God is shown to be a judge. “For we will all stand before the judgment seat of God” (Romans 14:10). How are we to be judged for our actions by God when he already decided how we will act? The use of judgment language in the bible provides compelling evidence for a libertarian view but also the reason why free will was given to humans in the first place. According to the bible, everyone’s actions will be examined during the second coming of Jesus.
Another objection to my position could be if God is good and everything he creates is good, why is there evil in the world? If God is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent, surely He would be able to create a world in which evil does not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Cahn's Argument Analysis

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The idea of moral responsibility is argued between determinists and libertarians, with the division being caused by the possibility of free will. Steven Cahn offers an explanation of the different views of free will with the three opinions being hard determinism, soft determinism, and libertarianism. In this writing, I am going to explain Cahn’s viewpoint, and his idea that freedom is not compatible with determinism. The setting for this argument begins with a criminal trial from the early twentieth century.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Augustine’s “On Free Choice of the Will”, Augustine states, “…Through whom God made all the things that were made from nothing” (4) meaning that God is the creator of all things. This makes evil an issue since if evil is a thing, and God has created all things, then it is safe to assume that God has created evil. This creates problems for those who believe that God is all loving and all powerful because if God is truly all loving, then why would he create malice for his beloved children. If God is truly good however, how could he possibly be capable to make evil exist? Augustine concludes that if God is truly perfect, then it is possible to believe that evil is not a thing at all, but simply just the absence of God’s good.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Augustine And Evil

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Free will may be viewed in two opposing ways: compatibilism and incompatibilism. According to the compatibilist tradition an action can be both totally free and also entirely caused by previous events in that your choice of action is determined by your wants, desires, values, etc. Everitt describes compatibilism concisely as: “to say you act freely is compatible with saying that your action had a cause”. By contrast the incompatibilist view, more popular among theists, does not allow an action to be both free and caused by prior events. For a choice to be genuinely free nothing must occur which guarantees the outcome of a decision, prior events may only have an influence on the free…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    As humans, we make choices every single day from the moment we wake up each morning. Some of these choices do not seem to affect our lives with much significance, such as what we choose to eat for breakfast. On the other hand, some may change our lives forever, like deciding where to attend college. The choices we make lead to the experiences we have. The texts of Antigone, Saint Augustine: Of Choice and Free Will and Into the Wild contain instances of decisions that led to experiences, which result in the realization of what is deemed right and good in life.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Psychologically speaking, as humans, we are wired to think that we have the freedom to act and do based upon our own self judgment. For simplistic reasons, let’s assume that this “freedom” is analogous to free will which is a philosophical idea in which to act freely is to have multiple open futures and possibilities, or to be able to choose between many different choices. Determinism is the belief that every event (including action, choices, and decisions) is the inevitable result of a causal chain of events. In other words, a choice with an action (A) is the inevitable result of an earlier action of an earlier choice. This principle presents a problem for the concept of free will.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Using real life situations, I can refer to Kentrell Gaulden, commonly known by his rap name NBA Youngboy. Growing up in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Gaulden was exposed to violence and harshness of the streets at a young age. Nevertheless, after catching the attention of the nation for his unique rap style, Gaulden caught the attention of the Baton Rouge police when he was taken in for attempted murder. Thousands of people that Gaulden had inspired were left scratching their head, wondering how someone with so much potential could throw it all away. An infamous example in sports is the case of former Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Free will’s existence is nearly impossible to determine but crucial to the morality of judgments. Without free will, it doesn’t stand to reason that a person can be held morally responsible for doing wrong because they had no ability to not do the wrong. Choice is the necessary factor in determining culpability. In the same way that hot soup cannot be held liable for burning someone, a person cannot be held liable for perpetrating a crime if they had no free will.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Additionally, as I have argued above, if free will and causal determinism were incompatible, then moral responsibility could never be assigned if causal determinism were true. Since I support soft determinism and therefore believe that causal determinism is true, I am inclined to believe that free will and causal determinism are compatible and that moral responsibility is not threatened. Moreover, although events are fixed, since they are determined by one’s character, judgments about moral responsibility are unaffected. One acts freely and in accordance with their beliefs, values, and reasons, and are therefore morally responsible even though causal determinism is true. For all of the above reasons, causal determinism does not threaten free will, despite the beliefs of…

    • 1043 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Do God And Evil Coincide?

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rebecca Berger Clement Philosophy 101 October, 15, 2015 Do God and Evil Coincide? The issue with the presence of evil and the existence of God is most commonly the question of “if God is all powerful and all good, why does evil exist?” or “if evil exists then would God not be all-powerful or all-good?” If God was an all-powerful being then He would be able to prevent evil things – war, disabilities, natural disasters, etc. – from happening, but since they seem to occur every day, He must not be all-powerful, and therefore must not exist since God is described all an all-powerful all-good being.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    40). This here is another question that was brought up. This is questioned because many believe that if God exists, he is our “all-knowing (or omniscient), knowing perfectly everything that happens even before it happens” (Renick, pg. 40). If this is true and God is truly an all-knowing God, then we would not have free choice. It would contradict his power.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We, human beings, in the universe, all feel as though we are making decisions and using our free will each day. We are not forced to do things, we will them to be done. The higher power of God derives in us free will. Determinism is ultimately…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of freewill and the existence of an omniscient being poses and interesting philosophical question; Can humans have free will, and co-exist with all-knowing deity, or does this create an apparent conflict? I am going to cover what the definition of these terms (freewill and omniscience) are for our discussion, bring up a few points about an apparent conflict between omniscience and freewill, and provide a conclusion as to whether or not this conflict is a strong defeater for these two ideas co-existing. During this conversation I will sometimes refer to an omniscient being as God. This is meant just as a place holder and is not intended to focus on one specific belief or ideology. The first thing we must address Is the concept…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Definition Of Evil

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Evil: Innate or Not We often think about a few questions relating to evil. What is evil? Who created evil? Does evil even exists?…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The purpose of this essay is to explain how St. Augustine ultimately solves the ‘problem of evil’ in a way that is compatible with his Christian faith by making reference to the aspects of nature of evil itself, and why we as humans sin. Augustine writes to gain better understanding of his faith. In explaining the problems of evil, Augustine provides reasonable thoughts and views about the discussion and has been solved by clearly defining that we need the guidance of God. At a stage in Augustine’s adolescence, he was eager to find gratification in ungodly pleasures and let wickedness fill him.…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will and Determinism have been discussed by philosophers for many years. Free will is associated with moral responsibility, and alternative actions that “could have” been taken over the one chosen. Determinism is the opposite view, and is associated with universal causation, and a lack of free will. Determinists believe that a person’s actions are inevitable, they are dictated by a person’s experiences, they believe nurture, nature, and even a person’s genes determine their future actions. Because of this determinists believe people hold no moral responsibility for their actions.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays