Smart Identity Theory

Superior Essays
ID: 3031785238
1. In Smart’s paper Sensations and Brain Processes, he introduces the “identity theory” in which he states that mental states are physical states of the brain. This stems from physicalism, the idea that mind is the interior cause of behavior and mental states are biochemical processes in the brain.1 Smart would consider identity statements, such as “pain is the firing of C-fibers” as contingently true. Smart argues that the statement “pain is the firing of C-fibers” is contingently true because it is possible to conceive of worlds where pain is not caused by C-fibers firing; a contingently true statement is one where the statement is true in some worlds but not all. He goes on to say that when dealing with objects A and B, if
…show more content…
Kripke coins the phrases of “rigid” and “non-rigid” designators in his attempt to evaluate the structure of identity statements. A rigid designator is one that points out the same possible object in all possible worlds in which the object exists and can never refer to anything else. An example of a non-rigid designator would be a name—Benjamin Franklin refers to the person Benjamin Franklin, whether he achieved any of his accomplishments or not. What this goes on to mean, is that even in possible worlds where Benjamin Franklin was not the inventor of the bifocal glasses, he was still Benjamin
Franklin. The term non-rigid designator is one that picks out different objects based on properties of their own being which are nonessential to what they are. For example, the phrase “the inventor of bifocal glasses” is a non-rigid designator because in our world
Benjamin Franklin fits this role and has this property, but it is possible to conceive of other worlds where someone else, say George Washington, may have fit this property. In Kripke’s
Naming and Necessity he goes on to prove that identity statements must be necessarily
…show more content…
A premise in Thomas Nagel’s What Is It Like To Be A Bat is that physicalism is not an effective way to explain the mind. Physicalism is the idea that mind is the interior cause of behavior and mental states are biochemical processes in the brain.4 There is a reductionist kind of argument that goes into physicalism that reduces all behavior to corresponding states of the brain. This view makes sense of what we don’t know—how others minds may work—and puts it into terms that we would understand—in terms of our own thought and processes. However, there is a problem with physicalism as a view.
It does not take into account the subjective account of experiences, or qualia, that one goes through and how they differ from person to person (or even from species to species).
Furthermore, physicalism fails to account for qualia by generalizing the experience as linked to a mental state. Nagel goes on to say that physicalist theory cannot be used as an effective explanation for consciousness and the origin of mental states if the underlying theory did not take into account for qualia. This is because the theory attempts to include the subjective character of experience without having included room for it in theory

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The nameless protagonist suffers from this idea of identity as a constant image…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gertler Dualism

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A) Gertler’s “In Defense of Mind- Body Dualism” In this essay, I will be defending Brie Gertler in her dualist stance on the mind – body problem. In the paper, Gertler argues that, “it is possible that pain occurs in a disembodied being.” She starts off talking about this argument by giving the example of stubbing ones toe. She then states that even someone who has had both of their feet amputated can still share this toe stubbing experience.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moreover, as a phenomenally consciousness, Qualia must contain subjective point of view. By contrast, Physical facts are all objective. As a result, we cannot use physical facts to explain the consciousness. The same for the argument “ What is it to be” by Thomas Nagel. Nagel chose bat as the analyzing subjects.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay Of Supervenience

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This has been the problem of the reductive approach: in the case of the mind; for example, Identity theory (Place, 1956, Smart 1959) suggests that the mental is just a process in the brain. This…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Behaviorism fails to explain how people can have the same experience and react differently. Functionalism has attempted to solve this problem by looking into mental processes of these people and refer back to their life experience and bring up. It has also questioned the problem of ‘specifying disposition which constitutes behavior’. Behaviorism is incorrect in stating that a person can fulfill their desire as long as have a desire. Functional theory stands out of the two because it is able to explain the area of physical facts as being mental closed and that mental states are realized in material…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This would only be nonsensical if human beings did not create said labels and share the same experiences. What possible objections to his claim does Wittgenstein foresee and how does he rebut…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personal Identity Concept

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, other theories come into play and reject the psychological approach to explaining personal identity and it’s persistence over time; claims that continuity of the brain and memory are not enough to explain and confirm personal identity are made. These theories include the biological approach, the dualist theory, and the materialist theory. Through the review of these theories respectively, a clearer understanding of personal identity can be developed and argued for. Following this, we can begin to see how cases of multiples personalities or identities can be argued to exist as…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Identity processes are assumed to be universal and unchanging (Breakwell, 1986). However, they do not act on their own – they are guided by underlying principles (Breakwell,…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism vs Materialism The mind/body problem, the question of what is the relationship between the mind and the body, is commonly seen as a key issue in the philosophy of the mind (Sober, 2013, p. 204). The two categories of views discussed in Sober’s ‘Core Questions in Philosophy’ that attempt to resolve the mind/body problem are dualism and materialism. Dualism is the theory that the mind and the brain are two fundamentally different substances (Sober, 2013, p. 204). Conversely, materialism says that matter is the one and only fundamental substance in nature, and the notion that mental phenomena are a result of physical interactions follows (Sober, 2013, p. 204).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Christopher Kettyle Professor Kaspar Philosophy 3000 24 October 2016 Chisholm v Locke Identity Roderick Chisholm's theory and John Locke's theory on identity consists on what their fundamental belief is about identity, while giving examples supporting this idea. Multiple philosophers have explanations about identity but by comparing Chisholm's and Locke's theory you will get a better idea about this metaphysical problem. By doing a comparison this will show you the ideas of these philosophers.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Substance Dualism is a theory of mind that asserts the thesis that there exists the mind (nonphysical) and the body (physical) and that they are two distinct substances. Moreover, it identifies a being immediately with their mind and only secondarily with their body. Logical Behaviorism is branch of philosophical behaviorism. Behaviorism, essentially, is the thesis that mental states, if they exist, are identical to behavioral states. Logical Behaviorism posits that descriptions of mental states are reducible to descriptions of behavioral states.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualism Vs Physicalism

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the forms of physicalism, the theory of behaviorism, is able to disprove that the mind as a non-physical state is separated from the brain of the body. Behaviorism is the theory of how observation behavior is able to be scientifically described without the hypothetical constructs of the mind (Branch of Philosophy). Another theory of physicalism that portrays how the mind is not part of a separate reality is the identity theory. This particular theory showcases the beliefs, pains, desires, though processes, and such matters to be reduced to the states of the brain since these “two entities are identical,” (Lawhead 84). This is strong argument on behalf of physicalism overall given that it allows us to understand that there is no mysterious forces working to develop the matters of the mind.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Intellect:Mind over Matter, Mortimer Adler probes the relationship between the mind and the body. He describes the four main theories regarding this relationship and separates them into two categories: extreme and moderate. Among the four theories, Adler argues in favor of moderate immaterialism. His argument is easily the most convincing as it accounts for the essential difference between man and animal, our intellect, while acknowledging the congruity between the mind and body.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke presupposes that identity exists, and so we cannot use this example as validation of personal identity being down to psychological continuity. Thomas Reid (1710-1796) also rejected Locke’s example, claiming that memory cannot be the basis of personal identity, as it does not logically make sense. The example that Reid used to dispute Locke’s argument was of a boy who was flogged as child and who grew up to become a Solider, then growing up to become an Old General. The Old General remembers being a Solider and the Solider remembers being a boy, but the Old General does not remember being flogged as a boy. According to Locke’s logic therefore, Reid argued that if we are basing personal identity on memories, the Solider and the boy are the same person, as are the Old General and the Solider, but the Old General and boy are not.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    J.C.C. Smart, a founder of Identity Theory, lays out his philosophy in The Topic Neutral Approach. Identity Theory suggests that the mind is created solely by mind states— its singular suggestion being sensations are brain processes. (Smart, 169) (Smart, 170) However, Identity Theorists believe behavior is caused by theoretically understandable mechanical processes. Smart claims this theory should be taken seriously since it parallels physics and therefore seems plausible.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays