As it is noted above, the Constitutional Court is the highest body of the constitutional justice, which provides predominance and a straightforward enforcement of the Constitution in the legal system of Armenia. It has a responsibility to manage the constitutionality of legal regulations and other law making instruments. Thus, its main function is to determine the acceptance of the laws and other legal acts with the Constitution. Moreover, it has a complete authority of the resolutions of the disputes arising from the results of referendum or from the decisions taken with respect to the elections of the Deputies and the President of the Republic of Armenia. To conclude on the existence of grounds for impeaching the President of Republic or on the incapacity by the President to discharge his responsibilities is also under the Constitutional Court’s jurisdiction. Besides, it provides conclusions also for other issues defined by the Constitution. In contrast, the function of the Court of Cassation is to provide the uniform application and development of law, the correct interpretation of legislative provisions. Its activity is generally addressed to contribute to the development of national law by solving civil, criminal and administrative cases and interpreting the laws in its …show more content…
Particularly, the Constitutional Court may adopt decisions and conclusions while realizing its applicable constitutional function. By constant, the Court of Cassation adopts only decisions as a result of reviewing a case. In this regard, the similarity is that the decisions and conclusions of the Constitutional Court should be final and should come into force following the publication thereof, as the decision of the Court of Cassation enters into legal force from the moment of its promulgation; it is final and is not subject to be