Many people turn to guns as a safety blanket, however, with the statistics given it does not seem like guns are helping protect…
Nobody needs guns for protection. If guns would not be allowed to own at home most of the massacres that have occurred till today could have not happened. People are losing their loved ones, school aged children have lost their lives, parents have lost their lives, grandparents have lost their lives. All this is happening because of right to bear arms. Many States have voted not to bear arms but southern states always won because they bring second Amendment in and thinks they have a right to bear arms.…
Though gun control is a necessary thing, many are against stricter gun control laws. Those opposed to stricter gun control laws would state that gun control would have no effect on reducing crime (Gottieb 1991). However, according to the Huffington Post, which states that with “Higher gun violence tend to have much less stringent gun laws” (States 2013). Having gun laws that put severe restrictions on guns are unhelpful and impractical. The government can make it almost impossible to obtain a…
Gun laws are one of the things that won’t get everyone satisfied. Everyone has a different opinion due to either political views or past experience. Some may prefer the idea of gun control or banning guns is the only to stop deaths. According to the National Survey of Law Enforcement, “many proposed gun control measures – including bans on assault weapon – will be ineffective at reducing violent crime and that legal gun ownership by private citizens would prove a better safeguard.” Although having a strict gun control may have it’s benefits when reducing death, we must use gun control moderately to decrease the amount of illegal activity surrounding guns.…
Introduction Gun control has been the center of attention as of late. This topic will split people in two groups: liberals and conservatives. Liberals favor stricter laws on guns and think the everyday citizen should not own one. Conservatives on the other hand think the complete opposite. They think everyone should have a firearm for their protection and the protection of others.…
As of today, there have been 3,269 gun related deaths in the United States and 12,818 gun related incidents. Fifty seven of those incidents were mass shootings, five hundred and forty were home invasions, and three hundred and ninety two were defensive use (Gun Violence Archive). Most guns used in shooting are stolen in some way or another and yet, we still think that taking away the ability to buy them will stop all of the gun violence. Guns are not going away; it is time to arm those able to carry, allow concealed carry on college campuses, and to realize that taking away guns will not stop the mass shootings.…
Gun control can go both ways. Either you completely support guns, or are utterly against them. There is an in between, but that does not really matter in this case, mostly because the in between people most likely do not care. In the many articles that I have read, it seems there are more people for the ban of guns rather than letting them just go around and be easily bought like they are now. I will bring up the pros and cons of having and not having guns.…
Going back to the idea that the government could take away all the firearms from civilians, we have to face the fact that even that would not protect anyone. Instead, it would put many people in danger. The law to take away guns would not affect criminals, because criminals do not follow the law. Without guns for protection, the law-abiding citizens would be helpless to defend themselves against the criminals who would now be the only citizens with guns. The law that was meant to protect would actually lead to the victimization and possible death of law-abiding citizens.…
Amya Vo Ms. Ray Honors Junior English 1/5/16 Thousands of Americans die every year with the use of guns. Therefore, more gun control laws are necessary for the safety of our country. There have been so many examples of how deadly and unpredictable guns and gun owners can be and Americans need to act now to change this. The future and safety of our country is in critical condition because of the lack of stricter gun control laws.…
Firing at Gun Control The 2nd Amendment of the constitution protects the right to bear arms for purposes that include self-defense. But so far over the years, that right has been under attack by our own government. Is seems as though every time you turn on the news, you hear that a man was shot in cold blood, or a man went on a killing spree. But what they do not show are the people whose lives were saved because of gun ownership.…
“of 62 mass shootings in the united states between 1982 and 2012, 49 of the shooters used legally obtained guns. Collectively, 143 guns were possessed by the killers with about 75% obtained legally” procon.org,2016). This says that even if the laws were stricter anyone can use a gun in a harmful way showing it’s not the gun that’s the bad, it’s the person. Many persons also eel that its not the gun control that is needed, it is the gun safety and education that is needed to prevent accidental gun deaths. Many people feel that there is a lot fewer deaths when citizens know the safety behind bearing a gun and the responsibilities that come with that.…
In the United States, there are about 89 firearms for every 100 people. This is almost triple the amount of any other first world country. The amount of homicides by firearm per 100,000 people is also 3.5 times greater than any similar country. There is clearly a strong correlation between the abundance of firearms, and the rate of violent crime. Strengthening gun laws would be a positive step towards decreasing the rate of gun violence.…
There are many reasons gun laws should be stricter and some are unexpected. One unexpected reason is that people rarely use guns in a matter of self-defense. A study showed by the “Violence Policy Center” shows that only 258…
People who report to the National Crime Survey that they defended themselves with a weapon were less likely to lose property in a robbery or be injured in an assault than those who did not defend themselves” (127). What he mentions is that guns are used for self-defense are more often than for crime. Citizens without guns for self-defense, when they encounter robbery or broke in, might increase the crime rate. Therefore, I think that stricter gun control would not make the country safer but deteriorate the safety of the…
In my experience, I have found that guns are very dangerous. They are especially dangerous in the wrong hands. In the last few years there has been a number of accounts where a random civilian had a gun, and they shot innocent people for no reason. Most people think that one person shouldn't ruin it for everyone. On the other hand, I would like to keep in mind that there has been more than one person.…