The purpose of this essay is to research and evaluate the question: In what ways does Shepard Fairey's We the People series and Norman Rockwell's Rosie the Riveter illustration reflect feminist movements in the US during their times? Both artists address the topic of feminism, but in different ways that are influenced by their era. To understand the influences of the artists, as both lived in very different times, it is necessary to explore not only their time, but their lives and artistic styles. Through doing so, an analysis of the selected works can be achieved to thoroughly answer the research question. Although Fairey and Rockwell present dramatically different illustrations, they both reflect the feminist movement in the US during both the early 1940s and 2010s using symbolism, repetition, and juxtaposition. Chapter Two: Background Information- Defining Political and Feminist Art To answer the research question, it is first necessary to understand the types of political art, as well as what defines feminist art to better comprehend the significance of the terms used in evaluation of the pieces. Art is embodied in the world around us, from what we wear to what we watch on TV. Often, we establish within it our own personal meanings and connections. Throughout history, artists have strived to present within their art a symbolic meaning that can be appreciated by the viewer. While some messages may appear abstract, they manifest a personal or cultural meaning that augments various feelings from the audience. Typically, these messages arise from one’s environment, both socially and politically. For instance, Andy Warhol (1928-1987) found his inspiration through pop culture, making the subjects of his work recognizable pieces of modern culture, from Marilyn Monroe (fig. 1) to a Campbell’s soup can (fig. 2). His work created a sense of mystery and esteem about the culture around us (The Andy Warhol Foundation). Like Warhol, other artists aim to make a statement about something within our lives, something everyone can connect to in some way. …show more content…
Most times, what can be classified as a political piece often does not appear to uphold the common belief of what political art is. Political art is quite difficult to define because it ranges from pieces that are obviously political to those subtler in message (Croiheain). Political art is associated with an image that challenges or supports the status quo and is described as art that is “doing something” by addressing social or political issues (Tate). Its message usually is intended to empower individuals and communities, but is also open for various interpretations (Tate). The term “political art” can be divided into three different categories, according to Irish artist, Caoimhghin Ó Croidheáin. The first type is portrayal, which is art that exemplifies the idea that “this would happen if this happens now or has happened in the past” (Croiheain). Like the term suggests, this form of art tends to describe situations that people find themselves in, which can cause for multiple perspectives (Croiheain). For example, in art depicting 19th century slavery, one can find that two perspectives arise from one illustration: how a slave should be treated or the horrid treatment of slaves (fig. 3). With open interpretation, both sides have value. The second type is promotion, which highlights the means and ways towards the resolution of a problem (Croiheain). It also concentrates on