Robespierre Despotacy In The French Revolution

Improved Essays
Modern History Essay Draft
Comte de Mirabeau claimed that “In time of anarchy one may seem a despot in order to be a saviour.” This is evident in the French Revolution, specifically the Terror (1793-1794), which was a period of anarchy in France. A despot refers to government which holds all the power and uses it in an oppressive and tyrannical way. The revolutionary leader Maximilien Robespierre seemed despotic during the Terror, through several of his actions such as; his exploitation of fear, his de-Christianisation of France and his organized execution of ‘enemies of the revolution.’ Robespierre intended to provide stability in France, nevertheless the subsequent actions proved to be counterproductive to the revolution.
Prior to the Terror,
…show more content…
Robespierre grew increasingly paranoid, which led to the Committee sanctioning laws that were aimed against alleged enemies. In September 1793, the Convention passed the ‘Law of Suspects’ which deemed those who “have not constantly demonstrated their devotion to the Revolution” (Duvergier J.B 1793), as suspects who could be arrested and executed. This law allowed the Committee to abuse their power and arrest anybody they wanted to ensure the ‘safety’ of France, highlighting Robespierre’s exploitation of power. Shortly, the ‘Law of 22 Prairial’ was passed by the Committee, and effectively removed the rights of accused persons. Robespierre would not allow anything to defer the completion of the revolution, this is especially evident during the Wars of the Vendée, in which the Vendée rebelled against the injustices of the revolution. The Committee originally hoped for a pacification, nevertheless when faced with resistance they decided “that a severe and swift example” needed to be set (Buchez, B 1793), meaning the city of Vendee had to be subdued using violence, this is behaviour is reminiscent of other dictators like Hitler and Stalin, (Kekes J 2006; Piedro A 2018). This illustrates Robespierre’s tyrannical behaviour to achieve his goal. Other revolutionary leaders like Georges Dante, who initially supported Robespierre began to question the terror and the justification, which led to his execution. Dantes’ only crime was opposing Robespierre, which demonstrates the oppressive society which Robespierre created. The Laws that the Committee created pertained to different things including; the economy, the church and conscription. These laws were strict, oppressive and carried the harsh punishment of death if broken. These laws were detrimental to France and created an

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Terror was not simply the moment at which the French government unleashed its violence against its own people. The Terror, as it was seen during the Revolution itself, was rather a way by which one chose to think; it was, in essence, a rejection of monarchy and a willingness to proclaim full separation from the former rulers of the nation. This notion was perceived as an effort to intimidate the upper classes to enforce a new ideological era, not simply to employ physical violence against suspicious individuals. When Robespierre famously proclaimed that virtue and terror needed to be combined during the French Revolution, his message was not intended to be a justification of outright cruelty, but instead a compelling commentary on precisely how intimidation needed be used to threaten the royalist ideology. Indeed, while this was the valid historical use of the term, many abused its connotations and took it upon themselves to officiate a barbarous corporeal war against the French Republic’s supposed…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robespierre believed that terror was a necessary evil, to obtain “liberty and equality.” The Terror had an economic side represented in the Maximum, a price-control measure demanded by the lower classes of Paris, and a religious side that was represented in the program of de-Christianization pursued by the followers of Jacques Hebert. Robespierre believed that without terror there was no justice and without virtue, there is no terror, and without terror there is no power. His powerful speech only confused the hungry citizens. Robespierre went to extreme measures to control political activity in France.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many citizens did not want to give up the monarchy French had. Other citizens rebelled against the “levee en masse”, a military draft in Vendee (Doc C). On top of the forced draft, the government also tried to abolish Christianity, upsetting French citizens even more (Doc C). These events caused the citizens to revolt against the local government (Doc A). Even though many citizens were against the revolution, they were innocent and did not deserve the Terror against them.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After the execution of King Louis XVI, the national assembly appointed a 12 man Committee of Public Safety to run France. Maximilien Robespierre, a great orator dominated the committee and led the army to protect the nations borders. To defend from internal enemies, he enacted the Reign of Terror. During the year 1973-1974, anyone suspected of aiding the enemy was swiftly put on trial and sent to the guillotine. Terror became the order of the day, as Robespierre stated, “Softness to traitors will destroy us all.”…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Jacobins were violent and militant, the most radical faction in the National Assembly compared to the Girondins who preferred a monarchical leadership. The firebrand Jacobins had their way and Maximilien Robespierre took over the leadership. He would later be executed for the murder of 15,000 people. Any dissident voice was considered a confession to anti-revolt and therefore a candidate for execution. ‘Virtue without terror,’ Robespierre recorded, is ‘fatal’ (Robespierre, n.p).…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Additionally, Camille Desmoulins, a French journalist, wrote a series of questions to Robespierre asking “the stragglers of the revolution whom you imprison, are [they] really dangerous?”(Doc. 3). This questioning of the terror shows that people who were not really dangerous had their basic human rights taken away and were imprisoned without real reason or a chance to defend themselves. Desmoulins may be biassed in his questioning because as a former ally of Robespierre, he may be motivated by a personal vendetta, but this question is still valid and must be taken into consideration. Many of the people imprisoned during the reign of terror had committed no real…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Robespierre led the Committee of Public of Safety. Here he rose to power that gave him the ability to take control. This new found leadership caused what is known as…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eventually, Maximilien Robespierre dominated this committee and executed anyone who opposed the French revolution. Robespierre, after only about a year of power, would then be executed himself…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ali McCowin Mr. Picazo History, Per. 5 6 January 2016 Was the Reign of Terror Justified? The Reign of Terror was a significant time in the French Revolution impacting the nation and killing many individuals. The Reign of Terror lasted less than two years. During that time, the Revolution was in extreme debt, due to wars.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “To punish the oppressors of humanity is clemency; to forgive them is barbarity ,” is a quote by Robespierre during his time in power within the Committee of General Security. Robespierre believed it was upon the population to act on the means of attainment of reign of the constitutional laws. His speech explores the influence of society upon the fundamental principle of the democratic or popular government. The failure by the population was not seen favourable by Robespierre and resulted in the adoption of the Committee of General Security managing the internal policy of the country. “…But when the people itself is corrupted, liberty is already lost,” reflects the attitude of the people within the context of the Industrial Revolution, when Terror was lawfully inaugurated as a policy on September 5th, 1793.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Time of Misery The Reign of Terror was a crucial time during the French Revolution that negatively affected the lives of many. This horrifying period during the French Revolution all began in the year 1792 when former King Louis XVI was executed for treason. The following year, Maximilien Robespierre took control of France through the Committee of Public Safety. From that point on, the country of France went into a time of mourning and brought great suffering among millions.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As the Revolution gained more power, its leaders became more paranoid. In 1793, Maximilien Robespierre, who had assumed most of the power in France, declared that a reign of terror would begin. During this period of time, the French government’s first priority was keeping the Revolution safe from people who wanted…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    One comparable result of these revolutions were the execution programs that emerged from them. In France, a program called the Reign of Terror, led by Maximilen Robespierre, had started. The purpose of this program was to institute a policy of fear or terror in those who dared to counter revolt. Although this began as a period of trials against those who seemed to oppose the revolution, it quickly altered into morbid confrontations where those accused were not allowed to defend themselves. Many were killed through the use of guillotine, an execution method of beheading.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robespierre spoke on February 5, 1794 to inspire the crowds of the revolution to eliminate the internal threats, which included spies and anyone who spoke of counter revolutionary thoughts. Robespierre expressed the idea that royalists were not enemies, but simply strangers that needed to be stopped for the safety of everyone. He also speaks of the peaceful times that will come after this happens and after the revolution is over (Doc G). The translation of Robespierre’s speech waters down to by eliminating the spies and royalists, the public would be safer and all threats against the revolution would be abolished inside of France. Unfortunately, Robespierre was too driven by power and fear, he was executed for using his power the wrong way.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though Robespierre killed thousands of people, he believed he did it for the sake of the people to form a new government. As he stated, “Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible; it is therefore an emanation of virtue; it is not so much a special principle as it is a consequence of the general principle of democracy applied to our country 's most urgent needs” (Terror and Virtue Letter). The Reign of Terror ended when the citizens put Robespierre on trial and executed him in 1794. Even with many deaths, fears, and changes…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays