The plaintiffs side challenged the 180-day school year rule under the violation of equal protection, under the fourteenth amendment, and, as I mentioned previously, the Education for all Handicapped Children Act, too1. This side, also, made the point that the Department of Education requires at least one annual IEP per child1. An IEP includes the current levels of the child and, the goals they hope to obtain within that years’ time1. However, districts refused to fund more than the 180 days, even though it is an annual, aka one years’ time, goal(s) to achieve list1. On the other side of this debate are the defendants, who claim that the loss of skills are due to the nonfunctionality of what is being taught to the children, a lack of competence in teachers and, that parents are failing to practice the program properly with their children1.…