More than half of participants 68% had access to (WWW), most of them 59.73% had this access at home. And 56% of participants read medical journals, but only 2.01% read these journals regularly.
Most of family physicians were unaware of most EBM resources, and only 31.33% were aware but not use journals of FM, but 19.33% read Pub Med and only 15.33% used Pub Med in clinical decision making.
Barriers mentioned by the participants that interfere with their using of EBM these barriers had the following order as most of physicians 82.67% reported patient overload, followed by …show more content…
BMJ Publishing Group.
The Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews
http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane/revabstr
/main index.htm Arguably the most extensive collection of systematic reviews. The Cochrane Collaboration
DynaMed
http://www.dynamicmedical.com A database of summaries of the evidence drawn from sources such as Clinical Evidence and the Cochrane Library. DynaMed
FIRSTConsult
http://www.firstconsult.com
(formerly PDxMD) A database of evidence summaries drawn from Cochrane, Clinical Evidence, the National Guideline Clearinghouse and others. Elsevier
InfoRetriever http://www.infopoems.com A search engine with access to evidence-based sources such as POEMs, Cochrane, clinical rules, a diagnostic test database, practice InfoPOEMs Inc.
guideline summaries and Griffith's Five-Minute Clinical Consult; subscribers also receive Daily POEMs via e-mail.
SUMSearch http://sumsearch.uthscsa.edu/ A search engine that gathers evidence based clinical information from MEDLINE, DARE and the National Guideline Clearinghouse. The University of Texas Health Science