Plato's Theory Of Knowledge Essay

Improved Essays
In today’s society, many individual’s have their own theory of knowledge. In the Webster dictionary, knowledge is defined as the state of being aware of something. As we begin to discuss what knowledge truly is, we will be focusing on these two philosophers’ and their theories of knowledge: Descartes and Plato. After reading and analyzing both “Meditations”, by Descartes and “The Republic” and “The Apology” by Plato, I recognized that both philosophers agreed on some things, but at the same time had different views on other things. In “Mediations”, Descartes states “I first realized how numerous were the false opinions that in my youth I had taken to be true, and thus how doubtful were all those that I had subsequently built upon them” (1st Med. Pg.13). Descartes doubts basically everything that he has been taught to believe in because it is natural to believe what is false. Descartes goes on to say that our senses can be deceptive and that when he believes in something he usually relies on his senses. “I have noticed that the senses are sometimes deceptive; and it is a mark of prudence Gouveia 2 never to place our complete trust in those who have deceived us even one” (1st Med. Pg.14). Descartes states “Although even these general things-eyes, head, hands and the like-could be imaginary.” He believes that his entire life could just be a dream and that he is possibly being deceived into thinking that his life is actually authentic. Many of us grow up with beliefs that we think are real and Descartes does believe that we cannot just give up on certain beliefs because there are a part of us. Descartes goes on to say that, “namely there is a God who is able to do anything and by whom I, such as I am, have been created.” Descartes must be real because if he doubts things, he is in the act of deceiving which requires him to think and use his knowledge. He says, “I did exist, if I persuaded myself of something” (2cd Med. Pg. 18). Overall, what Descartes tries to explain is that what you know to be …show more content…
“What is entirely, is entirely knowable; and what in no way is, is in every way unknowable” (477a). Plato believes that everything else besides certainty of knowledge must be deceitful. With this, Plato believed that the most important concept of knowledge was good itself and that knowledge is based on the good alone. As we go more into depth about good, he compares the strength of the sun to the strength of good. He explains that we can examine the sun with our eyes, but when it comes to the good, we use our minds instead of our eyes which allow us to fully comprehend something. Basically Plato believes that the outcome of the good is …show more content…
Both Descartes and Plato believed that everything else besides certainty of knowledge is false. Descartes began to doubt everything he believed in and learned growing up because he was uncertain so he began to reconstruct his knowledge on only things that were certain beginning with himself. Plato is different because he doesn’t agree with doubting beliefs, but instead he tries to broaden the knowledge of one’s belief in something they think they have full knowledge of. Both Plato and Descartes try to find the true good and what the good truly is, but possess contrasting methods of searching for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Traceel Andrews Paper # 3 Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? – Edmund Gettier Gettier paper argued that for a thought to be considered justified there needs to be a necessary condition and that a third condition needs to be introduced for S to believe namely Q. Gettier talks about three other philosophers ideals and states that their ideas are wrong. Plato’s Theaetetus and Meno In Theaetetus, Plato through Socrates fumble with what knowledge is.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He says, “ If we do not understand our tools, then there is danger that we will become the tool of our tools ( pg 69).” Here Plato makes its evident that if we do not take advantage of the knowledge and tools that are at our fingertips then we are fools. He is basically saying that what is the point of having all of this knowledge at our disposal if we don’t care to understand where it comes and how to make use of…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle once said “Each man judges well the things that he knows, and of these he is the best judge. Thus the man who had been educated in a certain area is the best judge in that area, while the man who has a general education is a good judge in general.” The quote states how an individual is able to effectively judge the things that they know the best. Someone who has been educated in a certain area is the best judge for that area. The nature of the quote is taking what you know to make a choice and come up with your own conclusions and opinions.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He decides to dump everything he thought was true and start over. Everything he admits has the least bit of doubt should be declared as completely false. If there is someone who instills thoughts in him, who thought of someone instilling thoughts in him? He wonders if he is the author of these thoughts. Descartes also persuaded himself there was nothing in the world, including the sky, the earth, minds, bodies, and even…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Meditations takes us on an intellectual, meditative, spiritual journey inward, questioning what exactly, if anything at all, we can know with certainty. Descartes was active in physics and mathematics, as he was interested in the potential of science to give us the truth about the world. Descartes believed that knowledge has secure foundations and and that all other knowledge rests upon these foundations. Hence, in order to establish what is “firm and constant in the sciences”, it is necessary to establish the very foundations of all knowledge so that he could use these principles to base the reasoning process upon. For Descartes, this meant removing all sensory prejudice.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believed that all we can know is information that we are certain of. Knowledge with any amount of skepticism, according to Descartes, proves to be unreliable and thus, not real knowledge. Therefore, he further stated that the knowledge obtained through the senses is not real knowledge because the senses can be deceiving and biased to individuals. Descartes even is skeptical of concepts such as math because he believed that one is just told that two plus three is five, but one cannot be certain. According to Descartes, an "evil genius of the utmost power and cunning has employed all his energies in order to deceive me."…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes is known for doubting physical objects and people around him. He argues anything that can be doubted should be treated as false. The term knowledge to Descartes means an event or occurrence that is true. Knowledge requires certainty, and without that certainty, it cannot exist. Descartes’ dream hypothesis and evil demon hypothesis show that anything in our world can be fabricated.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ‘Clearly and Distinctly’ rule is the view that ‘everything that I perceive very clearly and distinctly is true.’ However, we must first begin by defining these key terms. By ‘clearly’ Descartes describes it as ‘present and accessible to the attentive mind’ and ‘distinctly’ is ‘so sharply separated from all other perceptions that it contains within itself only what is clear.’ In this essay, I will closely analyse how Descartes arrived to this rule of perception and will argue that he was not incredibly successful in using it to rebuild all knowledge.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Vs Judeo

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His works resonate with critiques of democracy and the pursuit of justice. His thoughts and teachings are deeply embedded with a singular question of what does it mean to be good? Often using his mentor and teacher, Socrates as the main character and focal point of his dialogues, Plato’s writings burn with the desire of a man trying to reconcile ‘right and…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Out of all abstract thought, no idea surpasses “good” in the mind of this ancient Greek, and all other things, even knowledge and truth, are under it (Republic, Book VI, 508e). Indeed, all things must be under it, as “good” is beyond and superior to the state of “being” (Republic, Book VI, 509b). Interestingly, this view shows how it is this moral framework, and not the gods, that Plato reveres as the ultimate authority and basis of reality: If “good” is beyond “being,” but the gods certainly “are,” then “good” is above any Greek god. Indeed, pursuing the favor of the gods does not seem to be of any real priority to Plato, but rather seeking things such as truth, justice, and knowledge, all which stem from “good” (Republic, Book VI,…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Something which can be difficult to distinguish when reading the Meditations is whether Descartes is talking about truth in its purest sense or reality. In the second meditation, he argues that when looking to establish truth we need to accept that we exist otherwise we cannot judge the truth in anything else. But this can be confusing as he is relating truth and reality and equalling them to each other. If Descartes here, is referring to the idea of reality he is arguing that for us to judge the reality of anything else, we must admit that through our ability to think for ourselves and rationalise, we must be real. However, if he is referring to truth, then he is using the truth of our own thoughts to rationalise the truth of all else.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes associates as an Early Modern Thinker as he obtains opposing views from the Medieval Period. Descartes believes that the Medieval Period thinkers suffer corruption because of their theocentric views and negligence regarding advancing knowledge, as the medieval thinkers practice exegesis. Descartes concludes that an intellectual revolution is necessary in order to completely break with the corrupt past in order to gain new knowledge and truths. In order to achieve new truths and most certain knowledge, Descartes yearns for indubitably, the inability to doubt claims.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics