Ted Chiang's 'Story Of Your Life'

Improved Essays
Peer Response Questions

Overview Questions:
1) He uses "Story of Your Life" by Ted Chiang to analyze the idea of "Free Will".

2) The author analyzes the genre, context, and message.
Genre: Science fictions contribution towards the idea of free will.
Context: Provides different events where humans act belligerently, knowing the potential repercussions. Message: Analyzes the authors message, which is humans act upon free will.
Audience: N/A
3) Thesis: Human Action is not dominated by our cognition but our free will.

- Main Point of First Paragraph: He focuses on the idea of free will. Also, he provides examples that support his topic sentence; such as, the U.S and Russia's decision to continue to create nuclear defenses, knowing the
…show more content…
To some degree, it does flow; however, in my opinion, you can elaborate a bit more on your analysis. For example, mention the effects it has towards the audience. On top of that, I would advise you to utilize quotes from the book to support your claims. Overall, great work! Introduction/Thesis Statement 4) The introduction provides a sufficient amount of context of the book and immediately asserts his argument. Aside from the purpose, in my opinion, I would mention the short story's intended audience. Lastly, I was bit confused of your usage of "cognition".

5) In the short story "Story of my Life", Chiang utilizes Dr. Bank's actions to communicate the human nature of free will. a) Yes, it mentions how the main character's actions conveys a message of free will. However, it does not mention how it affects the audience. b) The thesis has a focus on the character's action and its contribution towards the authors primary message. c) The language is clear and readable.

Body Paragraphs
6) For most of his body paragraphs, he occasionally lacks a topic sentence. He starts them off with a quote; however, I would generally start with the main idea of the paragraph and follow it up with a quote. Nevertheless, his body paragraphs all focus on the idea of free

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On the story “so I ain’t no good girl” by Sharon Flake, the main character is a young black female that attends high school. She is one of the main protagonists of the story. This character is either hated or loved by certain audiences due to her actions or background information. I will discuss about this character later in the story and our thesis is “did the author, Sharon, explain the characteristics of the protagonist?”…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part 1: The Hearth and the Salamander 1. As the story opens, what are the forces acting upon the protagonist, Montag, and what other forces help Montag in the recognition of his dilemma? One of the forces acting upon Montag as the story opens is his job.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the following, I will argue that people act upon their own free will and not through determinism, and disprove the third and fourth components of Strawson’s initial Basic Argument. Determinism is defined as the theory that everything that happens is determined to happen exactly as it does by what has happened before. Essentially, this means that every choice that a person makes they have not actually made- their choice was determined for them long ago and they are acting how they believe they chose to act. This is similar to the Christian belief of predestination, which is defined as the foreordaining of all that will happen in the future. The principal difference between determinism and predestination is that the concept of predestination…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Response to McCloskey’s Article Shamyra Thompson Liberty University Introduction In the short article On Being an Atheist, H.J. McCloskey discusses several arguments pertaining to the whether or no there is a God and what one believes to be evil. McCloskey also refers to the arguments as “proof” as well as implied several times that they can’t define or establish the existence of God. In the light of Foreman’s comments in regards to the question of God’s existence, I felt that he addressed the question by discussing the commonly asked question “Is there a God or if a God exist”. He also discussed what exactly is evil.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ariely Critical Analysis

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Questions on Meaning 1. What do you take to be Ariely's reason for writing the essay? Is he merely reporting the results of his research or does he have another PURPOSE in mind? Ariely's reason for writing this essay is to give an idea of how dishonesty the society is and to give a general idea on how people cheat in many circumstances.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It has been said that what we value can be determined only by what we sacrifice. This applies to several characters in Barbara Kingsolver’s The Poisonwood Bible, especially Orleanna, Nathan, and their daughters. Through their sacrifices, characteristics and values become evident in these characters that would not be understood otherwise. The sacrifices made by these characters contribute to the novel as a whole by giving it depth and greater meaning, just as these sacrifices make each character’s intentions clear and presence throughout the novel more relevant. Orleanna made countless sacrifices throughout the novel for her husband.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    God’s freedom, god is free, it is believed that God does all great and can’t do any evil. God can act in conformity with his choices, choices are made by his own nature. Walter Stace makes an argument that we have free will or we don’t have free will, is a verbal dispute. Stace thinks if we argue about free will, then we will bring a closer define, definition of what free will is.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within this essay, I will argue that Galen Strawson’s basic argument, presented in Your Move: The Maze of Free Will, is correct about the impossibility of ultimate moral responsibility. I will do this by first explaining the basic argument as proposed by Strawson, then raising an objection to it concerning the distinction between the self and the way you are by denying the second premise. And finally, I will be refuting the objection. Strawson’s basic argument can be boiled down to the simple notion that one cannot be ultimately morally responsible. He claims that anything you do in any circumstance is an effect of who you are, and the way you are.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scott Russell Sanders's Staying Put: Making a Home in a Restless World gives an alternative view on migration. Sanders strengthens his essay and ideas by using Aristotle's appeals to connect to his readers. He further strengthens his essay by acknowledging the validity and faults of Rushdie's claim. Sanders wrote the essay to change Americans' current perspective on migration as well as to discredit Rushdie's idea. From the start, Sanders writes with Aristotle's appeals in mind.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Information 1. First person point-of-view 2. Mia, Adam, Mom, Dad, and Teddy 3. I liked this book because its whole conflict was around something totally different then what most authors would have chosen. It leaves you confused about what Mia might choose and gives points from both options.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discussing Kane and Self Forming Actions This essay looks to discuss Kane’s self-forming actions, or SFAs, and looks to see if they are successful in defending a libertarian conception of free will. First essay will explain what SFAs are. Next, the essay challenges the validity of SFAs on the grounds that Kane`s account of freedom lacks a proper external story. It finds this to be true, and concludes that SFAs cannot then save libertarianism as they are not valid.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also leads to consequences of rash decisions at crucial times, making this the central idea of “A Brief Encounter with The…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction I. In this paper, I will be arguing for the following claim that we, human beings are not predetermined beings, but rather we have free will. It has long been argued that people are not free and do not have free will; that rather than having free will we live in a world that is predetermined. That our choices and actions are reflections of and happen because of a long line of other choices and action that caused the present, and thus we have a fixed future. This is just not the case.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Free Will Vs. Determinism

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A large and important topic in philosophy is the idea of what us, as humans, are in control of throughout our lives. Are we in control of every moment in our life, or is our life completely mapped out for us. This question leads us to two critical terms used by philosophers, free will and determinism. I will analyze these two theories and discuss different viewpoints that philosophers have regarding free will and determinism. I will explain how they interact with one another in an attempt to confirm my belief that yes, we have free will even if determinism is true.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays