The Influence Of Normanization

Great Essays
The Norman rulers of the 11th and 12th centuries were able to achieve and maintain prominence in the areas of Italy and Sicily through military prowess, exceptional political manoeuvring and intermarriage. This is shown through the sources from this time period which allow historians to examine the narrative the sources present, the character of the rulers and the interactions they have with other peoples at the time.
Southern Italy and Sicily served as the intersection of Greek, Latin, Jewish and Muslim cultures. According to Emily Albu, this created a rich mixture of intellectual sophistication and material wealth which first attracted Norman soldiers and arrived in what is described as a ‘piecemeal’ fashion. They are recorded as having
…show more content…
Due to the small numbers arriving, they could not do a full-scale ‘Normanisation’ as William the Conqueror had done in England between 1066 and 1086. In contrast to the twenty year ‘Normanisation’ of England, Italy and Sicily took 91 years (1000ish to 1091). Before Normans began to migrate to Italy, conflict existed between the local peoples of Southern Italy. These clashes were between local princes over boundaries and principals, against native Italian tribes and threats from the Byzantine and German empires. These warring factions use Normans as mercenaries in their battles. Normans first cemented their involvement and supremacy in warfare in the Italian peninsula by being involved in clashes between the Lombards and the Byzantine Empire. The Normans fought on both sides of the conflict, with their loyalties with whoever paid more. Emily Albu says that the Normans were the only ones who won from this arrangement. It is in this conflict and the others like it that the Norman people earned their reputation for military might, with Geoffrey Malterra describing them as the quintessential warriors. Norman identity in Normandy was entrenched in military success, …show more content…
Charter evidence shows that Lombards and Normans were clearly defined as separate races or ethnicities. Charles Homer Haskins suggests the Normans lost their identity ‘in the general mass’. Rather than asserting their distinct Norman identity, they enforced their likenesses and connections with local populations to secure a stable ruler-ship over the land. However, this adaptation to their environment is characteristic to the Norman identity. It has already been established by the writers of the time that the Normans, and especially the sons of Tancred, had the ‘inborn trait’ of domination and the cunning to do whatever was needed to achieve this. Political manoeuvring and intermarriage was another extreme that Guiscard and Roger used to achieve their goals. While it may have seemed like they were succumbing to a new culture - Roger II’s reign shows a large impact of Arab-Muslim culture: his mantle had Arab inscriptions - they were continuing their quest for total

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The difference between vassal and lord shows the ranking of power, and the foundation for feudal relationships of medieval history. Idealised views of feudalism represent honorable agreements between a lord and his vassal or vassals in which they both offered their loyalties to one another in exchange for land and services that were usually military in nature. Instead the Agreement between Count William V of Aquitaine and Hugh IV of Lusignan translated by Paul Hyams of Cornell University, demonstrates the tumultuous relationships between vassal and lord for the struggle of having and maintain power and authority. This literary account shows the conflict that formed between Hugh and William. The text depicts the kinds of relationships that had…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay Question #2 Melanie A Morway October 6, 2016 The way that our text book describes Charlemagne and the way that the selection from Einhard describes Charlemagne are different in several ways, yet there are some similarities. Our text book describes him as a man that was instrumental in implementing the practices of a Feudal society in Europe. “Perhaps the most important ruler to codify and adopt these practice was Charlemagne, who dreamed not only of unifying Europe under his rule, but also unifying Church and state in a single administrative and political bureaucracy”(Sayre, pg 82). Our text book goes on the discuss Charlemagne’s accomplishments. Einhard’s writing takes a more personal turn, and describes not only his personal and private life, but also describes his looks.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Maalouf gives the example of Saladin, who conquered the Crusaders and took the Holy City. Unlike the Franj leadership, Saladin never killed soldiers he captured. Instead, he asked for ransom for him to release them, an act that shows how merciful the Arab leadership was. This is also an evidence that Crusader leadership did not care about peace. Saladin acted in kind in order to avoid further bloodshed.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty and Rome may seem like they have nothing in common, but what happens when these two giant empires are compared? While the specifics of the history of the Roman Empire and Han Dynasty are different, there are some similarities in the creation, maintenance, culture and decline of these two empires. The best way to compare these two empires is to start with their origins. The Han Dynasty and Romans both achieved massive success during their reigns, but their origins show the magnitude of their rise.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book Two Lives of Charlemagne contains two different biographies of Charles the great or “Charlemagne”, who was king of Franks from 771-814 A.D. The first biography is titled “The Life Of Charlemagne” and is written by Einhard. The second biography is titled “Charlemagne” and is authored by Notker the Stammerer. Both biographies of Charlemagne are classical medieval literature, but they differ in their points of view and focus. Einhard mostly talked about the actual life of Charlemagne, the key political decisions, wars he was in, and the projects he’d been working on to help improve the society in his kingdom. Walahfrid Strabo states that “Einhard was one of the most highly thought of among all the palace officials of that time, not…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Watts states that one of the most fundamental political ideas of the middle ages was the concept of the Roman Empire. Although the ancient empire of Rome was long past its glory, Watts maintains that “it had suited almost every succeeding regime across the Mediterranean and beyond to adopt some at least of what it understood to be the rights, rituals and accoutrements of imperial power, and to insist on some kind of continuity with the Roman imperial tradition”. Rome, as a concept and an idea, was the bedrock of almost every formal political structure in medieval Europe. The Holy Roman Empire was arguably the epitome of this political practice.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bayeux Tapestry tells the story, in pictures, of the events leading up to and including the Battle of Hastings on October 14, 1066. The story is told from the Norman point of view. There is no English so it is very challenging to confirm or dispute some of the information on the tapestry. It is called the Bayeux Tapestry because it has been kept at Bayeux in France ever since it was made. William's half-brother Odo (Bishop of Bayeux) ordered a tapestry to be made in honor of William's victory at the Battle of Hastings.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Religion influenced cultural development in Medieval Europe, because as it was being spread through trade and ways along those lines, it changed the culture dramatically. Since there were conflicts between Christians and Muslims, it created a walls between then socially, therefore creating an uncomfortable mood for most of Europe. This made undecided people begin to chooses sides, as Christians and Muslims fought. Even though this happened, it helped to develop the culture of Medieval…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He subdued and reigned over his enemies all throughout modern day France and well into the neighboring lands that would become Spain, Italy and Germany. This titan of ancient times is often remembered only by his conquests, but the accounts of Einhart and Notker show him in much more depth and color, leaving the readers with a well fleshed out, multifaceted mental image of the man behind the conquest. To define Charlemagne by his trials helps present him in stark terms. He was a man of staunch faith who worked hard for its propagation. In contrast to his love of Christianity, Charles’ apparent self-adulation provides a new dimension showing a seeming contradiction of what was, at once, a godly man and a king driven by his love of self.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    a) Briefly explain, with reference to TWO of the factors listed below, how there came together in Europe in the early 16th century both the motivation and the means to explore and colonize land across the seas. Religion conflicts arose between the Protestants and the Catholics. The Catholics of Spain and Portugal, along with the Protestants of England and Holland, acquired a desire to spread their versions of Christianity to other people as a result of religious rivalries. Religion also provided the means for exploration. The monarchs in Spain were Catholic.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Mongols caused death and destruction to whatever came its way. These Barbarians captured land and killed everything in sight in the 13th century. Barbarians is a word to describe a negative meaning, referring to people who were savage and evil. This meaning is what the Mongols portrayed through their actions of mass destruction.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The wars were both over Sicily, both between the Romans and the Carthaginians, and the Romans won both wars. As I said earlier, Sicily was a very strong economical province. They produced wheat, grapes, olive oil, etc. This and the fact that Rome was gaining power of the Mediterranean caused both wars to occur in Sicily. With Romans elite power, they were able to win both of the wars continuing the quest to become stronger.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The renaissance is renowned to be a popular cultural movement in Europe. Conversely the success of the popular Renaissance would not be as we know it if weren’t for outside influences and contributions made before, and during that time period. The revival or “rebirth” of the era did not only occur within Europe, but other parts of the world were also thriving and flourishing. This essay reasons for Renaissance as a global phenomenon, where during an equivalent time period other nations flowered in innovation and through cultural movements, whilst also committing towards Europe Renaissance and human endeavour as a whole. Paving the Way…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Einhard composes Life of Charlemagne in 825 AD with the intention of commemorating King Charles’s well rounded devotion to his kingdom and his family, as he went beyond the expected duties of a King. Throughout the course of his life, Einhard had became very fond of the King and felt it his responsibility to preserve his knowledge of the King’s great deeds subsequent to the King’s death. Einhard provides a detailed piece of writing in which he eternalizes the deeds enacted by the King through which the King’s devotion, to both his kingdom and his family, is reflected. First, Einhard provides some detail about rulers who came before King Charles. In doing so, he provides the reader the opportunity to create a comparison in which King Charles…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why the Crusades were started Crusades began as a series of some religious wars which the Latin Church sanctioned between the periods of 11th to 16th centuries. The aim of coming up with crusades was to save Jerusalem from the Islamic rule at that time. As much as crusades were for advancing the cause of Christ, they began as a way to free the Christians from the Islamic rule and force. This research paper explains all the crusades that started in Europe and determines if the crusades signify Christian worldviews.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays