In Story One and Two, they both use connotative language to produce feeling, such as “vivid ” and “glistening” and “. . .blasted with its glare…” (Story One) This adds emphasis, and texture to the writing, so again, we can understand and feel what the author wants us to feel. In Story Two, she uses scientific language, along with connotative. “. . .precipitous decline accross its historical range…” This particular wording, adds a dramatic tension, and highlights its importance. While in Story Three, the author uses words such as “tired and sick…” to describe how he's feeling. But then he describes the scenery as “mystical” and “perfect” to show how he feels about the nature around
In Story One and Two, they both use connotative language to produce feeling, such as “vivid ” and “glistening” and “. . .blasted with its glare…” (Story One) This adds emphasis, and texture to the writing, so again, we can understand and feel what the author wants us to feel. In Story Two, she uses scientific language, along with connotative. “. . .precipitous decline accross its historical range…” This particular wording, adds a dramatic tension, and highlights its importance. While in Story Three, the author uses words such as “tired and sick…” to describe how he's feeling. But then he describes the scenery as “mystical” and “perfect” to show how he feels about the nature around