Moral Responsibility In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

Improved Essays
Moral Responsibility In book III of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he develops and discusses his theory on responsibility in relation to human actions and character. Aristotle states that as mature beings we are held accountable for our voluntary actions; but he also expresses that children and animals perform voluntary actions as well. In the following paper, I will focus on the actions and passions for which we are held responsible for, as well as those from which we are excused from. The first forms of action that Aristotle discusses are voluntary and involuntary action. When the principle of an action is out of a person’s control, the action is performed by force. Thus, Aristotle states: “if a wind carried someone away, we could say that what happened …show more content…
Therefore I should be the blame and held responsible for the child’s death.
Aristotle also states that an action is also considered involuntary when although the cause is internal, the action comes about by ignorance. He claims that we should be able to distinguish actions done in ignorance, and actions caused by ignorance. An action is considered to be “caused by ignorance” if the person who is performing the action is not aware of what they are doing, who or what they are affecting, or what the consequences are of their actions are. After understanding Aristotle’s views and theory on this particular segment, I conclude that Actions caused by ignorance are actions which we are not responsible for. This makes me revert to thoughts of religion. For example, Christians believe that reading the Bible is a crucial aspect in going to Heaven and understanding God; but If I live in Africa, and have never learned to read and I practice a cultural/tribal religion because that is all I was ever taught, then how can I be held accountable or condemned

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Paul Roche’s The Great Encounter, a foreword in The Oedipus Plays of Sophocles lays out truths about human life, both as a single entity and as a component of a much larger universe interconnecting each and everyone one of us. Throughout the piece are scattered ‘general truths’ that serve to summarize aspects of human morality and accomplishment and detail the limits of one’s intellectual self, some of which I can assent to and others which I do not completely agree with. To begin, Roche declares that, “though we may be innocent, we are all potentially guilty, because of the germ of self-sufficiency and arrogance in our nature” (Roche ix), an assertion which I definitely agree with, for it is in human nature to act in the favor of one’s self-interest.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle decided to take on the subject of the good in his Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle argues that every person must make a choice to act good. Within his ideas of the good it is imperative that men take responsibility for their own actions and that they understand what their own intentions are doing in relation to the good. However, there are some oppositions that believe this is not the case. They would argue that men have no control over how something appears to them or how they perceive it, and that for every man the final end/good/happiness looks differently.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While analyzing the Tao-te-Ching, many major themes are apparent. From the inevitability of change to the importance of non-action, the Tao-te-Ching is truly full of life lessons that deserve extensive analysis; however, one of the most prevalent and recurring themes is balance and its importance. Throughout Cultural Perspectives, many authors have addressed this same theme. Siddhartha Gautama Buddha, Plato, and Saint Augustine have all discussed this important topic; however, Aristotle best complements and contrasts Lao Tzu’s Tao-te-Ching in his work Nichmachean Ethics. When comparing and contrasting these two texts, one can see that these two authors had very similar ideas on the concept of balance. When comparing the two texts’ thoughts…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on what are the requirements for people to be considered good, or virtuous. He explains how political science is the ultimate science, since it deals not only with individual good, but with a societal good, which involves leadership in the most significant manner. For him, being virtuous is a necessary component of good life, which is one that is lived well, and may be perceived as “happy.” For practical purposes, however, in a world where one must interact with others, it is difficult to reach a consensus on the patterns of behavior that can be seen as virtuous. Nonetheless, Aristotle provides a most thorough structure to living virtuously, which he opens to be molded to the circumstances and…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle’s take on ethics is much different from any other philosopher. His view of ethics is very vague, do as the just man would do and for the same reasons as him. In saying this, Aristotle would reject Robert Nozick’s experience machine thought experiment. Though Aristotle’s ethics allow for less conflict that would come from a theory that contains rules, it is a problem that it is not very clear what one should do to be moral. Aristotle’s ethics are virtue ethics.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Every art and every inquiry, and likewise every action and choice, seems to aim at some good, and hence it has been beautifully said that the good is that at which all things aim.” As Aristotle makes inquires and deliberates over what is the highest end for the human life, he debates over what constitutes the highest good. Throughout the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle argues that we aim at some end through our pursuits of action, and that those ends are in some way connected at achieving the highest good. Aristotle suggests the possibility of happiness, translated from the Greek word eudaimonia, which refers to a “state of having a good indwelling spirit or being in a contented state of being healthy, happy and prosperous.” For the one who…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Despite emanating over two thousand year ago, Aristotle’s teachings are still relevant and can be applied to situations in the modern day. Even today people debate whether or not one can know what is truly moral. Certainly, most legal systems are based upon trying to conclude whether people should be held accountable for various actions. Even so, being legally responsible for something does not necessarily imply that the person is, consequently, also morally responsible, or vice versa. According to most modern legal systems, if someone is legally responsible for an action, that person will face consequences under the legal system.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Nicomachean Ethics, we are provided with Aristotle’s philosophy regarding the nature of virtue. He aims at explaining what virtue is, how it is acquired, and how it is related to both happiness (eudaimonia) and friendships. Overall, Aristotle is addressing the questions of: “What is a human being’s telos (purpose)?” and “What is the highest good?” It is by answering these questions that we will be able to see how Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics is related to both Socrates and Epictetus’ philosophy, not to mention how it has contributed to my understanding of generosity, and virtue overall.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Aristotle realized voluntary and involuntary needs to be considered during a time frame in that an action is occurring. Involuntary is when someone is being asked to do something they are uncomfortable with due to blackmail. Ultimately this could harm someone they care about. An involuntary action suggests no consideration, no impulse or no desire to the action, but feel pain and regret. Non-voluntary is doing things out of ignorance.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The protagonist Dr. Stockman in Henry Ibsen’s Enemy of the People fosters an idea that, “That the [compact] majority has the monopoly of the truth. What sort of truths are they that the majority usually supports? They are the truths that are of such advanced age that they are beginning to break up. And if a truth is as old as that, it is also in a fair way to become a lie, gentleman.” (Ibsen, 59).…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle goes on to say that the unfortunate sufferings of the figure must be “not through some vice or depravity but by some error of judgment," meaning that there must be a flaw in the figures character which brings about their misfortunes. Aristotle also…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and Kant have one major similarity. They both feel that the reasons behind an action are important in determining the moral worth of that action. I will demonstrate the differences between a person of Aristotelian virtue and a person who has Kantian moral worth in the following pages of this paper. I will also argue why Aristotle’s view is correct. The major differences between Aristotle and Kant are how they deem the reasons behind an action to have moral worth.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An Ethical Responsibility

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    TOK ESSAY “POSSESION OF KNOWLEDGE CARRIES AN ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITY” All people bear knowledge within themselves. Once Voltaire said, “With great power comes great responsibility”. I think knowledge is a very important and a huge part of power. Without knowledge, there would be no concept of the power.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays