Meritocracy In America

Improved Essays
In America’s revolutionary years—the late 1700s—the nation’s people rapidly transitioned from subjects of monarchy and hierarchy to citizens of democracy and meritocracy. Because society was intertwined with the government at the time, social customs began to emphasize equal opportunity and the pursuit of happiness for all American citizens. The new Republic demolished the hereditary, dependent aristocracy and replaced it with a natural, talent-based aristocracy. Using the new sociopolitical foundation of independence and egalitarianism, citizens were suddenly able to assault other traditional institutions—domestic and indentured servitude and slavery—as attacks on liberty. Gordon Wood argues in his critical essay “The Radicalism of the American …show more content…
Before the Revolution, those who amassed wealth monopolized political power, creating an interlocking directorate that passed down power and influence through generations. The establishment of a set social hierarchy in America, the ancient regime, made it difficult for other seeking social mobility to enter these webs of inherent personal and familial authority. Called Courtiers, these people received “position or rank…artificially from above—from hereditary or personal connections that…flowed from the crown” (Wood 24). Independent men whose “position or rank came naturally from their talent and from below, from recognition by the people” clashed with the Patriots (Wood 24). The Courtiers were loyalists; during the Revolution, families such as the Penns and Allens of Pennsylvania and the Crugers of New York emigrated, bringing with them the hereditary aristocracy. Although many of these families returned after the Revolution, Wood explains that America no longer had a use for them, instead allotting power to the patriots and the wealthy. Remnants of inherited privilege in law—primogeniture and entail—were abolished by the 1790s. The natural aristocracy had superseded the hereditary one, for the nascent Republic considered “a man’s merit to rest entirely with himself, without any regard to family, blood, or connection” (Wood 27). Patriot America assaulted the patriarchal monarchy, definitively replacing it with a natural aristocracy based on individual merit rather than family

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Forced Founders Response Paper While American education has been teaching high-school students that the American Revolution was led to by events like the Boston Tea Party, the Battle of Concord or the Proclamation of 1763, Woody Holton, a history professor from the University of South Carolina, decided to veer off in a new direction by expounding a revisionist theory through his book Forced Founders: Indians, Debtors, Slaves & the Making of the American Revolution in Virginia. In Forced Founders, Holton argues that Virginia elites were as important as the Independence movement leaders, but they were also powerfully influenced by other “grassroots” forces such as the British merchants, Indians, farmers and slaves (Holton, 206). He also argues…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Wood in The Radicalism of the American Revolution (1992). Wood argues that instead of increasing in prominence, by 1800 the revolutionary leaders could do little more than watch helplessly as their utopian vision of a republican society based on civic virtue was mutated into a democratic system centered on the self-interest and personal greed of ordinary Americans. The same elites who had made “the interests and prosperity of ordinary people- their pursuits of happiness- the goal of society and government,” found themselves struggling against a wave of corruption they could not hope to stop. These gentlemen of society placed safeguards into the governmental framework to ensure that the “betters” of society, those disinterested individuals, would retain positions necessary to determine the common good. This effort culminated in the ratification of the United States Constitution, which Bouton counters as the embodiment of elitist authoritarianism.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The American Revolution was caused by much more than the simple concept of no taxation without representation; its roots can be found dozens of years prior, in 1763 and the years that followed, as well as back to the early history of colonial North America. Two authors and historians, Colin Calloway, who wrote The Scratch of a Pen: 1763 and the Transformation of North America, and Eric Foner, who authored Give Me Liberty! an American History, offer two comprehensive viewpoints into the origins of the American Revolution and a historical analysis of how the events and conflicts which took place during the time periods influenced the Revolution’s arrival. Colin Calloway’s The Scratch of a Pen begins in the year of 1763, with Calloway defining…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Merritt focuses on morality and virtue’s role in colonial markets and politics prior to the Revolution. She argues that communal republican ideals and modern beliefs that valued individual interests came to a head in the new, product-driven prerevolutionary economy. According to Merritt, Americans did not reject self-interest or “the debilitating vices and luxuries of the Old World” in the wake of their republican Revolution; rather, “[The colonists’] ability to embrace the contradictions of the marketplace, as much as republican ideology, fueled the revolutionary movement” (Merritt…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gordon Wood and Gary B. Nash are both are very vocal supporters of their respective schools of thought, occasionally to their detriment. However, there are few authors that present their cases as clearly as these two historians, and as a result much can be gained by taking a look at an exemplary work by each author. First we will consider Gordon Wood’s The Radicalization of the American Revolution (Random House, 1991). In this award winning synthesis Wood sought to challenge the widely held contention that the American Revolution was a conservative undertaking that was meant to maintain the status qou within the colonies.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zinn Chapter 1 Analysis

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The oppression of smaller communities and individuals by the larger states leads to an inherent support of nationalism in the narrative of history; as a result, the assumption of the viewpoint of smaller communities allows for an unexplored historical perspective. By attempting to understand the perspective of smaller communities during the efforts to colonize and explore the Americas, Zinn introduces the importance of historical interpretation to his approach to narrating history. Despite his typical treatment as a hero and pioneer for his discovery of America, Christopher Columbus established a precedent of brutality towards the Arawak communities by commanding “all persons… to collect a certain quantity of gold every three months,” upon…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A book that demonstrated how society and culture were transformed. He also gave other perspectives on events that leads the colonial to side with independence as a conservative yet radical revolution. To further support his arguments, Wood uses revolutions that involve with radicalism to emphasize that that the American Revolution were not conservatives, based on the transformation of social change both in the colonies and Britain, but were as radical and revolutionary as any in history. Also continues with talks about the condition of the revolutions, talks about the patriots vs. courtiers, the dependency of slavery, inheritance, and…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Canning, Kate Revolution of 1800 The Revolution of 1800 started when a decision had to be made by the United States citizens: “Who is going to be president?”. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson went head-to-head to competed for ‘America’s favorite’ during the election. Federalists were concerned that Jefferson “would give more power to the sates, dismantle the army and navy, and overturn Hamilton’s financial system”(Digital History). The Republicans felt that the Federalists showed “contempt for the liberties of the American people.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Revolutions of Interest Gordon Wood and Gary Nash offered two different claims about the radical ideas of the American Revolution and who had them. Wood proposed the revolution derived from the more elite in society, wealthier land owning white men. It was between Patriots and Courtiers. Courtiers were those who wished to maintain the rule of Great Britain, in order that social position should derive from the King and aristocracy. While Patriots desired talent and merit, along with recognition from the people, should determine the stature of an individual.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For centuries the people of Europe had been under the strong sway of the aristocracy that existed in European countries, however the development of colonies lead to a different type of aristocracy in the English colonies, the natural aristocracy. Aristocrats had always been the highest social class among European society, thanks to their large amount of wealth that had been passed down from generation to generation. The wealth that was passed down gave these select families massive amounts of influence over not only the common people but of people in higher positions like that of the King. In America this system of inherited wealth didn’t exist and it lead to the development of the natural aristocracy.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Meritocracy Myth

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Question #2 While most people cannot name the Meritocracy Myth, remain unaware of its existence and are unable to define it, they still believe it. It manages to permeate every facet of society and social institution. Its influence is everywhere. This would not be a problem if it were true. However, a myth by its very definition means something that is untrue and therefore the Meritocracy Myth is something we have learned to believe in with little basis in reality.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the documented history of America, people of different beliefs and ideologies have felt the need to stand against perceived injustices imposed upon them from powerful forces in authoritative roles. Social movements have defined the procedures determined to make a change in the methods of conduct in social circles. Going back into the early channels of American history, revolutionaries have existed since the beginning stages of democracy in American government since the eighteenth century. Tilly and Wood (2013) describe the controversies of John Wilkes who led one of the first types of social movement campaigns with an uprising in governmental defiance in early America against the political conflicts. His influence in using his power and money, catapulted future efforts of campaign reform in America creating social movements to justify changes in subordinate groups dominated by greater authority.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Meritocracy

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Meritocracy is a philosophy or a political system in which merits determine the social status of each individual. According to the Harrap’s Chambers dictionary meritocracy is “a social system based on leadership by people of great talent or intelligence, rather than of wealth or noble birth.” Even if it is never stated, most Western countries nowadays are using this meritocratic system, including America. It can be opposed to the aristocracy which is a government only led by a small part of individuals who become the elite. It can also be opposed to nepotism—more relevant nowadays—which applies when people with authority use it to give favour their relatives or friends.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today, many people apply to top, elite colleges or for a job that person desires. The applications come in and many of them hold the same accolades as many others. Colleges and business henceforth needed a way to choose from their top applicants, and thus the letter of recommendation became included in the application process. The addition of the letter of recommendation decreased the emphasis on the merit of the applicant dramatically. The application process became more about who the applicant knows rather than what the applicant has done.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meritocracy is an idealistic theory that may someday be achieved. The core concept of meritocracy that suggest society, specifically institutions should be government by intellectual citizens is logical, however the reality does not entirely reflect tis model because of the strong relationship between socioeconomic status and opportunities that drive the privileged classes to thrive/prosper. However, the practice of objectively using merit to admit students within school is not entirely sound. However, it is arguable that this like many other circumstances in a capitalistic society wills not ever manufacture a ‘fair playing ground’ for applicants in both academia and in the real world. Irrefutably, there will always be a division between classes, and status that will be advantageous for some.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays