Scampie And Magneto

Superior Essays
Issue one: Whether the court has jurisdiction to try Scampie for the offences involving Magneto?
The general principle is that a State only has jurisdiction to try offences that are committed within its borders. However, legislation has acted to artificially extend a country’s physical boundaries for the purpose of jurisdiction. In Cox v. Army Council [1963] AC 48, HL, the words “or which, if committed in England, would be punishable by that law” found in section 70 of the Army Act, 1955 was given effect to convict a British Soldier for driving without due care and attention contrary to the English Road Traffic Act. This was so even though the incident itself had occurred in Germany. As Viscount Simonds stated, the “character of universality” of the offence was sufficient to bring it within the scope of the Act. A quintessential depiction of the extension of territoriality is the concept of territorial waters. A ship that is within the territorial sea of a country is within that country’s jurisdiction: Pianka v R (1977) 25 WIR 438, PC. In Trinidad and Tobago, s.3 of the Territorial Sea Act extends State boundaries by 12 nautical miles from the nearest point of the baselines. Since the incident between Scampie and Magneto took place 7 nautical miles from the coast of Trinidad and Tobago, it will be regarded as having occurred within their territorial waters under the Act. The prosecution is therefore correct in stating that it falls within the scope of that country’s jurisdiction. Issue two: Whether PC Apprehen’s actions were sufficient to constitute a lawful arrest? Alderson v. Booth [1969] 2 QB 216 indicated that Halsbury’s Laws of England, 3rd ed., vol. 10, (1955) captures the essence of an arrest where it states that: “there must be an element of compulsion which is provided by touching or by unequivocal words accompanied by submission.” It is imperative that the arrestee knows what he is submitting to, otherwise he is not arrested. The officer’s words “We need to talk mister” are too vague to constitute an arrest; clear words must be used in order to show that the person is under compulsion. However, it is noteworthy that minor irregularities in the way an arrest is carried out does not vitiate the charge itself. We are further told that PC Apprehen took Scampie’s arm, obviously with a view to restraining him. Even after being struck, the officer took Scampie’s arm again and this can classify the arrest as lawful. This is because the element of compulsion by touching was accompanied by Scampie’s submission. It is hard to see how Scampie could argue that he did not know what he was submitting to, especially since the officer was said to be in uniform. Thus, the charges of resisting a lawful arrest and assaulting a police officer in the execution of his duty are valid. Issue three: Whether a warrant is always needed for an arrest? The defence
…show more content…
The common law dictates that an arrest can be either with or without a warrant, and statute has codified and extended some of these common law powers. Section 3(4) of the Criminal Law Act of Trinidad and Tobago Chap 10:04 states “where a police officer with reasonable cause, suspects that an arrestable offence has been committed, he may arrest without warrant anyone whom he, with reasonable cause, suspects to be guilty of the offence.” A key element is that the officer must have reasonable cause for his belief. Section 3 (5) also empowers officers to arrest without warrant if they believe an arrestable offence “is about to be committed.” The Police Act also grants the power of arrest without warrant against any person resisting arrest or who commits aggravated …show more content…
However, according to Elias and Others v. Pasmore [1934] 2 KB 164, a person who has been arrested may be searched if it is believed that he has material evidence in his possession. Some Caribbean statutes have codified this. It therefore follows that since the search was only carried out after Smith informed PC Apprehen of the theft and identified Scampie as the perpetrator, the search was lawful. The offence had been recently committed, thus is was reasonable for PC Apprehen to assume that if guilty, Scampie would still have the wallet in his possession, just as the search

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    R V Campbell (2010) NSWSC 995 Desmond Campbell was found guilty of pushing his wife, Janet Campbell, of six months off a cliff top in the Royal National Park. Desmond pushed Janet from the top of a sheer 50m cliff south of Burning Palms, resulting in her death as she had hit her head on a rick platform below, in March 2005. Elements Of The Offence Before a criminal act can be brought to trial, the police and prosecutors need to prove the elements of a particular offence are present. The elements are; actus reus, mens rea and causation.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Part1: Issue- In this case, there is an issue surrounding whether Mr. Kalajzich is guilty of murdering his wife Megan Kalajzich on the 27th of May 1998. It had been found that he had intended to murder her and it occurred as he attempted to discharge a loaded gun. There were two appeals made to the Court of Appeal by Mr. Kalajzich, which was an appeal against his conviction, and the other an appeal for special leave. Both appeals were dismissed/refused by the Court.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court thus reversed the Court of Appeals of Maryland’s judgment and the case has been remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court held that for the purposes of arresting with a warrant, police entry into private property is authorised as it is the “execution of the king’s process.” The judgment stated that an officer may also enter private property for the intention of arresting a person who is escaping an affray, preventing a murder or if an offender has ran into the property. This does not include serving a…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Vs Arkansas

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In order to obtain a warrant one must have a neutral magistrate to determine if there is pc before suspects are arrested. A sworn affidavit to show that the facts lead to pc. And the name of the person getting arrested to satisfy the particularity requirement so the defendant can be identified with reasonable certainty. Officers don’t have to get warrants in homes as if it is an emergency. In this case, once Ray declared that he was going to kill Janay.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Defending Mr. Juneau Background Information On the day in question, Mr. Juneau was caught up in several mishaps but because of certain conditions, he shouldn’t be held liable for any of them. Three crimes committed, which included the following: • Possession of Nutria- an endangered species- with the intent to distribute; • Theft of gas; and • The murder of the neighbor. All three can be considered very serious offenses and therefore must be thoroughly reviewed so that it can be proven that Mr. Juneau isn’t guilty. Our defense will be that Mr. Juneau is not guilty due to diminished capacity.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fourth Amendment Warrants

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages

    As followed, searches incident to arrest do not require a warrant if the search is in radius of the suspect. The officer may search the surrounding area for illegal contraband or weapons. Ultimately, to protect the officers around as well as to collect valuable…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mr. Buckley Case Summary

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mr. Buckley was charged and convicted in the trial court with theft under the Offenses Against Property Act, unlawful use of a credit card, and uttering a forged document. Upon conviction, he appealed to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District claiming insufficient evidence. The first charge of theft under the Offenses Against Property Act requires one to acquire and/or use someone else’s property without permission. Since Mr. Phipps did not give Mr. Buckley permission to use his credit card for any purchases the burden of proof has been met for this charge to stand.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    a) Consent to Search In R v. Wills (1992) the court found the following criteria necessary for a valid consent search: 1. There was consent, expressed or implied; 2. The giver of the consent had the authority to give the consent; 3. The consent was voluntary (not police coerced); 4. The giver of consent was aware of the police conduct; 5.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 1920s in the United States, was referred to as the “roaring twenties” because of the freewheeling popular culture of the decade. During this time period prohibition was one aspect as to what made the twenties roar. Citizens became more devious and wild. Once prohibition took effect liquor trade was brought underground. Citizens attended illegal speakeasies instead of bars.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stop and Search is now governed by 2 statutes; stop and search with arrest situates under the police and criminal evidence act 1984 whilst a stop and search without an arrest comes under section 60 of the criminal justice and public order act. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/police/operational-policing/pace-codes/pace-code-a-2011?view=Binary, Section 60 of the 1994 criminal justice and public Order Act was introduced to originally tackle people going to illegal raves which were a major problem in the 1980's and early 90's. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jun/12/police-stop-and-search-black-people, Vikram Dodd ,The Guardian, Tuesday 12 June 2012. It gave police the power, if they feared violence or disorder, to stop and search suspects at a specific time and place. I will further be discussing the controversies surrounding Police stop and search and concluding with my own views on this subject.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Operation Pipeline

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The legal infrastructure of the War on Drugs has easily turned every moment of one’s life a moment of possibility for arrest. The leniency on policemen and their reasons for suspecting someone of a crime is partially was is causing this outbreak of incarcerations. Although there are times when the police are correct in their assumptions, their reasons for making these assumptions are out of line. Methods of fighting drug crime, such as Operation Pipeline, may be effective, but not a hundred percent necessary. Michelle Alexander mentioned that “once upon a time,” it was common knowledge that unless a policeman had probable cause, they had no reason or right to stop and search someone (Alexander 63).…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The way a subject behaves or the way one conducts him/her self can be probable cause but it will lack in proof to detain someone. In the case Mallory v. United states arrest can not be made on suspicion but only on the grounds of probable cause. Arrest can also be made if a police officer cannot find out a person’s name or address. If it keeps from the suspect from hurting anyone else, stealing or damaging property, obstructing the highway or acting indecent, or to protect a child, along with breech of the peace. Police can only detain a person for 24 hours without having to charge or releasing them.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After a person is arrested, there are steps and processes that must be followed. One big part of the process includes searches and seizures. What in particular has to be noted when it comes to searches are the principles behind illegal searches, what can constitute a legal and illegal search, and when the lines can be blurred between the two. Searches are necessary to gather evidence. They play big roles in any investigation, but they must be conducted correctly.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issues are whether there is an exception regarding to the majority rule and proper plaintiff rule in Foss v Harbottle? In the cases of Foss v Harbottle provides two types of rule which is “majority rule” and “proper plaintiff rule”. “Majority rule” is the majority shareholder decisions and choices over the minority shareholders. The majority votes from the shareholder within the company are ¾ of voting rights which is 75 %.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays