Universalizability In Kant's Categorical Imperative

Improved Essays
Kant's first formulation of the Categorical Imperative is that of universalizability. When someone acts, it is according to some rule, or maxim. For Kant, an act is only permissible if one is willing for the maxim that allows the action to be a universal law by which everyone acts. Maxims fail this test if they produce either a contradiction in conception or a contradiction in the will when universalized.

Kant believes that all moral judgments must be universalizable. That is, if we say that an act is right for one person, then we are committed to saying that it is right for all other relevantly similar persons in relevantly similar circumstances. In the same manner if an act is wrong for other people then it is wrong for any one person unless there is some difference that justifies making an exception. This principle of universalizability expresses the simple point
…show more content…
Or, in other words, an agent's action is morally permissible if and only if it is rational for him or her to will that the maxim (i.e., principle) on which he or she is acting be a universal law. Unfortunately, one doesn't always know what the maxim on which one is acting is or whether one could rationally will that that maxim be a universal law. People contend that the correct ethical theory must be one on which we can always know whether a particular action is morally right or wrong. This might motivate us to endorse a subjective version of Kant's Universal Law Formula on which an agent's action is morally permissible if and only if he or she believes that the maxim on which he or she is acting when he or she performs that action is universalizable and morally obligatory if and only if he or she believes that there is no other action he or she could perform from a universalizable

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When he [Kant] begins to deduce from this precept [i.e. CI] any of the actual duties of morality, he fails, almost grotesquely, to show that there would be any contradiction, any logical (not to say physical) impossibility, in the adoption by all rational beings of the most outrageously immoral rules of conduct. All he shows is that the consequences of their universal adoption would be such as no one would choose to incur. Here Mill considers of consequences in moral action, as we will see, Mill’s consequentialism rather than Utilitarianism is the direct charge made to Kant, these two notions are not same, the utiitlirms principle is seek happiness and avoid pain, precisely moral action would be conducted on maximizing happiness and minimizing…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant lays out his theory for making moral decisions. Unlike many other philosophers, Kant focuses not on the consequences of actions, but on the maxim in which the action was performed; in addition, Kant also tries to find his moral theory a priori instead of through empirical experience. He attempts to formulate a theory grounded through pure reason in which he bases his moral law on something that has never been experienced before that we are able to imagine and strive towards. Kant’s theory circles around the idea of a Supreme Principle of Morality called the Categorical Imperative which encompasses the Formula of Universal Law and the Formula of Humanity; all of which I will…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this is where Kant’s categorical imperatives come into play. As stated before, the first is that we are to never treat people as a means. Secondly, we are to adhere to a maxim that can govern all people and eventually become universal law. There is an incredible difference between a categorical imperative and a hypothetical imperative. The difference is evident because to the Kantian, morality should be based on the categorical imperative, or something that is help to be good in any scenario at any time.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The categorical imperative means that anytime an act is made, it must be able to stand as a universal law. It provides us with a pattern of morals that does not contain anthropological information. There are five major complaints to Kant’s theory. First, people believe that it is too hard to apply to real life. Next, it does not include enough acts that are common in real life.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, ending in Kant’s objective which was to “search for and establish the supreme principle of morality.” Kant believed everyone should be just as concerned for morality as he was including in moral truth. Kant introduces imperatives, and furthers this when differentiating hypothetical imperatives, and categorical imperatives. Kant also explains categorical imperatives in relation to “acting on maxims.” Kant’s ideals paved way for understanding the…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant Versus Mill

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    For purposes of this argument, we will focus on the first two. The first categorical imperative, known as the “Formula of the Universal Law”, states: “I am never to act otherwise than so that I could also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (83). Meaning, if the situation would not be possible for everyone to take part in as a universal law, then the situation does not withstand Kant’s moral theory. This situation is best described through the example of a lying promise. In short, if someone was asking for a loan with underlying intentions to lie and not pay the loan back, then a lying promise is made to the lender.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The categorical imperative is a moral obligation that is not dependent on the situation of individual, meaning there is a set rule for everyone. A Kantian would say that in order to do something, everyone else must also be allowed to do it. This means that if someone can lie, then everyone can lie, and if someone can steal then everyone can steal. A Kantian would add that if the situation in which you try to achieve your maxim is immoral, do not give up. Rather, you should find a different way in which to achieve the maxim.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An Exploration of Othello: Delving into the Mind Frame of Desdemona and Iago Immanuel Kant’s view on ethics and morality is that in order to determine if we are acting in a fashion that can be deemed moral, we have not only a duty to ourselves but others. It is duty that determines our actions. Kant establishes certain limitations and restrictions upon the notion of duty, narrowing down a definition which would allow us to therefore be able to readily distinguish “whether the action which agrees with duty is done from duty, or from a selfish view” (Kant 2). In order to figure out whether our actions correspond to this concept of duty, Kant has established what is known as the categorical imperative which states that you should reflect upon your actions and be comfortable with them becoming a universal law. Insofar as duty is concerned, if we follow this principle it allows for a broader understanding of what is meant by moral and ethical behaviour.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper about ethical theories and cases I chose to discuss the positions of John Mill and Immanuel Kant, due to their dissimilar views on morality and ethical theories. From the four cases, I chose to apply the two philosopher’s theories to case number two. This case states the dilemma “My full-time (but not live-in) babysitter hinted that she would like to use my address to enroll her daughter in my excellent local public elementary school; her neighborhood school is awful. The alternative is for her to send her daughter to private school, a financial burden but not an impossibility. Should I offer my address?”…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A categorical imperative is an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person’s inclination. It provides us with a way to evaluate whether an action is moral or not. There are three formulations to test a categorical imperative: the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), the Formula of the Law of Nature (FLN), and the Formula of Humanity as an End. The first formulation tests to see if a universalized maxim contradicts itself, and thus, cannot be universalized as a basis of action without causing confusion. The second formulation asks if an individual would choose to live in a world where the universalized maxim is followed at all times.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For centuries, philosophers have applied sets of normative principles in effort to distinguish if an action is morally right or wrong. The purpose of normative ethics is to help guide society on how humans ought to act. These theories provide justifiable and reliable outcomes to determine if an action is moral or immoral. Two principles that play a significant role in normative ethics are consequentialism and Kantianism. When faced with a moral dilemma, these theories may agree or conflict with one another.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Principle of Humanity is vague when it comes to how we treat others to an end. For example, an autonomous and rational human named Tim buys an American flag at Wall-Mart. A week later Tim is about to start a bonfire with some friends and realizes that the only way to get the fire started is to burn that American flag. Tim burns the American flag and has a good time with his friends. At the same time, soldiers in the army are dying in the Middle East fighting in battle.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Universalizability describes that if it is wrong for everyone to do…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant was a deontologist and developed an unbreakable moral code that he called the “Categorical Imperative”. Kant characterized the Categorical Imperative as an objective, rationally necessary, and unconditional principle that people must…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays