Juvenile Court Hearing Case Study

Superior Essays
1. What three types of cases does Juvenile court hear? Please list and describe and give examples in each category.
Three cases Juvenile courts hear are “those who are neglected, dependent or abused because those charged with their custody and control mistreat them or fail to provide proper care; those who are incorrigible, ungovernable or status offenders; and those who violate laws, ordinances and codes classified as penal or criminal” (Hess, Pg 301). First, children who are neglected, dependent, and abused do not have a stable environment to live. Their parents or guardians do not provide proper care that is emotional, psychological, and nurturing. Thus their age development does not fully develop, because their growth is stop due to factors
…show more content…
Adults courts are aiming to prosecuted adults for crimes, in juvenile court they are aiming to deal with delinquents’ acts. Unless the juvenile has committed a serious crime, they will be transfer to adult court. Another difference in the adult courts, the aim is to punish, while in juvenile courts their goal would be to rehabilitate and to focus on the minor's well-being or best interest. Furthermore, the adult courts are more formal then the juvenile courts. For example, evidence may need to be more accurate in the adult court, while in the juvenile court since the crimes aren’t as serious, may not need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Lastly, the juvenile court focuses on more alternative services such as parole, probation, and diversionary …show more content…
Please list and describe the different types of transfer provisions that exist to transfer juveniles to adult court.

“Juveniles may be transferred to criminal via three basic mechanisms: judicial waiver, prosecutorial discretion and statutory exclusion” (Hess, Pg 315). Additionally, discretionary judicial waiver, presumptive waiver, and mandatory judicial waiver are key information as well.

1. Judicial Waiver: “Judicial waiver is a transfer mechanism whereby the juvenile court judge is allowed the discretion to make an individual determination about whether a juvenile who meets statutory criteria should be tried in juvenile court or, instead be waiver to criminal court” (Hess, Pg 315).

2. Discretionary judicial waiver: A juvenile court judge makes the decision to move cases or to be transfer to the criminal court. The judge based this off individualized, offender-based snorting choice or decision that he has put thought into it.

3. Presumptive waiver: This waiver or decision comes down to the juvenile court judge, who struggles with the burden of trying to keeps these certain cases in juvenile courts instead of adult court. The judge most provide persuasive evidence or youthful respondent will be transfer to adult

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Summary Of In Re Gault

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    During the adjudicatory process, there are usually two judicial hearings that the juvenile attends. The first is the initial appearance, is the equivalent of arraignment where the juvenile is notified of the charges against them, they are appointed legal counsel and bail is considered. If the case has not been settled by the close of the initial appearance, it is held for trial. In re Gault is the case that changed the nature of juvenile trials forever. In 1967, the United States Supreme Court ruled that defendants must be afforded the same rights as adults.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many states passed legal reforms designed to get tougher on juvenile crim in the 1980’s. One of the reforms was the revision of transfer laws to expand the types of offenses and offenders eligible for transfer from juvenile court to adult court for trial and sentencing. These lowered the minimum age for transfer , increased the number of transfer-elijinle offenses, and reduced judicial discretion in transfer decision making. Sentencing juvenile delinquents is not a very good thing for many things. Juveniles are children under the age of 18.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    This waiver also applies to juveniles who are at least 16 years old and facing a misdemeanor charge if said juvenile has previously been charged with a felony(textbook). Another method of transferring juveniles to adult court is through statutory exclusion or legislative waiver. Under this system, certain crimes juveniles commit is automatically transferred based on the decisions of legislators in which the crime was committed. Problems exist because what qualifications do these legislators possess that allows them to make a decision on whether or not a case should be tried in adult court. Also, this type of waiver can tie a judge’s hands on whether or not a juvenile’s case should be moved to adult…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These protections included; to have a judicial hearing, be represented by an attorney during the hearing, access to documents being considered by the juvenile court, and a statement of the reasons in support of the waiver order. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) was the first decision by the U.S. Supreme Court for juvenile delinquency procedures. The ruling extended due process rights to juveniles. Specifically, in the areas of; right to a notice of charges in order to prepare for defense, right to legal counsel even if they cannot afford one, right to hear sworn testimony and to confront and cross-examine witnesses, and the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the right against…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are some very pronounced differences between the adult correctional system and the juvenile correctional system. Within the adult correctional system there is a greater emphasis on punishment, surveillance, arrest, and incarceration. In contrast within the juvenile correctional system the is very limited use of detention due to the fact that research has found that it only exacerbates the issues that lead to delinquent behavior. Instead the juvenile correctional system tries to divert all of the juveniles they possibly can from the juvenile justice system. There is also a greater emphasis on prevention of juvenile crime by providing interventions for at risk youth, many of these programs are not run by the court.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In response to a spike in juvenile crime rates during the transition into the Civil Rights era, states enacted tough punitive transfer laws that made it easier to automatically transfer juveniles to the adult criminal justice system, trying and sentencing adolescents as adults. Automatic transfer laws exempt certain crimes from being processed through the juvenile justice system by addressing the issue of juvenile delinquency based on irrational fears of a juvenile superpredator. Over the last several decades, the media portrayed the juvenile superpredator as gangs of urban thugs responsible for the majority of gun-related homicides and drug-related crimes nationwide. For example, nighty news would often report on bands of inner city adolescents as: fatherless, soulless, without conscience, beyond redemption, spiritually poor and were wilding their way through the streets committing all manner of horrific crimes [citation].…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the prosecutorial waiver, judicial waiver and the legislative waiver vary across the states in the degree of decision-making flexibility permitted to the courts, judicial waiver was best suited for the Roper v. Simmons case. The judicial waiver, especially discretionary is dependent on the individualized assessment of the case by a juvenile court judge to establish whether a juvenile meets the threshold waiver criteria. Judges are often objective in their use of judicial waiver. Thus, in determining controversial cases such as Roper v. Simmons, which it showed the likelihood that rehabilitative and deterrent concerns would not be attained if the juvenile court retained jurisdiction, it was imperative for the case to be waived. Typically, judges would seriously consider the offence committed, the age or maturity, and the previous history of the offender prior to waiving the juvenile to adult court.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) and parens patriae doctrine both specify regulations on how juveniles should be handled and why they should be kept separate from adult criminal court. (About JJDPA; Walsh, 2016). With this being said all states have one or three forms of transfer laws (also called…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juveniles that are in juvenile court are needing to give up part of their protection in order to receive care that is given to juveniles. This is different from the Supreme Court in which you are allowed to receive the special care needed without having to give up their…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the formal juvenile justice process system the police act as the main gatekeep (). They play an important and crucial role in serving and helping children receive compassionate, careful, and individualized treatment. These gatekeepers provide a backup to those who violated the law in the interest of reformers (). The police also exercise discretion related to the handling of juvenile encounters. They are given the option to take the juvenile into custody and refer them to a diversionary program that is operated by the police or a community agency ().…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, community corrections programs have often failed to reduce prison populations. The juvenile court 's work is very difficult and involves some of the most emotion-laden and controversial issues in our society. As such, its decisions often find disagreement. The extent to which the court 's discretionary authority in individual cases should be expanded or restrained continues to be debated for all types of cases before the court , because these courts make decisions regarding so…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After going over the various observations I made after watching twenty-one cases in juvenile court, was the differences between the juvenile court, to the adult court, and trends that I noticed while observing the hearings. The first difference I noticed was that the Johnson County juvenile court separated the order in which cases are tried, with the cases for less serious offenses first, then the juveniles who were detained were the last ones to be tried. The second difference I noticed was that during the observation, the judge called for a reset court date on several, which lead to cases to be decided on a different date. Now when going over the trends I noticed while observing. While I failed to correctly choose the proper variables needed…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adjudicatory Hearing

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Once it has been determined that a juvenile can even be waived to the adult court (based on laws and regulations for that specific jurisdiction), there are three main types of waivers that can be used; these are: the judicial waiver, prosecutorial discretion, and statutorial exclusion. Judicial waiver is the most commonly used transfer mechanism, and it involves judicial prosecutors and/or judges making the decision based on the circumstances (offense criteria, age, etc.). Prosecutorial discretion occurs in those states that have determined with its statutes that prosecutors should have the authority to decide whether the juvenile will be tried in juvenile court or in the adult court. The final waiver, statutorial exclusion, is used when a state’s law mandates that certain offenses automatically be tried in the adult court system.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The proceedings were calm and relaxed and the judge influenced much of the discretion for the juvenile offender. Since the judge was to act to the greatest…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Juvenile Rights Period

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There are five periods of juvenile justice history. They include the colonial period, refuge period, juvenile court period, juvenile rights period, and crime control period. The colonial period lasted from 1600s to 1800s. During the colonial American period, two influences remained constant: the authority of the parent and the role of religion.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics