Just War Theorists: Is There Justice In War?

Great Essays
In the glare of an ever-present and far-reaching news cycle, decisions to engage in war are of paramount concern to a state. Given this greater accountability, there is perhaps an even stronger emphasis for states to have sound moral reasoning in its actions leading to and during war. Some would argue that there is no room for justice in war. According to realists, wars are fought on the basis of power and security issues; “the pursuit of lesser national interests rarely justifies war” (Morkevičius 2015, p. 20). Pacifists, on the other hand, contend that there is no justice in war as war in itself is inherently bad for it requires not only violence but also the high probability of killing. This essay will focus on the more prominent concept …show more content…
There are issues arising around proportionality, how much force should a state be willing to use to protect the rights of individuals in a foreign land? Should a state risk the lives of its soldiers for this cause? It is worth noting here that there is a contradictory nature in humanitarian intervention. By intervening to try to protect rights, rights are violated. Because of this, it is not plausible that intervening wars are a useful tool to promote rights in a foreign country (Norman 2013). However, Walzer suggests that such wars are beneficial given that “all states have an interest in global stability and global humanity” (2004, p. 74). For Caney (2005), the probability of success principle is a major underpinning for the case of humanitarian intervention. If intervention is unlikely to succeed, which is most often the case, there is no point for it despite Walzer’s claims of its worthiness. There are also issues surrounding the jus ad bellum principle of right intent. Many decisions to undertake interventionist wars are not …show more content…
When these justifications were contested, advocates appealed to the justification that the intervention was to protect the Iraqis themselves from human rights violations (Norman 2013). Fiala goes further and asserts that given weapons of mass destruction were not found, the real intention behind the Bush doctrine was based on a “broader geopolitical cause to disseminate democracy and transform the globe according to... liberal-democratic principles…” (2008, p. 50). There is a belief that the Iraq invasion has changed the landscape for interventionist wars. It is now seemingly permissible to launch humanitarian intervention wars with an underlying secondary intent such as to remove a tyrant and force regime change. This is arguably what occurred in Iraq in 2003 and Libya in 2011. Not only does this contradict the notion of state sovereignty but also several just war principles. On the other hand, if humanitarian intervention were permissible as a just cause to war, perhaps the removal of a head of state and regime change can be seen as step that is proportional and necessary for the protection of individuals in that

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Legalist Paradigm Analysis

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The exception of intervention in other conflicts is categorized into three main subfields. Primarily, war is justified when a set of boundaries contains two or more political communities, one of whom is engaged in the struggle for independence. This is the issue of secession or “national liberation.” Subsequently, the next revision is that of counter-intervention stating when the boundaries have already been crossed by the military force of another foreign power, intervention is justified. The last revision to the Legalist Paradigm deems a just intervention when there are large scale violations of human rights within a set of boundaries.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    March 23, 1999 marked the beginning of the NATO bombing campaign against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia lasting three months. The rationale for the campaign was on the basis of “humanitarian intervention.” It was said to be in prevention of the ethnic cleansing of the Kosovar Albanians of Siberia by the authoritative regime of Slobodan Milosevic. The moral justification of this conflict has since been contested by a variety of theoretical schools of thought. This essay will use the revisions to the Legalist Paradigm presented by Walzer to prove the moral impermissibility of NATOs intervention in Kosovo.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This particular function of Empire is often characterized by the prevalence of “just war” (Hardt 12), or the idea that a sovereign nation has a right to wage war and because of a threat either to safety or to way of life. The authors contend that Empire is in some ways even more globalizing than the Imperialist ethos which preceded it. It incorporates the blurring of boundaries which traditionally delineated sovereign hosts of power. Hardt and Negri cite a resurgence of this kind of war in modern times, with a particular twist based on the new form of Empire: the new form of just war is based less on the “activity of defense or resistance” but has rather become an “activity that is justified in itself,” meaning that war conducted by those with power over those without power in pursuit of gain is characteristic of the new form of Empire (Hardt 13). This characterizes a certain disregard for sovereignty and individual nation’s authority, a signal of the dissolving borders and flow of power between previously established…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay “The Enemies of Empire,” the author discusses an argument that develops between two different perspectives on imperialism and anti- imperialism after the Spanish- American War. He mentions that many Americans supported the idea of expansionism while others opposed it. He asserts that the people who supported the idea of imperialism believed that it was an American duty to intervene in other countries affairs in order to liberate the oppressed. Conversely, he states that other people were against these expansionists for America being involved in foreign wars for various reasons. Likewise, the author of the article “Totaling Up; It Was an Unjust War” explains the main justifications that President Bush offered to go to war with Iraq.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many people would agree with this perspective, the intervention of military in international affairs is justified by a country’s national interest and calculations. Alternatively, some may…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rather, now that the war’s proponents are relying so significantly on a humanitarian rationale for the war, the need to assess this claim has grown in importance. We conclude that, despite the horrors of Saddam Hussein’s rule, the invasion of Iraq cannot be justified as a humanitarian intervention. After, I discussed some of the important aspects that related by humanitarian intervention. Also, some of the important ways that international community could use to stop humanitarian crisis.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Michael Walzer makes a compelling argument in his article on global crisis, “the Argument about Humanitarian Intervention”. Walzer argues that humans have always been fighting each other and causing global problems. He claims that with today’s technology it has never been simpler to kill large numbers of people, if one has the resources of course. Walzer poses the question that in the event of a humanitarian crisis, such as cases of severe war crimes or ethnic cleansing, to what degree should the rest of the world respond? In Walzer’s article he discusses four major questions.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My main argument is that, while the U.S. has a responsibility to protect, it must not take rash action when it comes to launching a military intervention into another country. I argue that since human rights are a modern construct, and a nebulous one at that, they should not be used to justify an ill-advised campaign (particularly a unilateral one). I argue that first the U.S. must make every effort to prevent the occurrence of genocide through diplomatic and economic tools. I then argue that in order for a military intervention to take place, the U.S. must have an internal partner and would preferably have a multilateral coalition. I go on to assert that intervention must be logistically possible as well as hold domestic support.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Just War Theory, there is a list of reasons when and why it is okay to go to war, and kill in war. I believe that it is okay to kill in war due to the fighting for your own survival, fighting for the protection of others and what is stated in the Bible. When in your home country, you are forced to see you people living in harmony and peace, or see them perish due to the fact that you cannot protect them. George Orwell has stated that, "Those who “abjure” violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf." So, those who have never been to war and had to make the decision to protect their country and countrymen, do not know what it feels like to make this decision.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Humanitarian Definition

    • 2167 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Humanitarian action and human rights are intrinsically based on morals however these morals are culturally based. This raises issues in how there can be a ‘Universal’ declaration of human rights when human rights are totally subjective to the culture they are applied within. The American Anthropology Association (AAA) argues culture is imperative in the capacity for humanity (AAA, 1999). With morals and values being at the basis of the creation and production of culture, then the way in which rights and humanitarian interventions are justified and played out is largely reliant on the cultural context. Thus this essay will argue human rights and humanitarian intervention cannot be universal as they are intrinsically reliant on moral norms…

    • 2167 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Just War theory is a set of educated guidelines for determining justifiable and unjustifiable implementation of tactics during armed conflict. Many Just War theories also attempt to convey how the use of arms might be altered, restrained, made more humane, and ultimately aimed towards establishing lasting peace and justice. The Just War Theory stands by the notion of fighting for peace, that is, when all options are weighed. What makes sense in theory, many times fail when put into action. World War I was touted in the U.S. as the “solution to end war.”…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Today, technological advances in warfare have challenged the foundational principles of Just War Theory and generated scrutiny around ethical behavior in combatant environments. Just War Theory refers to a set of rules that a sovereign state is expected to follow before engaging in war, during war, and after war—jus ad bellum, jus in bellum, and jus post bellum, respectively. With the increased employment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) or drone strikes under the Obama Administration, one may doubt the morality of these attacks. Specifically, the aims of this essay seek to answer the question on whether or not drone strikes in Yemen adhere to the principles of Just War Theory. Considering the unprecedented and regular use of this technology,…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is one of the most important arguments, for explaining the invasion of Iraq by the USA, i.e. from the liberal perspective this was the war not for American benefits, but more for the defeating the dictatorship. Humanitarian intervention is a liberal foreign policy, according to which if the state discriminates its citizens, international community may intervene with the purpose of preventing further violence on individuals (Baylis et al, 2008). In case of Iraq war, many liberalists emphasize on the human rights of Iraqi population and justify the USA’s invasion as the war against severe despotism with the aim of liberation of Iraqi people (Baylis et al, 2008). One of the most famous liberal theorists, Robert Keohane claims that the ‘boarder’ between self-defence and humanitarian intervention becomes vaguer and nowadays military confrontation may be: ‘described as both self-defence and as humanitarian or public-spirited’ (Baylis et al, 2008). Another aspect, which is extremely important in liberalism for this case is the spread of democracy in the Middle East.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    America's Responsibility

    • 2459 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Ali Tahabrown Mr. Seehafer Humanities II: American Studies 13 April 2016 America's Responsibility Winston Churchill once said, "Where there is great power, there is great responsibility. " By enforcing the regime change that brought down Saddam Hussein, America saves 60,000 lives every year (Alexander).…

    • 2459 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And The Cold War

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Prominent in realist theory is the concept of anarchy. Anarchy in international politics is defined by Mearsheimer as a system of ‘independent political units (states) that have no central authority above them’ (Mearsheimer 1994). Such a system promotes the concepts of self-help, statism and survival which suggest that war is the result of independent states fighting for power and national interest in order to survive. Given that the world has only been at peace for 8% of all of recorded history (Hedges 2003), these concepts are of great significance to realist in order to dissect war and understand why it is so prominent in international politics. Therefore, the bases of this essay will be formed using the aforementioned concepts to outline…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays