Immanuel Kant Deontological Ethics

Improved Essays
Luke Schuh
Deontological Ethics Immanuel Kant’s theory of deontological ethics or duty ethics states that we are morally obligated to follow a set of rules regardless of what the final result may be. Kant believes that the world needs to be moral and from this he considers that we need sound motivation for those moral choices. This leads Kant to create the categorical imperative, derived solely from reason, as a route to make those moral choices. This imperative, or command, is categorical because it applies unconditionally across the entirety of a category that contains people with a rational will. Kant first formulates the categorical imperative as a descriptive project when he sets up a procedure for determining moral actions and then later
…show more content…
From this, Kant reasons that the only way someone can have moral worth is if his or her actions are motivated by morality and duty rather than by the final result. This statement leads to Kant’s second formulation of the categorical imperative, which states that we should “act in such a way that we treat humanity, whether in our own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means” (Kant, 429). That is to respect other people as having a rational will and because of that rational will not using the person for an advantage. This is because using that person doesn’t allow for him or her to reach his or her maximum potential. Kant arrives at this kingdom of ends from the universalization test because once natural law is seen as universal law; we then recognize that that law equally binds all rational beings. We must then recognize those rational beings as moral agents and treat them as ends, not as a means to an …show more content…
This is the idea that we are the authors of our morals laws as well as the ones who follow those laws. There are two potential ways that this could be possible. The first possibility, such as in the way the Constitution works, is that we as a group of rational people created a moral law in the past and because we have now joined that group of rational people we are bound to that law. Another, and in my eyes, better conclusion for this statement by Kant is that every one of us becomes an author of the moral law when we assess a choice through the universalization test. When a choice passes the system and is determined to be moral, then it the person, who knows the purpose behind it and who put it through the test, that wrote that moral law. It is then said that any rational being can be an author for any moral law and there can multiple authors for any of those laws. We are bound to these moral laws, which are objective and exceed our subjective selves, willingly, yet we are still free when it is due to our sense of duty. The binding to these laws actually enhances our freedom in a sense, because when we know the limitations of what we can or can’t do it allows us to explore other viable options and act more

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “On the night of April 18, Gage sent 700 British soldiers to Concord to seize patriot supplies there.” The very next morning, the first shots of the American Revolution were fired (Library of Congress). To this day, 240 years later, it remains unclear which side, the British or the colonial minutemen, fired the first shell. The Americans quickly spread word of the events and garnered the support of the Continental Congress, and thus began the first stages of the American Revolution. On that fateful night, what caused General Thomas Gage to amass 700 troops in order to arrest two citizens, John Hancock and Samuel Adams?…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant lays out his theory for making moral decisions. Unlike many other philosophers, Kant focuses not on the consequences of actions, but on the maxim in which the action was performed; in addition, Kant also tries to find his moral theory a priori instead of through empirical experience. He attempts to formulate a theory grounded through pure reason in which he bases his moral law on something that has never been experienced before that we are able to imagine and strive towards. Kant’s theory circles around the idea of a Supreme Principle of Morality called the Categorical Imperative which encompasses the Formula of Universal Law and the Formula of Humanity; all of which I will…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While each rational being may be another’s means, also individually they are their own end. Here Kant makes an argument that autonomy is possible, when the “Kingdom of Ends” is the overriding law of society. The kingdom of ends allows for a “legal system,” a system of universal laws authored by rational beings. Beings within this legal system are the lawmakers, but are also subject to these laws (Kant p101).…

    • 1856 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Immanuel Kant’s “Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals” he was trying to persuade us to understand how to construct the nature of the human mind and its universal laws of ethics. Kant wrote this book basically to explain the rules of justice and how can the human mind be virtuous. He helps us to understand the morality of your individual human rights as well as justice. Rights are enforceable good claims against others, so in expressing that others have a commitment to regard my rights we are at the same time insisting my entitlement to utilize constrain to secure my rights. Kant explains his morality philosophy as the good versus the bad.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant created Kantian ethics, an example of deontological moral theory which places focus on the morality of the action itself, rather than the morality of the consequences of the actions, or the morality of the person who committed the actions. Kant believed in the existence of an inherent good will within humans that would lead them to make moral and just decisions. Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, on the other hand, completely rejects the idea of an inherent goodness and instead places focus on the idea that humans have a natural instinct to survive and be victorious and that the victors of social, economic, and political battles would determine what is good and bad. Nietzsche 's criticism of Kant centers on its acceptance of duty as…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant is a firm believer of duty based ethics, meaning that one’s morality is defined by ones motives. Thus, Kant believes that an action should be performed simply because it’s the right thing to do, and for no other reason. Also, Kant states that duty defines intrinsic value, meaning that a person’s motives for what they do should have ends within themselves, without consequences or desired satisfaction being built into their actions. Kant also states the one should act so that the maximum of your action can and should be made into universal law, expressing that the actions of your motives should apply to everyone in the same way. Thus, bringing us to the fact that action from duty has to be an categorical imperative, meaning that everyone should and would be able to act the same way, sharing equal positioning.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, as long as the moral law does not depend on our desires, it consists of what is called ‘categorical imperatives’ in Kant’s philosophical works (Gakuran…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant developed what is called the categorical imperative to test if one’s action is in accordance with moral law. To use the categorical imperative, one must propose an action, for example, being honest. Next, the proposed action is put into a statement or maxim. The proposed action then develops into “I will always be honest”. From this, one imagines a world where this maxim is followed by everyone.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In other words, all individuals must uphold an unconditional good, to do this, one must be a rational person. A key factor relating to Kant’s theory, is that an individual may not interfere with another’s’ goals or objectives that a person may have. In addition, Kant discusses the moral rules that all autonomous and rational…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant implies that any being that has autonomy and rationality should always treat others with autonomy and rationality as an end. Yet, Kant doesn 't clearly state how people are supposed to treat other humans as an end. The Principle of Humanity doesn 't give us a road map on how to apply a moral action. Kant would most likely reply to this response by saying that people have autonomy and rationality and should know what the moral action of a situation is. Even with Kant’s response, there are still many situations that we might not be able to determine what the moral action is.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He concluded by saying that only one thing that is truly good, and it is good will chose out of a feeling of moral duty. The principle believed that the good must be obeyed in all situations and circumstances if our behavior is to observe moral laws. It is seen as unconditional obligation, irrespective of our will or desires, and irrespective of any consequences which might come out from the action. He equally states that when an action is not done with the motive of duty, it is without moral value and therefore it is meaningless.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    My Moral Philosophy

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Moral philosophy is the study of moral judgments or value placed on decision about what is right or wrong, good or bad, just or on just. Business philosophy is the standard, principle or policy placed on who may behave outside the norms of organizational culture, emphasis upon ethical behavior enables employees to know how they should react when faced with ethical dilemmas and the consequences of their actions. MY PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY. As an individual, I believe that keeping a low profile life is very vital to me in a sense that people around me irrespective of their cultural, ethnical and political background.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays