Prospero goes on to recount how he “pitied [Caliban,] took pains to make [him] speak, taught [him] each hour one thing or other” (1.2.3535). Shakespeare’s rhythmic construction of these lines, employing changing, yet related, assonance and consonance, emphasizes Prospero’s selfperception as a benevolent superior. Prospero goes so far as to state that Caliban would “not ... Know [his] own meaning,” had Prospero not “endowed [his] purposes with words that made them known” (1.2.3556, 3578). Ironically, Prospero shows himself to be selfimportant, while exemplifying his good deeds. Prospero’s consistent selfelevation and his depreciation of Caliban, while informing the audience to his biased selfunderstanding, establishes the idea of Prospero and Caliban as foils. Thus, in the opinion of Prospero, Caliban no longer deserves his sovereignty as consequence of his intrinsic nature, leaving Prospero excused of any immoralities in his treatment of
Prospero goes on to recount how he “pitied [Caliban,] took pains to make [him] speak, taught [him] each hour one thing or other” (1.2.3535). Shakespeare’s rhythmic construction of these lines, employing changing, yet related, assonance and consonance, emphasizes Prospero’s selfperception as a benevolent superior. Prospero goes so far as to state that Caliban would “not ... Know [his] own meaning,” had Prospero not “endowed [his] purposes with words that made them known” (1.2.3556, 3578). Ironically, Prospero shows himself to be selfimportant, while exemplifying his good deeds. Prospero’s consistent selfelevation and his depreciation of Caliban, while informing the audience to his biased selfunderstanding, establishes the idea of Prospero and Caliban as foils. Thus, in the opinion of Prospero, Caliban no longer deserves his sovereignty as consequence of his intrinsic nature, leaving Prospero excused of any immoralities in his treatment of