Guilty By Reason Of Insanity

Improved Essays
The 21st century has evolved into a world twisted by the images presented in the media. Widely known issues in our culture often have inaccurate portrayals affecting our understanding and perceptions of real world problems. In particular, the “Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity” plea has become an infamous legal concept as an outcome of its’ use in courtrooms and entertainment mediums throughout Hollywood. Successful NGRI verdicts of trials following notorious crimes are broadcasted on the news, only bringing awareness to the crime but never the steps or reasoning in determining insanity, falsely depicting that anyone can plea insane. For example, the news over Andrea Yates drowning her children spread like wildfire across the nation, horrifying Americans. Her crime caused such a stir that programs all over the media started covering and dramatizing her story with the intention of engaging the audiences’ attention. One particular type of segment was a Law & Order episode that seemed to resemble the Yates’ case. The episode titled “Magnificat” part of the Law & Order: Criminal Intent series follows an investigation after a car bombing which included Doreen Whitlock and her four young sons. …show more content…
The suspects of the incident shifted throughout the episode, until coming to the conclusion that the mental state of the mother was unhealthy after obtaining her confession. At the end of the trial of Doreen Whitlock, the judge sentences to her to a conviction was 25 years to be spent at a mental facility due to her successful acquittal. With the rise and importance of mental health, it is vital for the American public to understand the misrepresentations of the legal system in our society. In this paper, I will talk about the how this specific Law & Order episode depicts the “Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity” defense.
The Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity is attainable with no difficulty. One argument presented by this episode is that the NGRI plea is feasible effortlessly. It fails to show the tedious procedures in how insanity is determined, accurately. For instance, a scene is displayed in the setting of Bellevue Hospital where Doreen is being interrogated by detectives Robert Goren and Alexandra Eames. In the presence of her lawyer, Doreen is physically distraught when she is confronted about a tampered space heater that was returned to a department store, weeks before the incident. The detectives had already discovered that she was responsible for the temperament, which if the space heater had been used it would have emitted carbon monoxide, exposing anyone in a close vicinity to carbon monoxide poisoning. In efforts to defend herself, Doreen confesses “But I couldn’t do it. There was something wrong with me.” This confession not only admits to the temperament of the heater but as well as the confirmation that she had thoughts of premeditative murder and knew right from wrong. Contradicting, what the insanity defense is truly meant for and the reasoning behind it. Based on my research, this inaccurate representation of the insanity plea does not show the lengthy process and requirements that acquiring a successful acquittal from the court involves. The insanity defense is a criminal defense used to claim that the defendant cannot be held accountable for the crime because of legal insanity. Cornell University Law School defines the insanity defense as “a person accused of a crime can acknowledge that they committed the crime, but argue that they are not responsible for it because of their
…show more content…
Typically, restricted to state circumstances, the M'Naghten Rule is the proper method for examining legal insanity. The test concentrates on the individual’s capability of not knowing what they were doing or that their actions were wrong. In order for the M’Naghten Rule to prove insanity FindLaw.com explains the rule as “The M'Naghten Rule (or test) focuses on whether a criminal defendant knew the nature of the crime or understood right from wrong” (“The M'Naghten Rule”). Hence, if the perpetrator was not able to distinguish their actions from right and wrong, then, under those circumstances, they cannot be held accountable for the crime. Alternately, the plea is pursued to lessen the severity of the verdict and to be followed up with psychotherapy. Dr. Mark Nolan, Senior Lecturer at ANU College of Law, says that the NGRI plea “enables defendants to avoid criminal liability and standard criminal punishment” (Nolan

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After the guilty verdict, but before sentencing, the State abandoned its request for the death penalty in light of false testimony by one of its expert psychiatric witnesses. In2002 she went to trial and she was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 40 years. The verdict was overturned on appeal. Her case placed the M'Naghten Rules with the Irresistible Impulse Test, a legal test for sanity, under close public scrutiny in the United States. In order to rules a case under the M'naghten rules there;s have to be clean proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason , from the disease of the mind , as not to know the nature and quality of the act, the party accused was doing or if he did know it , that he did not know what was wrong ..…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A loved one, killed. This is many people’s worst nightmare. The loved ones of the mentally ill are in constant worry of this, knowing that the person they love could suffer from a sudden psychotic breakdown and put their lives at risk without realizing it. The fact that the mentally ill cannot control themselves and may engage in criminal activity as a result has led a struggle for police departments as people who are unaware of their actions - essentially innocent people - are killed. Through an effective argument that utilizes multiple appeals, Pete Earley suggests the necessity of special police forces to handle mentally ill suspects.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ultimately, only a jury can decide the issue of insanity, which in itself may be the most controversial aspect about the insanity defense. In other words, people who have no training in the field, rarely come into contact with the mentally ill and have a minimal understanding of the issues involved, make legal, long-lasting judgments that are frequently based on shifting criteria. If he were to be denied the opportunity to use the defense, there would need to be a secondary set of defenses which allow the charges against him to be greatly mitigated. The team would have to consider accepting a plea to lessen the time he would ultimately be incarcerated. It would be unfavorable but because of the fact that there was actus reus but lacked mens rea, it would be hard to get him not have him serve any time at…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2003, Andre Thomas viciously attacked and killed his ex-wife and her two children, and was sentenced to death row. His defense argued that he was not eligible for death row because of his mental state. The court ignored the argument and passed it off, saying that they were using his illness as an excuse to “get out of” maximum punishment. As demonstrated in this case, mental illness is not given the attention it deserves when determining a sentence. Cases such as these have aroused concern how fair the criminal court is towards the mentally ill.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bryan Stevenson, an established lawyer with a degree from Harvard Law School and an author of his own personal memoir titled Just Mercy, constantly battles the problems within the criminal justice system. In Stevenson’s memoir, he makes multiple arguments about the unfairness and the need for change within the criminal justice system. One such argument is that of individuals with mental health problems not being properly diagnosed during their trials, therefore receiving lengthy prison sentences such as life in prison. In order to convey his message about the neglect of the mentally ill in American prisons, Stevenson uses numbers, as well as stories that pull at the heartstrings of his readers. Just Mercy, Bryan Stevenson’s memoir was written…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A person’s life has been heinously taken due to no fault of their own. Family and friends of the deceased have mourned, children have lost a parent, parents lost a child, and wives lost a husband. There is no way to ease their pain but, all they want is justice but, will they get it? When the murderer is finally caught the family is elated with joy and anticipate justice will prevail. But, there’s a catch, as the suspect’s defense attorney is claiming he was insane at the time the crime was committed and intends to plead just that.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some people are up against the concept of insanity defense where they believe everyone who commits crime must take the criminal responsibility for their deviant behavior. On the other hand, there are group of people who believe the NCRMD is necessary in our criminal justice system, in order to sustain the equality for mentally ill person. Thus, the question of whether NCRMD is necessary in our criminal justice system is not a black or white question where there is a clear answer. However, the truth is that the NCRMD defense has created in our criminal justice system with a good purpose of providing equal rights for the mentally disordered people. This criminal defense does not exists and works as the sink hole for the accused to easily escape or avoid his or her criminal responsibility.…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I, Judge Awotwi, presided over the mock trial State Prosecution vs. Macbeth, and it is my duty to uphold the rule of law and instruct true justice upon this issue. The defendant entered a plea of insanity due to delusional compulsion before this court on October 24, 2017, after committing beyond a doubt one count of murder and two counts of felony murder. The question is not whether Macbeth committed these crimes, or if he is judged to be found guilty; it is to judge if the defendant “did not have [the] mental capacity to distinguish between right and wrong”, and that is the responsibility of the court (16-3-2). Due to the facts presented in court I have come to a verdict. The defense’s unique argument and main points overwhelmed the predominant…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Not Guilty by reason of insanity” This could be used in a plea in a court of a person charged with a crime who admits the act, but whose attorney says that they were too mentally ill at the time to determine whether it was right or wrong. In the short story, “The Tell Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe it describes a crazy man who kills another man. The story takes place in an old house in the old man’s bedroom. The main character explains to the reader about his obsession of the old man. His obsession is concerning the old man’s “vulture looking” eye.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Her case was one of psychotic; she was depressed, hallucinated and faced religious pressure. Over the years scientists and doctors struggled to find a link between a mental illness and a criminal behavior. In many States in our country lawmakers began to recognize many factors, which play a big role in how individuals control their reasoning ability and behavior. Moreover, many states countrywide have changed its laws accordingly to newly discovered theories.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sociopathy Vs Psychopathy

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The problem associated with this is that fact that because of this the standards to claim insanity were easier to do with the DSM than by the PCL-R. The DSM is what is more commonly used in Frye Jurisdictions. This evidence shows the unequal advantage of how the simplicity of what jurisdiction and individual is in can show significant impact on…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The presence of this plea option has led to controversy in the law world; some think that the plea should be diminished while others notice its necessity. Nevertheless, there are people with mental illness in our society that commit crimes just as those without mental illness do. There should be a system that protects the rights of those with mental illness, but there is a lot of grey area with the current system in place because it is difficult to tell if the person was not in a sane state at the time the crime took place when the trial often occurs months later. Those who plea guilty by reason of insanity are required to go through an extensive psychological…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article on A Crime of Insanity (Frontline, 2002), describes the whole process of determining the causes of action for individuals who have a mental illness at the time of committing heinous crimes. This article, in particular, covers the story of Ralph Tortorici, who has a history of mental disorder from as early as his adolescent years. Moreover, Ralph suffers from regular acute paranoid delusions and psychotic behavior, which prompted him to seek help from the University health facility and also from a New York state trooper. On both occasions, he complains of a government conspiracy which he feels is responsible for implanting a computer microchip on him. Having failed to secure any help from anyone, he takes matters into his own hands…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Serial Killers Essay

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited

    According to law, a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” if they do not have the capacity to know right from wrong, therefore;…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited
    Superior Essays