Furman V. Georgia Case Study

Improved Essays
Review of Furman V. Georgia
Furman v. Georgia Supreme Court decision sent a ripple through the standard way of thinking in the United States legal system, by causing a nationwide moratorium on capital punishment that lasted from 1972-1976. The ruling itself did not provide any new information, it only demonstrated what then general society already knew was true, it was only a first time it was affirmed in the court of law. This court ruling showed that the legal powers the be, were in greater part paying attention to what was going on and felt that they had a legal and moral duty to find as they did in stating that there had been an unjust means to which the death penalty had been utilized.
There were three paramount cases that the Furman ruling was evaluated against, two for rape and one for murder, but subsequently the Eighth Amendment, which protects against “cruel and unusual punishment,” and the Fourteenth Amendment, which ensures due process under the law were each considered when the Supreme Court provided its findings on the matter. There were obvious arguments both for and against capital punishment, but regardless of the reasons for such a consequence, one thing had to be certain. The rationale behind its use and the method of its use must be of the greater good to society and it must be applied equally to all. This Supreme Court ruling stated to the contrary, and said that capital punishment was being given at disproportionate rate across the races. Persons of certain races and income levels seemed to be getting the death penalty while others who were of the upper echelon of the social and economic order appeared to be less likely to receive such a harsh penalty when found guilty for the same offenses. Ideally, this Supreme Court decision was to lead to an end of capital punishment or at least put an end to the racial injustices that were often the foundation to which these punishments were given out. This Supreme Court ruling did not stop the practice of issuing capital punishment, nor did it close the gap on the percentages of races sentenced to capital punishment for the same crimes. In essence, what this court ruling did was forced the states to ultimately reexamine their own individual policies and procedures for giving capital punishment. It gave defense lawyers one last ray of hope in defensing appeals
…show more content…
Georgia decision noted that the use of the death penalty over the years appeared to show a pattern of bias, it was not given the same for people having committed the same crime on every occasion and it was implemented on persons of color far more than it was on whites. Due to the clear bias of the death penalty application, one justice was noted as saying it was “unusual and that it lacked it due process”. The death penalty lacked in due process simply because it was not applied the same across the board; there was not clear cut definition for who would qualify for it. Without a clear and precise set of determinants, one could be ambiguous in the reasons for the application of a death penalty, thus allowing for the overtone of racism or other poor moral judgements to be factored in to the reason for individual trails and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The actuality of the case of State v. Stewart consist of a variety of mental, physical and emotional abuse in which Peggy Stewart had been “pushed” in her own mind to kill her husband to escape from his toxic and cruel behavior. As a result, the facts of the case are a wide variety that contributed to Peggy’s “imminent danger” state of mind when deciding whether her actions were truly self-defense. These include the abuse at hand, physiological trauma that Peggy experienced, and professional opinions about Peggy’s actions. An important factor of the case is Peggy Stewart’s significant abuse by her husband, Mike. Additionally, Mike’s abuse was not only to Peggy; but also to her daughter, Carla.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    State V. Evans Case Study

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case of State v. Evans, 671 N.W.2d 720, (2003). , we see the distress of the victim that suffered from both harassment and stalking from her predator for a period that span more than three years (Brody and Acker, 2010). The harassment aspect that Hubert Evans summited the victim, Rebecca Arnold, to started out at a very slow rate with it become more intense and leading to stalking over years leading to the arrest of Mr. Evans and criminal conviction for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010). The criminal charges were heard by a judge and jury where Mr. Evans gained a criminal conviction for the charges that he faced in the trial. The criminal conviction of Mr. Evans lead to his appeal to the State of Iowa Appeals court to evaluate the case as it relates to the state statute for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010).…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Name: Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991) Statement of Facts: The defendant Payne broke into his girlfriend’s neighbor’s house and tried to engage in sexual activity with her, she refused then Payne became violent. He killed Charisse, a mother of two and he killed her daughter. He also severely injured her son also by stabbing him numerous times.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Furlow, 04-CV-5887 Our File No. 5-987 Statement of Facts: John Brown sued his dentist, Dr. Thomas Furlow, claiming he was injured as a result of Dr. Furlow’s failure to extract an infected tooth on August 3. John Brown ignored Dr. Furlow’s recommendation to return because his tooth was infected. Mr. Brown then went on vacation and while on vacation he passed out due to infection, pain, and the infection spreading. Mr. Brown incurred medical expense and loss of wages. Furlow was served with a complaint on March 1.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Question 1) Oregon vs. Smith, is a United States Supreme Court case that determined wither or not the state could reject unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state’s narcotic prohibition, even if the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Legally states have the right to accommodate some illegal acts done in pursuit of religious beliefs, but they are not required to make accommodations. This made The Supreme Court decision a major event in Native American religious beliefs, the case attracted widespread support form not only Native religious beliefs but also voodoo religious beliefs. Oregon v. Smith had a diverse range of religious groups eager to protect their own religious freedom and their use of spiritual medicine.…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is the death penalty in violation of the eighth amendment? The case, Furman v. Georgia took place in 1972. William Henry Furman was burglarizing a home when he was discovered. In an attempt to escape…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The struggle between the Native Americans and the Americans was extremely relevant and volatile during the 1800’s. The struggle escalated in 1830 when Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act (“Worcester”). As a result, new issues arose on a fight that had been around for centuries between the Native Americans and the Americans. One major collateral outcome of this act is the Supreme Court case, Worcester vs. Georgia. This case and the results of it turned out to be a major step forward for the Native Americans fighting for their rights and freedom during this time.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The petitioner believed the eighth amendment and the fourteenth amendment were violated as they stated Furman, the person who was found guilty, was given the death penalty. The reason this was an issue was that the petitioner found the use of the death penalty was inconsistent with other trials that were similar to the trial Furman was in. The petitioner argued that there was discrimination amongst the use of the death penalty in Georgia stating that more blacks had received the death penalty than whites or any other racial group in similar…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Georgia. The United States Supreme Court had requested the writ of certiorari to further their decision and also decided to affirm the state's decision, the court affirmed the previous sentence seven to two in favor of the state on July 2, 1976. The United States Supreme Court decided to take on the case due to their beliefs and opinions on morals in society. The court wanted to clarify the issue of the death penalty to further emphasize or change the current laws that were in place as well as to terminate further discussion and finalize the court’s decision on cases that included the death penalty seeing as there were many who disagreed with the sentence as well as the sentence's relation to the constitution. On July 2, 1976 the United States Supreme Court had made a decision which had affirmed the previous sentences against Troy Gregg.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Georgia William Henry Furman was convicted of murder in Georgia in 1972. Furman faced death under Georgia’s laws. Petitioner had testified that what he did was accidental, so Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Furman’s conviction. After sifting through the situation, the Georgia Supreme Court declared the death penalty was unfair and unconstitutional.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Gregg v. Georgia was appealed to the Supreme Court. “With a 7 to 2 vote, the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty did not violate the 8th and 14th amendment under all circumstances” (Gregg v. Georgia ,2015).…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision the court decided that the death penalty was cruel punishment that violated the Constitution. Only two justices believed that the death penalty was unconstitutional those being Brennan and Marshal. The rest believed the death penalty is too arbitrary. States now had “to adjust…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Baldus Study

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aside from protecting racially-motivated policing, the Supreme Court has also made it so that claims of racial bias cannot be made in the sentencing process. An example of this can be found in McClesky v. Kemp, where the Supreme Court illustrated that they would tolerate discrimination in the criminal justice system so long as no one explicitly claimed their racial biases (Alexander, 109). In 1987, an African American man named Warren McCleskey was facing the death penalty after being convicted for the murder of a Georgia police officer. Represented by lawyers from the NAACP, McCleskey challenged his sentence by presenting the high court with the Baldus study, an in-depth statistical analysis of Georgia’s death sentencing patterns conducted…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The death penalty continuously falls disproportionately on racial minorities.” (Frank Schmalleger) For instance, when criminals murder whites they are more likely to be sentenced to death than are those who murder blacks. The death penalty should never be influenced by arbitrary and unfair circumstances if the government were upholding it, and since we are only human that is inevitable. For example, in the case of the Boston bombing; Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, had been sentenced to death, but it may have been solely because his case was has held at the same location, Boston, as the…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Supreme Court of Georgia subsequently set aside Defendant’s death sentences on the armed robbery counts, on the basis, that defendants are rarely subject to capital punishment for that crime. The Court upheld defendant’s death sentences with respect to the murder convictions. In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Furman case, which held a death penalty statute to be unconstitutional, because it resulted in death being imposed in an “arbitrary and capricious” manner, the Georgia legislature revised its death penalty statute so that death could only be imposed when the jury had found the presence of specific aggravating factors. This effectively narrowed the class of murderers subject to capital punishment. The new statute created…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays