Fire Arms Criminalization

Improved Essays
“GUNS! GUNS! GUNS!” Did you really think you were safe? Well, you’re not. Firearms are still manufactured, sold, and obtained in Canada. It is fair to say that firearms are not completely illegal in our “peace loving nation”. A complete criminalization of firearms over the globe will benefit citizens everywhere. Criminalizing firearms will reduce death rates, provide people with more security than they could ever imagine, and reduce the universal accessibility to firearms. For these reasons, a complete criminalization of firearms globally will benefit everyone; everywhere.

Firstly, a complete criminalization of fire arms will reduce death rates. A study performed across the United States has shown that, in every 100 people, 88 of
…show more content…
A firearm is like an instant delete button, one moment you’re alive, the next you’re gone; criminalizing fire arms will make killing someone much harder. It removes the freedom from a person to easily end one’s life, thus making homicides more difficult to commit. Statistics have shown in 2010 there were 31 513 deaths caused by fire arms across the United States, 11 015 being homicides (Utah.edu). As u can imagine, 11 015 is no small number, let alone that they’re lives of people. 11 015 is very close to the amount of people the Air Canada Center can hold, that is the amount of people that perished due to homicides. As a result, the US has one of the highest homicide rates in all developed countries, only exceeded by Mexico (Business Insider). In response to these statistics President Obama says, "Once again, innocent people were killed in part because someone who wanted to inflict harm had no trouble getting their hands on a gun," (Obama). Besides homicides, the freedom to bear firearms has also increased suicide rates. A gun to the head is an express train to the light on the other of the …show more content…
The United States of America is the leading manufacture of firearms in the world, producing over 10 million guns of all sorts every year (Shooting industry). Canada does not produce nearly as many firearms as the US. However, we share one of the longest and most unprotected borders in the world, this makes smuggling weapons into Canada much easier. Making firearms more accessible. The legality of firearms is like a virus that continuously spreads, and doesn’t stop until everything is infected. Dealers smuggle weapons over border all time, giving all countries accessibility to firearms. Therefore a global criminalization of fire arms is in need. Over the course of the years Canada has been loosening gun restriction laws. For example, in 1995 Canada instated a Firearms act which required a license and registry of all long guns (rifles, shotguns and etc.). But, in 2012 the Canadian government ruled that registration of firearms would no longer be required, this means that firearms cannot be tracked; the government is blind like a bat, unable to get a good depiction of the issue of firearms. Due to the pressure American gun manufacturers, there have been many pro-firearms activist attempting to challenge Bill C-68; the firearms act. This will lead to a nation like the USA; where firearms are available to everyone, through private dealers and shops. And similarly the consequences will be

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Katrina Herrera Mrs. Clark AP English 3 08 February 2018 Argumentative Essay Final Draft: Gun Control Gun control is one of the most controversial topics in American politics. More than one-third of Americans in the United States own firearms in their households. It is estimated that more than thirty-thousand people are shot each year due to murders, accidents, police intervention, suicide attempts and suicide. Gun control laws are not strict enough for the safety of our society. The purchase and possession of firearms should be banned in order to prevent potential public shootings, protect the environment, and decrease suicide and death rates.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gun Control Laws In Canada

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Across North America, the use of guns and firearms were very controversial and still are till this day. Many Canadian politicians and citizens have looked down on the United States their gun control laws. On December 6th, 1989, an eye-opening tragedy for occurred. Twenty-five year old Marc Lepine walked into the University of Montreal’s Ecole Polytechnique, murdered 13 female engineering students, a woman staff member and killed himself. The massacre left the victims’ family in devastation and made many Canadians question how safe the nation was from firearms.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the founding fathers of the United States wrote the Constitution, they added the Bill of Rights which is a set of the first the ten amendments of to the Constitution. The second of these amendments, states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (U.S Const. Amend II). Particularly, this amendment is interpreted in many ways; some pro gun-control groups say only militias are allowed to bear arms, and pro gun groups say that every citizen is allowed to bear arms.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relatively speaking, Canada is a country that has managed to keep gun violence to a minimum rate compared to other countries. However, the acts of one man on a murderous rampage sparked an outrage that lead to the development of the Long Gun Registry with the hope that it would diminish the availability of weaponry to criminally minded individuals. The Long Gun Registry was not successful in targeting criminals, as it actually only targeted law abiding citizens and homicide rates actually dropped after the registry was abolished. Police checked the database often; however, they did not find it helpful nor something they could trust in their work.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Restricting gun laws negatively impacts Canada’s economy because it reduces the amount of government revenue received each year and creates the possibility of unemployment for people in the firearm industry. In 1996, a report made by Statistics Canada shows that over 1.5 million citizens over the age of 15 participated in hunting and other outdoor related sports, generating $824 million. These events additionally led to an increase of foreign visitors (Reeneboog). This demonstrates how gun related activities has led to a wealthier government that can now provide the public with more resources. This also displays how these tools are not used for the purpose of harming, but helping citizens.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gun Control In Canada

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are three types of firearms in Canada; "non-restricted," "restricted" and "prohibited". Non-restricted firearms are hunting and sporting rifles, shotguns and airguns with an overall length of 660mm or more. Restricted firearms include many handguns and other firearms which do not meet the specifications for non-restricted firearms. Prohibited firearms include firearms that are fully automatic. According to the database there are 726,082 restricted firearms and…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Gun Laws

    • 2376 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Guns are used all around the world, but here in the United States, we need to keep our gun usage limited with gun laws. Gun laws are put into action to make sure firearms are used responsibly; however, people will always find a way to break these laws no matter how many are made. Our Second Amendment, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”, gives U.S. citizens the right to own a weapon and use it for the right reasons. Gun laws will not reduce the amount of gun deaths in the U.S. because gun laws do not determine crime; gun ownership determines crime numbers. There were 460,000 gun deaths in the U.S. between 1999-2013 and this was the 12th leading cause of death.…

    • 2376 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Counter Gun Control Laws

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages

    To counter the gun control laws, through the restriction of guns, harshly punishing of the illegal guns, and enforcing the laws for gun registration, there will be a decrease in the total number of guns in our streets. As it is risky to sell or buy guns, individuals will find it difficult to possess guns and in overall, there will be a decrease in homicide deaths. Besides, it is unrealistic for anyone to hope that one day there will be no gun crime. However, it does not mean that the government should do nothing as its citizens are gunned down each day. All shootings might not be prevented by stronger gun laws; nevertheless, it’s virtually inarguable that the laws cannot reduce gun crimes in the longer period.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Not the Solution Increased Gun Control in the United States is absurd, useless, and unnecessary. In order to increase safety all throughout the United States time and effort must not be spent towards limiting gun owners of their rights. The tragic rash of school, religious, and workplace shootings has turned up the heat on the public conversation about guns. In nearly all of these cases gun laws would not have stopped the shooters from obtaining a firearm.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Since Canada’s prime minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal party rose to power, they have been proposing stricter gun control, such as repealing changes made by Bill C-42 that allow restricted and prohibited weapons to be freely transported without a permit, requiring enhanced background checks for anyone seeking to purchase a handgun or other restricted firearm, requiring firearms vendors to keep records of all firearms inventory and sales to assist police in investigating firearms trafficking and other gun crimes and so on. They believe stricter gun control can “get handguns and assault weapons off our streets” (Liberal, n.d.). Guns are indeed dangerous as they pose a great threat to community; innocent bystanders can be killed or injuired by…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the modern era, firearm usage and sales have proposed a major threat. New tactics and policies have been instituted, but with little positive gain. These “Gun Control” policies have caused more harm than gain among the American people. These policies have had minimal success in obtaining there instituted goals. Gun control is irrelevant and cannot obtain its purpose due too the facts that gun control can never completely eliminate and eradicate firearm violence, gun control institutes irrelevant policies, and gun control shows results opposing its purpose of reducing firearm crime rates, contrary to popular belief.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free use of fire Arms in America Do you know that every 12 hours a person is assaulted in U.S? The FBI shows us that more than 1.2 million people had any kind of gun event in 2013. Also it is known that in 2012 there were more than 14.000 murders by fire arms (1). Even though it is true that there have been several incidents caused by the use of fire arms, the facts mentioned earlier show us that the American people are looking for free gun ownership mostly due to self-protecting reasons, such as to have safe houses, to be prepared against crimes and assaults, and to avoid children abduction. One of the prevalent reasons that American opted to free own gun is having safer houses.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Violence Solution

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Violence in the United States has become one of the largest topics of debate as of recent. Murder has become much too common, and the rate of this crime is only increasing. The solution to violence, more specifically gun violence, is a large point of discussion in the current presidential race. Citizens and politicians alike have very different viewpoints on how this issue should be dealt with, and this disagreement is causing a hindrance to actually solving the problem at hand.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent years, a lot of debate had been going on about the laws pertaining to firearms. Unfortunately, with all of the mass shootings and killings being reported by the media, guns are given a bad reputation. Sadly, many people believe that they should be illegal because they are dangerous and can kill people, but what these people don’t realize is making them illegal will do a lot more harm than good. Guns have created a balance in society and if we were to take them away it could cause a lot of chaos which would result in more crime and more casualties. People deserve the right to bear arms because with proper training one could possibly save his/her life and also protect others.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays