Federalist 47: The Power Of The Government

Improved Essays
Federalist 47 argues that “the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands,” is a form of tyranny. The Foundering Fathers, especially the authors of the Federalist Papers were concerned with the powers of the executive, legislature and judiciary being consolidated into one area, due to the fear of totalitarianism. Thus, in Federalist 51, James Madison that “the power surrendered by the people,” to the United States of America’s government must be divided within the government to allow “ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” Each branch, the executive, legislature and judiciary were given their own respective powers, and if one branch decided to expand their power, the other branches would stop that expansion in order to prevent their own powers being endangered. Therefore, in the U.S. Constitution Article 1 Section 8, Congress is granted the power to declare war and the power to issue letters of marque and reprisal referring to hostilities short of full-scale war. The executive branch in Article 2 Clause 1, states that the president is the “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States,” but it is not stated that the president can declare war. Throughout the executive office has slowly been commencing military actions without seeking a declaration of war from Congress, especially during the 20th Century . Therefore the executive office has usurped control of declaring war from Congress, and a new amendment is needed to restore control of the war powers in the legislature branch. The new amendment must prevent the presidency from going to war or initiating offensive actions without gaining the permission of Congress. In Philadelphia during 1786, the delegates met and debated with each other at the Constitutional Convention to create a new constitution to replace the Articles of Confederation. The Framers transferred executive powers over war and foreign affairs either exclusively to Congress or divided amongst the legislature, executive and judiciary. During the convention the delegates from the 13 states decided to place the power to declare war within the legislature and allow the president to be Commander in Chief of the military during times of war. Delegate’s feared power being centralized in the executive office and becoming similar to the British Monarchy, as Edmund Randolph a delegate from Virginia called executive power “the fetus of monarchy.” The legislature was given sole control over to the power to declare war, but the executive branch explained in Federalist 69 by Alexander Hamilton “would be nominally the same with that of the King of Great Britain, but in substance much inferior to it.” The presidency was designed to have command and direction of the U.S. military, naval forces and “repel sudden attacks.” Since the creation and inception of the U.S. …show more content…
Constitution, the presidency has gained control of the country’s war powers through presidential actions and the failure of Congress to challenge the presidency’s actions. George Washington ordered militias from multiple states to attack Native American Tribes during the Indian Wars without seeking a declaration of war from Congress during the early 18th century. Abraham Lincoln after being elected to the presidency in 1860 the southern states seceded from the U.S. and formed the Confederate States of America. After the Southern states seceded, Lincoln ordered two blockades, the first being from South Carolina to Texas, the second was the ports of Virginia and North Carolina. All of which was done without a declaration of war, and Lincoln defended his actions by stating the “Constitution was nothing without the nation.” The presidency would augment its control of the nation’s war powers after the Supreme Court case U.S. v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation. The case centered on a resolution allowing the president, Franklin Roosevelt to stop the sale of military arms to Bolivia and Paraguay who were engaged in a war. The Curtiss-Wright Corporation legally challenged the resolution and embargo as unconstitutional and eventually the case was decided by the Supreme Court. The Court ruled in favor of Roosevelts actions, stating “the very delicate, plenary and exclusive power of the president is the sole organ of the federal government in the field of international relations.” Thus, the presidency does not require congressional consent to act in foreign

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln closed the Southern ports and seized several boats before Congress had the chance to authorize the Civil War; in order to stop the South from getting imported goods to support the rebellion. Congress declared war with the South several months after the ports closures. The owners of the seized boats brought a suit, claiming the blockade was illegal. The Supreme Court ruled the blockade constitutional, because the President must be able to call out the military or navy when an invasion is imminent. Although, Congress acts alone when declaring war, the President must be able to stop the threat when Congress is not in session.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the constitutional convention, the federalist and the anti-federalist went head to head trying to create new laws for government. Many articles were written by James Madison; these articles were the federalist papers. Within these paper, Madison outlines that the constitution protects against tyranny by dividing power between state and government, by separating government into branches, having a checks and balances system, and having equal state representation among the states. In document A, James Madison states that power is “First divided between two distinct governments, state and federal.” This describes the idea of federalism, where state and federal governments share power; powers like declaring war and printing money belong…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism in the constitution helps guard against tyranny by giving neither the state or central government enough power to tyrannize. According to Doc. A, “James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788”, “power...is first divided between two distinct governments” Also in the Venn diagram on Doc A neither the state or local government possesses all the power. They either have to share a power or only one side gets that certain power. This helps guard against tyranny because it is preventing the central or local government from holding all power.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What would life be akin without the Constitution? Gradually, we would result in a tyrannical world. The thing that the colonists were endeavoring to eschew. What is a tyranny? A tyranny conventionally refers to when a person has an abundance of puissance on their hands, having consummate control.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holding the principle of democracy is paramount and prioritizing the preservation of the United States government of democracy over the power of individuals that leads to tyranny needs to be addressed. Federalist Paper number 47 written by James Madison emphasized the necessity of checks and balances to prevent tyranny, stating the importance of separation of powers. This is the balance of the two. would create cooperation and efficiency within the government as proven by the Supreme Court rulings. Supreme Court decisions are crucial for ensuring efficient government as they uphold the rule of law and maintain separation of powers, ultimately providing stability and democracy in our…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The separated powers established in the Constitution are outlined in Federalist Papers 47 - 51. In Federalist #47 Publius states that Publius argued with this being the case, tyranny can be best prevented by arranging a system in which these powers can not become concentrated. In Federalist #51. Publius claims that the constitutional system makes each institution independent of each other. Furthermore, he states that the powers granted to each institution are in place to keeping the other two institutions in…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The president would be responsible for all the country is at war. The president was also to be the commander-in-chief of all regular United States military forces and of the state soldiers when called into national service. The president would have only occasional command of the state soldiers, and only when authorized by the Congress. (180 words) First,…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Federalist Papers 10 and 51, James Madison offers his insight upon the ends and means of government. He outlines his beliefs on human nature, representation, and separation of power. He sets out to explain the tendency of humans to create factions. These factions take away rights of the minority, hurting the government as a whole. Next, he discusses the advantages of a republic compared to a pure democracy.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution Dbq Analysis

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Separating the powers of the central government and allowing them to control each other equally split the power in the government. Madison explained this separation by stating that “the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other… (The three branches) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” (Doc. C) By separating the central government’s powers, no branch will be able to overpower the others and therefore protects against tyranny.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 78 written by Alexander Hamilton fully examined the judicial branch. In the Federalist Paper, it claimed that the Judicial neither wields the sword of the Executive Branch nor has the purse of the Legislative. The sword is the power of the Executive that controls the nation’s militia and grants the President to be the Commander-in-Chief. The power of the purse grants the Legislative Branch the ability to control the spending and tax policies of the nation. The Judicial Branch, in Hamilton’s words, “had neither FORCE nor WILL but merely judgment,” deeming it to be the least dangerous of the three branches.…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confederation Weaknesses

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Constitution, Watts states that the Constitution “…sets out the basic structure and functions of the various branches of government” (1). These being the executive, legislative and judicial branches. Our founding fathers wanted our country to be free from tyranny of the government and of the people, so they created the three branches of government and the system of checks and balances to make sure that one group does not assume more power than the other. The new structure for our government fixed many of the problems related to the Articles of Confederation. Under the Constitution, the states are no longer sovereign and the laws of the federal government are supreme.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalist Papers were written shortly after the revolution, and many people like Alexander Hamilton wanted to make sure the government doesn’t become too strong. Checks and Balances make sure one branch doesn’t become too powerful. This concept of one branch controlling another is in the United States Constitution today. This is because of the influential people, like Alexander Hamilton who thought up the concept, also helped build the Constitution. It states, “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States……

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    James Madison, on the other hand, reasoned that the best government of the time, as it existed in Britain, and all of the colonies already practiced the same overlapping of powers that was found in the proposed constitution. In Federalist 48, Madison argues that it is this very overlapping of authority that preserves the separation of powers; “The conclusion which I am warranted in drawing from these observations is, that a mere demarcation on parchment of the constitutional limits of the several departments, is not a sufficient guard against those encroachments which lead to a tyrannical concentration of all the powers of government in the same hands” (Hammond, Hardwick, & Lubert, 2007, p. 494). He believed that his opponents had read Montesquieu but had not understood his notion of separation of powers clearly. According to Montesquieu, tyranny results when one branch of government simultaneously holds the powers of another branch. However, Madison argues that Montesquieu "did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other” (Hammond, Hardwick, &…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ratified in March of 1781, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States of America with its first form of government. The Articles called for a loose confederation where each state continued to have its independence along with individual rights and powers. The Articles were less powerful than the state constitutions and were designed to be reactive, causing the national government to be significantly less powerful. After seeing the severe flaws the Articles contained, delegates gathered in a meeting known as the Philadelphia Convention, later named the Constitutional Convention where, unbeknownst to them, the Constitution would be created. Although the Constitution provided the United States with its first effective form of a democratic…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution limited the powers of the federal government in many ways, they did this in order to make sure that their system of government wouldn't get out of control. There is a check for everything, everything is in a system of order, so... here are some ways that The Constitution limited the powers of the federal government. For Example: The Great Compromise.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays