Expert Testimony Admissibility Standards

Decent Essays
Out of the three sets of expert testimony admissibility standards: The Frye Standard, Rule 702, and the Daubert Standard, the last standard is the best option for Florida. Three main reasons why the Daubert Standard is the better option is: 1) It increases the reliability of evidence by examining factors such as error rate, alternative explanations, and peer reviews 2) It has more checks and balances than the Frye Standard’s criteria of just general acceptance. 3) It is more likely to filter out shaky evidence because of the increased strictness of the evidence criteria.
The first reason the Daubert Standard would be the best option for Florida rather than the Frye Standard or Rule 702 would be because of the comparative reliability it affords

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The appellate court reasoned that since Dr. Savage’s testimony is based on “established scientific principals” and satisfies “most of the indicia of scientific reliability,” it is…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Daubert standard is the best choice for determining the admissibility of forensic evidence and expert witnesses in Florida based on the articles provided. The evidence and expert witness testimony that is put forth in Florida litigation should be assessed by the same standards that apply for all rules of evidence in federal courts. Although the Frye standard provides a wide scope as to what can be used as evidence, a stricter set of standards would be more beneficial to the public because it would assure litigants that the science has been proven to be reliable. Frye is based more on the opinion of other experts in the field and what is accepted.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eric Lander Case Summary

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is my belief that we, the scientific community have failed to set rigorous standards to which courts, attorneys, and forensic-testing laboratories can look for guidance--- with the result that some of the conclusions presented to courts are quite unreliable.(p.501) The following court cases Eric Lander was an expert witness for and is examples of human error not only made by technician’s accidentally using contaminated probes, but in addition,…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    COMES NOW the Defendant, Richard John Ohlhaver, by and through counsel, Vernida R. Chaney, and moves this Honorable Court for entry of an order authorizing a competency evaluation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §4241. In support of this motion, the following is submitted: 1. Mr. Ohlhaver is charged with Conspiracy to Commit Theft, 18 U.S.C.§ 371; Theft of Government Property, 18 U.S.C. § 641; Concealment of Event Affecting Right to a Title II Benefit, 42 U.S.C. § 408; Access Device Fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2); and False Statement for use in Determining Right to Title II Benefit Payment, 18 U.S.C. § 408(a)(3). 2.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virginia Cooper Summary

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the research study conducted by Virginia G. Cooper and Patricia A. Zapf, they are looking to come up with potential accurate diagnosis guidelines for declaring if someone is competent or incompetent when coming to their ability to stand trial. This is something they are evaluating, because there are many individuals each year sent for “competency evaluations” and there are no procedures set up from ”the courts for making a competency evaluation” (424). They are hoping to find out what factors reliably determine competency. Cooper and Zapf are specifically looking for potential prejudices of “clinicians” rulings of “468 criminal defendants” from “Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility in 1994 to 1997” on their “competency” by analyzing the…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The courts biggest issues were trying to decide whether a trial court’s erroneous deprivation of a criminal defendant’s choice of counsel entitles him to a reversal of his conviction and should proving the sixth Amendment right to proceed with the counsel of choice depend on whether the deprivation of that right also resulted in compromising a defendants’ right to a fair trial. The majority opinion did not apply the Strickland test because they felt that the defendant could not show or give any reason as to why he felt the counsel was ineffective and that the counsels performance was poorly presented and deficient and the defendant was prejudiced by it. What the Strickland test is actually intended for is that the government must contend that the defendant must at least demonstrate that his counsel of choice would have pursued a different strategy and would have created a :reasonable probability”. In court cases the course can be split into two structures; trial errors and structural errors. Most constitutional errors are trial errors that occur “during the presentation to the jury,” and courts have discretion in deciding whether these trial errors are harmless and warrant a new trial.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is essential to a trials proceedings as witnesses are theoretically…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial review of the hearing officer’s decision is only permissible when there is no supporting evidence and/or the hearing officer used improper legal standards, or as the defense phrases it the decision is erroneous. The defense makes various arguments as to why the decision is erroneous. First off, the defense presents two standards to be considered when determining whether a refusal occurred: 1) whether the individual’s statements and behavior objectively indicted a willingness or unwillingness to take the test; and 2) whether cooperation was timely. Gallion 222-223. Second, the argument is made that since when asked if she was refusing the test she expressly stated, four times, that she was not refusing and when being handcuffed made…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medical Malpractice Theory

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Often times, to prove causation, the claimant may need to seek out expert testimonies to demonstrate that the accused deviated from the standard of care (Stein, 2012), however Hartwell points out that these experts are reluctant to contravene their colleagues…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sociopathy Vs Psychopathy

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is important to address that only 41 forms were turned in out an estimated room full of just at around 100. With these people being their foundation there was one thing that set them apart. Those things being whether their courts had Dubert or Frye jurisdiction in admissibility in evidence. What they found was quit significant. Where the Frye test had made it harder to have evidence admissible compart to Dubert standards.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without full information an attorney cannot do their job in full. Evidence: Eye witness identification: Eyewitness misidentification is the single greatest cause of wrongful convictions nationwide, playing a role in nearly 75% of convictions overturned through DNA testing. While eyewitness testimony can be persuasive evidence before a judge or jury, 30 years of strong…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma? This case is an ethical dilemma because the psychologist is under the belief that the patient’s desire to end her life is not based her own welfare, but her children’s welfare.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What qualifies and disqualifies you as a witness • What qualifies me as a witness is that I have personally suffered being unable to rent or own housing the neighborhood of my choice. I have witnessed people being displaced from their communities because they could not afford to live there anymore. • What disqualifies me as a witness is the fact that I have not been at this advocacy for a short time. B: What is the problem that you are addressing? •…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Importance Of Eyewitness Testimony

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited

    In conclusion, both an eyewitness and the reasonable person provide standards in the court of law that are used in determining whether to convict a suspect, as demonstrated by the eyewitness in the State v. Hendersen (2011) case. Unfortunately, both standards are based upon subjective perception. For example, human error in memory processing may decrease the accuracy in an eyewitness testimony. Research should be done on individual interpretation as it relates to an eyewitness or the reasonable person in order to prevent any wrongful…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    DChism 10/10/2017 American government Research Paper #2 Outline Opening Statement /Thesis: There are many thoughts and questions that plague my mind when it comes to the death penalty and although this is a controversial topic, many laws concerning it don’t seem to be right to me. I mean, I would like to know why take a life for a life when you have been giving a life sentence. This makes no senses and even though an individual may commit murder no one deserves to die. The United Sates is made up of three branches of government.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays