Examples Of Milgram: Controversy In Ethics Of Obedience Research

Decent Essays
ethics of milgram
Controversy in Ethics of Obedience Research." Controversy in Ethics of Obedience Research. Web. 12 Nov. 2014. <http://cla.calpoly.edu/~cslem/101/Obey/Ethics.html>."

Although the test many seem harmful and stressful, after a year none of the subjects were found to be harmed by their experience. where 83% were glad to be part of the experiment, only 1% were not.”Milgram had believed that many of the subjects would disobey the experimenter at 150 volts (1).“ “When milgram saw that there was high levels of stress on some of the subjects, he investigated for any potential harm. Milgram states "As the experiment progressed there was no indication of injurious effects in the subjects; and as the subjects themselves strongly endorsed the experiment, the judgment I made was to continue the experiment(1).“ The
…show more content…
"Why Was the Milgram Experiment So Controversial?" About. Web. 12 Nov. 2014. <http://psychology.about.com/od/historyofpsychology/a/milgram.htm>.

The experiment raised serious ethical questions, but the experiment bought us answers to many questions. “Why did so many of the participants in this experiment perform a seemingly sadistic act on the instruction of an authority figure?(Cherry 1)” According to milgram a number of things lead to this. The fact that the scientist was in the room, yale sponsored the testing, they were led to believe the experiments to be safe, and the selection of people seemed random.

Martyn Shuttleworth (Jul 4, 2008). Milgram Experiment Ethics. Retrieved Nov 12, 2014 from Explorable.com: https://explorable.com/milgram-experiment-ethics

Todays experiments are not the same as they were back when milgram did his. because the ethics involved the experiment would not be allowed today. Because these peopl thought they had caused suffering, they could have emotional distress. “Milgram experiment appeared to have no long term effects on the participants(1),” The original experiment would not be allowed

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The people were yet pressured by the authority to continue and keep causing harm to the student which would make the experiment unethical. Overall, I feel like this was a successful experiment and the studies were efficient or…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An experiment should not cause any harm to its participants, even if it is not physical, but mental. In the defense of Milgram, however, the debrief of the participants afterwards usually ensured a decrease in their stress level due to the knowledge that the learner was safe from harm. Therefore, the effects of tension were only short-term, and the debriefing usually solved their problems. The participants were assured that their behavior was common and that they were not sadistic or horrible people. About 83.7% of people stated that they were happy to be involved in the experiment, and only 1.3% wished that they hadn't gone through the experiment.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The psychological testing that took place in the Milgram experiment was interesting to me. Even though I had learned about the experiment in previous courses, I had never seen actual footage from the testing. The most disturbing moment of the video was when one “teacher” was obviously in disagreement about administering the shocks, but continued…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, began an experiment in July 1961 that would drastically alter society’s perception of obedience. Milgram formulated a test to comprehend how far people would perform when coerced into obeying an authoritative figure. The experiment involved subjects being tricked into believing they were electrically shocking another individual; physical and emotional harm to the subjects was followed, resulting from the extreme tension they encountered. Ultimately, Milgram thought he found an underlying connection between his experiment and the Holocaust. The study manufactured mixed reactions from society.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The primary purpose of the Milgram's obedience/electroshock experiment was to test people's obedience to authority. I feel the test was able to fulfill its objectives. It was successful because it should that the majority of people tested were willing to fully accept, with some reservations, what a authority figure instructed them to do. In The Real World by Ferris and Stein (2008), we are told that to conducted the experiment a system was set were a research subject was assigned being a teacher and then two others who were administering the test would join, one as experimenter, the other as a learner. The teacher was then shown the learner being strapped to a chair and electrodes being attracted to there body.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stanley Milgram Outline

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages

    1. Explain and discuss the background events and ideas which led to Milgram’s research. Stanley Milgram (1963) was a American social psychologist who carried out the destructive obedience experiment at Yale University in 1963. He was very interested in how far people would go in a situation where it meant hurting another person under an authority figures orders. If an authority figure affected obedience levels in everyday American men. This idea came about after Adolf Eichmann's trial in Jerusalem in 1961.…

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ethical Considerations When conducting an experiment on human beings in psychology it is vital that all ethical considerations are thought of and addressed. These ethical considerations are called “The Code of Ethics” These are there to protect the rights and privacy of those who are participating in the experiment. Two major experiments that were conducted and their ethical approach are highly controversial are the: The Stanford Prison Experiment, and the, Milgram Experiment. These two experiments have come under criticism and controversy as their ethical approach may not have been very good or acceptable.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both writers have a different view over ethics as some might say Stanley Milgram believes that his experiment is fine and not inhumane; however he believes that he has conducted this experiment for science. Even though some test subjects such as “Gretchen Brandt, a Yale Medical Technician who works at Yale, asks throughout the experiment, ‘Shall I continue?’” (79 Milgram). Some might think that Stanley Milgram does not care about how the test subject feels until the end of the experiment. Which is true according to himself during the experiment if the test subject asks if he or she shall continue after the person getting shocked asks to stop, The experimenter says countless times “The experiment requires that you go on" (Milgram 79). Some might think that Stanley Milgram is an awful person for making these people go through such harsh choices on what is the right thing, Stanley Milgram states that “the subjects do not derive satisfaction from inflicting pain, but they often like the feeling they get from pleasing the experimenter" (86…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The subjects behavior would have been much different if it was known to them that their authority figure was just an actor. The third regulation violated was the Right to Withdraw. The authority figure in the experiment made it difficult for subjects to withdraw by urging them to continue with the shocks. The fourth guideline violated was Risk, also known as the protection from mental or physical harm. There were many ways in which The Milgram Experiment may have harmed the participants psychologically.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baurind Experiment Analysis

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Because the experiment takes place in a laboratory, Baumrind argues that participants will not act how they might in the real world. She states that the laboratory is an unaccustomed setting for a typical being and may cause anxiety and passivity (225). Correspondingly, Saul Mcleod, a psychologist who summarizes and critiques Milgram’s experiment, states that the “important” location of the experiment, obedience levels increased (Simply Psychology). The point about setting is one in which Baumrind and Parker are able to reach a consensus.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main conflict of Milgram 's experience which can be argued for both sides, that really settled the point where the experiment became unethical was the fact that patients could be considered to be psychologically harmed, even though the debriefing and explanations it could still have an effect on patient mind and…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical guidelines are crucial in research to minimise unnecessary physical or psychological harm to participants in an experiment. Before ethical guidelines existed in research, several experiments were not conducted ethically. In 1963, American psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted Milgram’s Study of Obedience investigating participants' obedience towards authority. The study demonstrated multiple ethical issues which proved the importance of ethics in research. This report will address the ethical principles that Milgram's study covered poorly and how they could be modified to improve the study.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiments, for example, were the only one true way of making true findings and it did explore controversial findings. The BPS ‘Code of Human Research Ethics’ also states it should not influence the individuals’ decision to participate. It is important to ensure that participants are deceived as little as possible and that no harm or distress is caused. The true nature of the research should also be revealed in debriefing such as Milgram’s experiment, where he also ensured that the teachers and learners had a reconciliation with each…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Baumrind argued that after each subject walked out of the experiment Milgram 's approach to reconcile the distraught they had been through was unconvincing (92). Martyn Shuttleworth, author of Milgram Experiment Ethics, often talked how emotionally stressful this experiment was for people. Shuttleworth correlates in her article that there indeed were long term side effects of this taunting experiment (Shuttleworth). While Baumrind implied there should have been a greater amount of a debriefing process, Ian Parker agreed with how the debriefing process occurred (Parker 99).…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Milgram designed his study to show the lengths to which people might be coerced with little or no threat to themselves into obeying instructions given by a “superior.” Milgram recruited people that thought they were in fact administering a study, but in truth were they object of intense study. These people were instructed by a “superior” researcher to administer painful electrical shocks to people based on the superior’s instruction. Few people refused to administer these shocks, even when it meant they were applying lethal amounts. (Fichtelberg…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays