The article defines constructive discourse as a means of collaboration and friction to develop and discount ideas to the ends of a high-performance team that can produce solutions. It explores the team environment and rules that set a team up for success during the team building phases. The forming, storming, norming, performing model is used to explain the difficulties that can arise in communication. It suggests that teams do not avoid conflict, but use this engagement to sharpen ideas in the group to guide innovative solutions. This discourse can lead to solidifying the team, building trust, increased creativity, group empowerment, and operational transparency. There are vital fundamentals that set the foundation for team dynamics and must be adhered to for an environment that will foster communication and invite input from all members. The team must be able to separate their personal feelings from the business of the team to find a solution. Ensure that all topics and issues are debatable and nothing is off limits. This will allow the team to take ownership of the policies and have a fuller understanding of the problem set. The team has guidelines to keep them engaged and focused on reaching a resolution which sometimes requires coaching. Each team member must feel equal to other …show more content…
The discourse of a team is vital to a team forming a solution which benefits the business and not the members of the team. This communication allows the members hone each other’s ideas, shape the answer, and formulate inventive means to accomplish the end. The advantage of the constructive discourse is it is a controlled environment for participants to channel ideas with members as sounding boards to prove or disprove the validity of a plan for the benefit of an