Cārvāka And Buddhism Analysis

Superior Essays
Of the lines of inquiry within Indian Philosophy, two popular yet often opposed viewpoints are Cārvāka and Buddhism. Thus, this paper will begin with an analysis of the two schools, outlining their differing methods of thought. Next, I will show that Cārvāka could respond to the beliefs of Buddhism by arguing that a self, in at least a limited sense, obviously exists, especially if one accepts perception as a reliable means to knowledge. Finally, Buddhism could rationally respond by arguing against the epistemology of Cārvāka, showing that it presupposes the grounds needed for Buddhist to argue for lack of self. In order to highlight points of dispute between two philosophical schools, one must first gain foundational understanding of those …show more content…
For example, if one accepts that perception is the only reliable means to knowledge, then only the things one perceives exist (Sarma, 4). This creates quite a materialistic worldview, grounded in that with which you can causally and directly interact with. Moreover, this leaves no room for the supernatural or the afterlife; no, the world must be explained through material interactions and relationships. Thus, Cārvāka says, “There is, then, no eternal ātman (self), or even an all-pervading god to whom religious rites should be performed” (Sarma, 5). With no fear or hope of another life, the follower of Cārvāka then devotes himself to maximizing materialistic pleasure and minimizing personal …show more content…
That said, there does not seem to be a rational way for one to consistently utilize inference as a reliable means to knowledge, and yet simultaneously deny that it is a reliable means to knowledge. In similar fashion to a follower of Cārvāka inferring that certain things will maximize pleasure or minimize pain, Buddhism concludes that no self exists. Therefore, Buddhism argues from strong inference that no self exists. Furthermore, the lack of a self does not undermine perception, as a changing object can still perceive and reach knowledge from those perceptions. Nothing within perception states that a uniform, consistent essence or self must

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    A comparative analysis of the two religions Christianity and Buddhism shows many similarities and differences. Both religions believe in their own form of creator, they both have sacred text and symbols either the Christian bible or the 4 books of Buddha. The Christian faith believe in the cross, Buddhist have the Dharma. They both celebrate the life of their creator with different forms of…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part I: Krishna’s Worldviews This paper will examine, in two parts, the worldviews of Krishna and Hinduism. The first part of the paper will examine four of the worldviews covered in class in relation to how they align with the beliefs of Krishna and Hinduism. The second part of the paper will examine a flaw in the logic of the worldviews and a way to remedy the flaw in the logic. Excerpts from the Bhagavad Gita as well as from the Upanishads will support analysis of the worldviews.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Buddhist and Hindu approach to spiritual fulfillment differ in many ways, but have some similarities. In The Bhagavad-Gita and “The Sermon at Benares”, we see how Buddhism and Hinduism define human problems, as well as the suggested solution to the problem. Even though the text and values of these religions were created centuries ago,…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes: The objective behind Descartes Cogito and Avicenna’s flying man are vastly different. To begin with, Descartes is trying to show his readers that there is at least one thing that cannot be doubted. For example, if one think about how the Meditations begin, Descartes says he is setting out to engage in radical doubt; that he is going to get rid of, or at least bracket, all of the beliefs that he has that are susceptible to doubt. Avicenna: Avicenna, by contrast, does not say anything about radical doubt; rather, the point is something about the soul and the way it relates to the body.…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justifying belief and what is knowledge’s nature and scope is well defined by the philosophical stance of “naturalized epistemology” in that knowledge comes from the empirical sciences though it’s application of theory, methods and results. Knowledge comes from proving things. This is different from the classical foundationalism which asserts the need to basic belief from which other beliefs can be built on. This essay will discuss the distinctiveness of naturalized epistemology, then how it differs from classical foundationalism and conclude with why it is referable. It should be noted that both systems of knowledge have many variations and so this short essay is more a general discussion.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the middle of the 17th century, thinkers in the enlightenment began to question how belief in the existence of a monotheistic God could be rationally supported. A number of arguments for and against the existence of God emerged at this time, and while the philosophical debate on the existence of God is still in session, the initial dust has settled. At this point in time, it is abundantly clear that a the cosmological argument is untenable at both a metaphysical and empirical level, and that the various versions of the cosmological argument fail to support the existence of God. There is good reason for critically examining the cosmological argument. Theists have made a claim that God exists.…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Therefore, Berkeley refutes Descartes’ and Locke’s dualism. Berkeley aims to defeat the issues of skepticism and Atheism, for he believes that neither Locke nor Descartes properly captured the essence of God. Consequently,…

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is there such a thing like free will? Are human actions based on real human choices or there is something else hidden behind the whole world idea? How are these all related to determinism? Well, in the field of philosophy these questions are well known and wait for a possible correct answer without any results. Philosophers have been arguing all around the “free will” topic for a long time and discovered that there is not such a correct answer to explain and attest the validity of this conception.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thematic Essay Draft Religion has come very far throughout history some have failed and some are still practiced today. Religion can even influence millions of lives around the world. Two of these types of religions include Buddhism and Christianity. They are still alive and thriving all over the world today. Buddhism is one of the many religions and belief systems in the world today.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1 In Parmenides’ poem, there is a clear relationship between truth and justice. The “man who knows” and is just can see the paths of “is” and “is not.” The “is” path, known as the “path of Persuasion, accompanies Objective Truth.” According to the poem, one can not even see the objective truth without first seeking enlightenment and being just. This just man will try to understand the truth of justice.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Luberda PHIL 1100 04 December 12th Throughout the course of this paper, the topic of skepticism will be discussed in multiple ways. First skepticism will be introduced in John Pollock’s short article A Brain in a Vat. Then the difference between ordinary incredulity and general philosophical skepticism will be discussed. Finally, the various general philosophical skepticism will be analyzed and opinions of arguments will be discussed.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The subject of whether or not God exists has elicited numerous philosophical debates over the years. Many philosophers have questioned whether God exists, with some arguing that he does exist while others refute this claim. The debates on the existence of God is based on the teleological and cosmological arguments. In his article, McCloskey refutes the claims made by these two arguments and holds that they are false. The author states that humans should dismiss the idea of God since there is evil in the world.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hinduism and Jainism are both ancient religions originating from South Asia, or more specifically India. They both have many similar characteristic features, such as the concepts of samsara, karma and moksha. But, they also differs in many things, even including the concepts of three aforementioned terms. This essay will compare the following five concepts: karma, samasara, ahimsa, moksha, and world renunciation, and explain their purposes in both Hinduism and Jainism. Notably these five concepts are surprisingly complex and carries great deals of importance to both religions.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title: Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind Author: Dr. V. S. Ramachandran, Sandra Blakeslee About the author: Dr. V. S. Ramachandran is a professor of neurology and psychology at the University of California, San Diego, and Sandra Blakeslee reports on Science for The New York Times. All about Phantoms The book describes Dr. Ramachandran's experiences with patients who had clinical problems and provides an insight into how the human brain works. Dr. Ramachandran describes fascinating clinical syndromes in his own peculiar style. In this book, he makes an attempt to understand why brain damage can make someone think his parents are impostors, or a woman with a stroke laugh uncontrollably; how a man with a stroke can be unaware that his left side is paralyzed, or why certain types of epileptic patients have intense religious experiences.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays